This kind of thing fascinates me.
1 posted on
04/29/2024 9:25:53 AM PDT by
kawhill
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-38 next last
To: kawhill
Why not? We’ve decided biology doesn’t exist any longer either and by God, doctors can engineer a penis on a woman and “milk” from men’s breasts.
2 posted on
04/29/2024 9:27:59 AM PDT by
PGR88
To: kawhill
3 posted on
04/29/2024 9:29:01 AM PDT by
waterhill
(I Believe!)
To: kawhill
Heck, Aang already laughs at gravity all the time.
4 posted on
04/29/2024 9:30:15 AM PDT by
AndyTheBear
(Certified smarter than average for my species)
To: kawhill
5 posted on
04/29/2024 9:31:23 AM PDT by
Red Badger
(Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegals are put up in 5 Star hotels....................)
To: kawhill
British Electrical Engineer Roger Shawyer first introduced the “Impossible Drive.” And it's every bit as good as the Impossible Burger.
7 posted on
04/29/2024 9:33:13 AM PDT by
ProtectOurFreedom
(“When exposing a crime is treated like a crime, you are being ruled by criminals” – Edward Snowden)
To: kawhill
8 posted on
04/29/2024 9:33:56 AM PDT by
Magnum44
(...against all enemies, foreign and domestic... )
To: kawhill
To: kawhill
11 posted on
04/29/2024 9:35:22 AM PDT by
Cats1
To: kawhill
I’ve read about this. it is very interesting, but comments from other scientist say it lacks proof and pier review.
12 posted on
04/29/2024 9:35:41 AM PDT by
BigFreakinToad
(Remember the Biden Kitchen Fire of 2004)
To: kawhill
13 posted on
04/29/2024 9:35:55 AM PDT by
bigbob
To: kawhill
We live in a “Make $hit Up World” anyway. Might as well go all out.
16 posted on
04/29/2024 9:39:09 AM PDT by
blackdog
((Z28.310) Be careful what you say. Your refrigerator may be listening & reporting you.)
To: kawhill
Same old, same old.
Assuming it's not outright fabrication (i.e. lying) for fame or funding, I guarantee that the following is true in some form:
The experiments/tests that indicated massless propulsion were inaccurate. Period.
Maybe it was measurement error, procedural error, neglecting to take into account the entirety of the operational system (you might "win" in one part but you "lose" in another), rounding error, etc.
At best, an honest mistake.
At worst, a scam.
Nobody "defies the laws of physics", at least not on Earth, and as far as we can tell, anywhere else.
So sorry, play again....
17 posted on
04/29/2024 9:41:02 AM PDT by
dayglored
(Strange Women Lying In Ponds Distributing Swords! Arthur Pendragon in 2024)
To: kawhill
Producing thrust without releasing propellant doesn’t defy the laws of physic. It does defy the way we do things, but that’s because we got addicted to rockets. But let’s not forget that they are 13th century technology, there are options.
19 posted on
04/29/2024 9:41:29 AM PDT by
discostu
(like a dog being shown a card trick)
To: kawhill
I can tell you about gravity. It hurts.
20 posted on
04/29/2024 9:41:49 AM PDT by
waterhill
(I Believe!)
To: kawhill
I think this technology was launched into space a few months ago but the satellite itself suffered a failure which did not allow the drive to be tested. Also, IIRC the forces (supposedly) produced are small so things like component outgassing and solar radiation make force verification difficult.
I too find this all fascinating. For a lot of quantum science the actual mechanisms are not well understood and boil down to “our mathematical models say this should work.”
To: kawhill
25 posted on
04/29/2024 9:45:05 AM PDT by
dayglored
(Strange Women Lying In Ponds Distributing Swords! Arthur Pendragon in 2024)
To: kawhill
“produce thrust without releasing . . . would be a game-changer”
Ultimate Birth Control!
29 posted on
04/29/2024 9:50:00 AM PDT by
Macoozie
(Roll MAGA, roll!)
To: kawhill
31 posted on
04/29/2024 9:52:38 AM PDT by
frank ballenger
(There's a battle outside and it's raging. It'll soon shake your windows and rattle your walls.)
To: kawhill
To: kawhill
Here he is explaining his theory to a colleague:
34 posted on
04/29/2024 9:56:31 AM PDT by
Yo-Yo
(Is the /Sarc tag really necessary? Pray for President Biden: Psalm 109:8)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-38 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson