Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Crusade of Controversy (Boycott anti-Christian 'Kingdom of Heaven?)
Washington Times ^ | May 6, 2005 | Scott Galup

Posted on 05/06/2005 8:41:56 PM PDT by GulliverSwift

All Ridley Scott wanted to do was make a movie about a medieval knight....

Months before that, Jonathan Riley-Smith, an ecclesiastical professor and Crusades expert at Cambridge University, had the opposite take. "It's Osama bin Laden's version of history," he told London's Daily Telegraph newspaper in January 2004. "It will fuel the Islamic fundamentalists..."

While his goal was balance, Mr. Scott admits the movie has a point of view: Religious fanaticism leads to pointless slaughter....

Also, that Christians started it.

"I think we did," Mr. Scott says, referring broadly to Western Christendom and echoing conventional 20th-century wisdom that the Crusades (a succession of battles and skirmishes running from 1095 to 1291) began as an act of Christian aggression — namely Pope Urban II's order to take back Jerusalem from Muslim Turks.

But that question — who started it? — isn't so simple.

After all, Thomas F. Madden points out, Muslim armies, by the time of the Crusades, had taken over two-thirds of the Christian world, including lands such as Syria and Turkey, the heart of the early church. Mr. Madden, a St. Louis University historian and author of "A Concise History of the Crusades," says Christians were fighting a defensive war, just as church creedalists said at the time.

Mr. Scott responds with realpolitik: "That's like saying the Indians have a right to take back the United States, and Australia belongs to the Aborigines. You may be right. ...Go ahead and try."...

Christians clearly bear the brunt of Mr. Scott and Mr. Monahan's anti-clericalism. Christian priests are depicted as doltish dogmatists, while the Kurdish warrior Saladin (played by Ghassan Massoud) is written as a sort of pluralist ahead of his time.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: crusades; kingdomofheaven; moviereview; thecrusades; thomasfmadden; thomasmadden
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last
Why don't they do a movie about the Muslim armies who forced Islam on all the previously Christian countries in the Middle East, or a movie about the Muslim takeover of Spain, or the battle to take over Vienna?

I liked Ridley Scott's Gladiator movie, but that was not a Christian-bashing liberal movie.

I hope the movie studio, which spent millions of dollars on this movie, will experience a massive failure such as that endured by the makers of the homo movie 'Alexandar.'

I for one will not see it.

(BTW, I'm looking forward to Gladiator 2, unless it cheers on lions eating Christians in the Coliseum.)

1 posted on 05/06/2005 8:41:56 PM PDT by GulliverSwift
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: GulliverSwift

I wouldn't mind an honest and objective movie about the Crusades, i.e., not covering up the bad stuff like the sack of Constantinople or the massacre in Jerusalem, but which also tries to understand the beliefs and thinking of the time, not just try to score points based on some contemporary political agenda. I guess this is not the movie I was hoping for.


2 posted on 05/06/2005 8:50:09 PM PDT by Unam Sanctam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GulliverSwift

Unfortunately, many people who go to see the movie will probably accept every little detail as fact.

(I have to admit, I myself knew and still know very little about the Crusades. Until recently, I had been taught that it was a war started by Christians to force Christianity on other parts of the world).


3 posted on 05/06/2005 8:51:22 PM PDT by Tired of Taxes (News junkie here)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Unam Sanctam

The first "crusade" was launched by Muslims.


4 posted on 05/06/2005 8:51:39 PM PDT by GulliverSwift (Just say no to McCain and Giulliani)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tired of Taxes
You should read about the siege of Vienna and the Battle of Vienna.
5 posted on 05/06/2005 8:54:34 PM PDT by GulliverSwift (Just say no to McCain and Giulliani)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: GulliverSwift

From what I understand the extremists come off badly on both sides.


6 posted on 05/06/2005 8:56:46 PM PDT by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Borges
Christians clearly bear the brunt of Mr. Scott and Mr. Monahan's anti-clericalism. Christian priests are depicted as doltish dogmatists, while the Kurdish warrior Saladin (played by Ghassan Massoud) is written as a sort of pluralist ahead of his time.
7 posted on 05/06/2005 8:58:17 PM PDT by GulliverSwift (Just say no to McCain and Giulliani)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: GulliverSwift

Saladin wasn't an extremist and isn't remembered by History as such. The Crusaders, many of whom burned Jews alive in Synagogues, were.


8 posted on 05/06/2005 9:00:09 PM PDT by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: GulliverSwift

Thanks for the links.


9 posted on 05/06/2005 9:02:19 PM PDT by Tired of Taxes (News junkie here)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Borges

"Saladin wasn't an extremist and isn't remembered by History as such. The Crusaders, many of whom burned Jews alive in Synagogues, were."

cite?


10 posted on 05/06/2005 9:02:52 PM PDT by bnelson44 (Armed Forces Day May 21, 2005)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: GulliverSwift
Saladin, a Kurd, is played by an Arab actor. Of course, in the general confusion of this film the fact that Kurds are not Arabs hardly merits mention. Sorry I brought it up.
11 posted on 05/06/2005 9:05:06 PM PDT by Malesherbes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bnelson44

Cite what? Saladin is one of the most respected figures of the medieval world. As for the Jews being burned alive it's well documented in various places. Despite the efforts of people like Bernard of Clarivaux to protect them. It's one of the key events (Jews refusing to convert and being burned alive) in modern Jewish history.


12 posted on 05/06/2005 9:05:37 PM PDT by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: GulliverSwift

Does ANYONE believe hollyweird types can do anything to show christianity as eeeeeeeevil and Islam as good?

They kowtow to islam pc advocates and poop upon any christianity positives.


13 posted on 05/06/2005 9:07:29 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Borges
People remember what they want to remember. Muslims invaded and occupied Christian Spain for 700 years. After taking over Spain, they tried to take over the rest of Christian Europe but were stopped by Charles Martell "The Hammer" in France.

Finally after 700 years the Muslims were expelled to North Africa by Ferdinand and Isabella, the same ones who sponsored Columbus's explorations.

14 posted on 05/06/2005 9:07:31 PM PDT by GulliverSwift (Just say no to McCain and Giulliani)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Borges

"Cite what? Saladin is one of the most respected figures of the medieval world. As for the Jews being burned alive it's well documented in various places. Despite the efforts of people like Bernard of Clarivaux to protect them. It's one of the key events (Jews refusing to convert and being burned alive) in modern Jewish history."

Yes, cite a respected history of the period that states that the Crusaders burned Jews alive in the Lavent. I am not saying your wrong. I have not read that, and would like a cite, if, as you say, it is true.


15 posted on 05/06/2005 9:08:26 PM PDT by bnelson44 (Armed Forces Day May 21, 2005)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: GulliverSwift

Oh I'm not defending the Medieval Islamic Jihad. I just don't have much affection for the Crusaders. And according to that article the main 'Christian bashing' going on is showing Saladin as enlightened for his time (he was) and the many Crusaders as being zealots (they were).


16 posted on 05/06/2005 9:09:34 PM PDT by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Borges

Apparently the movie lacked perspective and the proper context.


17 posted on 05/06/2005 9:12:42 PM PDT by GulliverSwift (Just say no to McCain and Giulliani)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: GulliverSwift

Did it say that CAIR liked this movie?

Well that says it all.

It is Pro-Muslim tripe...


18 posted on 05/06/2005 9:15:42 PM PDT by ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Borges

Saladin had taken counsel and laid down these ransom terms for the inhabitants of Jerusalem: each male, ten years old and over, was to pay ten besants for his ransom; females, five besants; boys, seven years old and under, one. Those who wished would be freed on these terms and could leave securely with their possessions. The inhabitants of Jerusalem who would not accept these terms, or those who did not have ten besants, were to become booty, to be slain by the army's swords. This agreement pleased the lord Patriarch and the others who had money ....

Source:

De Expugatione Terrae Sanctae per Saladinum, [The Capture of the Holy Land by Saladin], ed. Joseph Stevenson, Rolls Series, (London: Longmans, 1875), translated by James Brundage, The Crusades: A Documentary History, (Milwaukee, WI: Marquette University Press, 1962), 159-63
Copyright note: Professor Brundage informed the Medieval Sourcebook that copyright was not renewed on this work. Moreover he gave permission for use of his translations.
http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/source/1187saladin.html


19 posted on 05/06/2005 9:16:27 PM PDT by bnelson44 (Armed Forces Day May 21, 2005)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: bnelson44; Alouette; Bella_Bru
The act of martyrdom for your faith rather then converting is called 'kiddush ha-Shem'. It's a phrase closely associated with the events taking place during the Crusades. Godfrey of Bouillon dealt with the Jews in Jerusalem when they got there'. William Nicholls' book 'Christian Antisemitism' talks about it. Maybe some FReinds can help out with other sources.
20 posted on 05/06/2005 9:17:31 PM PDT by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson