Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

UPDATE: Reuters Dismisses Photog Over Doctored Pictures
Editor and Publisher ^ | 8/7/06 | Editor and Publisher Staff

Posted on 08/07/2006 8:55:04 AM PDT by GeorgiaDawg32

t all started with just one contested image, brought to light by bloggers: In the original picture, thin smoke can be seen rising over Beirut after a recent Israeli air strike; in the published photograph, thick, black smoke billows. "The photographer has denied deliberately attempting to manipulate the image, saying that he was trying to remove dust marks and that he made mistakes due to the bad lighting conditions he was working under," said Moira Whittle, the head of public relations for Reuters, on Sunday.

(Excerpt) Read more at editorandpublisher.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: adnanhajj; fauxtography; lookinbreakingnews; reuters
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last
I did a title search and didn't see this posted. If it's a duplicate, I apologize..
1 posted on 08/07/2006 8:55:04 AM PDT by GeorgiaDawg32
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: GeorgiaDawg32
This scandal is proof that the MSM is totally clueless about just how fast people can fact-check in the modern Internet age. They still haven't learned from the Rathergate fiasco.
2 posted on 08/07/2006 8:57:15 AM PDT by RayChuang88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeorgiaDawg32
he was trying to remove dust marks

LOL! What a lame excuse! I've got a bridge to sell.....

3 posted on 08/07/2006 8:58:50 AM PDT by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeorgiaDawg32
saying that he was trying to remove dust marks and that he made mistakes due to the bad lighting conditions he was working under

That isn't going to fly! He needs to take his cue from certain senior American journalists and claim that the smoke was darker before but he couldn't get his camera out so he had to modify the later photo and thus the photograph was "fake but accurate".

4 posted on 08/07/2006 9:00:48 AM PDT by Gator101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: expatpat

Just as long as it isn't the Brooklyn Bridge.

I just bought it last week!

:)


5 posted on 08/07/2006 9:01:19 AM PDT by Bigh4u2 (Denial is the first requirement to be a liberal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: expatpat

Trying to remove dust marks by adding black billowing clouds? Can't even lie well.


6 posted on 08/07/2006 9:02:07 AM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: GeorgiaDawg32
I should try that "bad lighting" excuse the next time i drop trow in front of a date. Roiders News Agency just proved they are incapable of editorial control and is permissive of terrorsist propaganda. Add them to the list of terrorist sympathizers and to the Enemies of Freedom list.

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

7 posted on 08/07/2006 9:02:35 AM PDT by MAD-AS-HELL (Put a mirror to the face of the republican party and all you'll see is a Donkey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: expatpat
Yes like this one - I found another - LOL

I bet there are hundreds

An American Expat in Southeast Asia

8 posted on 08/07/2006 9:03:49 AM PDT by expatguy (http://laotze.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: GeorgiaDawg32

Where are their Editors?! If some pajamahadeen can figure out the photo has been doctored, the editor should be able to.


9 posted on 08/07/2006 9:05:34 AM PDT by CholeraJoe (USAF Air Rescue "That others may live.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CholeraJoe
If some pajamahadeen can figure out the photo has been doctored, the editor should be able to...

That would imply the editor wanted to....

10 posted on 08/07/2006 9:08:42 AM PDT by vrwinger (You're entitled to your own opinion, but not your own facts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: MAD-AS-HELL

"Roiders News Agency"

As in "Hemo'Rrhoiders News Agency"? LOL!! Good one!


11 posted on 08/07/2006 9:12:02 AM PDT by Polyxene (For where God built a church, there the Devil would also build a chapel - Martin Luther)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: GeorgiaDawg32
""The photographer has denied deliberately attempting to manipulate the image, saying that he was trying to remove dust marks and that he made mistakes due to the bad lighting conditions he was working under,"

Hah Hah!
Surely even Al Reuters doesn't belive their own BS.
As for the moonbat "Editor and Publisher" the less said about those suckers the better.
They are simply beyond the pale.
12 posted on 08/07/2006 9:14:23 AM PDT by Jameison
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Polyxene

Actually, that's not what I meant but that works as well. I was attempting to convey the idea that they are like a person on steroids aka 'roids (being artificially inflated; fake). Thank you!


13 posted on 08/07/2006 9:15:29 AM PDT by MAD-AS-HELL (Put a mirror to the face of the republican party and all you'll see is a Donkey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: GeorgiaDawg32; All
Reuters calls the doctor, take 2 ( More fake Photos )

Qana - the director's cut (Hezbollah Propaganda)***MUST READ***!

14 posted on 08/07/2006 9:17:55 AM PDT by fanfan (WAW - Women Against Weenification!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bigh4u2

Wouldn't you like to buy mine, and have a matching pair?


15 posted on 08/07/2006 9:17:56 AM PDT by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: GeorgiaDawg32

Hajj's entire portfolio of 900-plus photos at Reuters has been pulled.

I guess they're scared s**tless that the New Media will find a whole slew of other "Reutered" photos.


16 posted on 08/07/2006 9:22:27 AM PDT by George Smiley (This tagline has been Reutered. (Can you tell?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: expatpat

Only if you deliver it and pay the shipping charges!



:0)


17 posted on 08/07/2006 9:24:46 AM PDT by Bigh4u2 (Denial is the first requirement to be a liberal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: pissant
Re: Reuters: Is this not a THIRD?


The ?third-doctored picture was by the same notorious "photographer"
and has the same distinctive smoke pattern. Does it not, FReepers?


18 posted on 08/07/2006 9:31:14 AM PDT by Diogenesis (Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis

My two cents would be that those are pasted pics. There is no way that the air would be so crystal clear around Mahmoud walking in the pic if the building was destoryed thusly and still in a dark smoke burn. Hell, a housefire in my neighborhood filled the air with haze.


19 posted on 08/07/2006 9:35:10 AM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: GeorgiaDawg32

looks like another home run for the Pajama Patrol.


20 posted on 08/07/2006 9:37:20 AM PDT by camle (keep your mind open and somebody will fill it full of something for you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson