Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

The U.S., Australia, India and China are aware of the hoax. When will the shake-down end?
1 posted on 12/14/2007 7:57:57 PM PST by Libloather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
To: Libloather

When we something something to the UN that I can’t talk about online.


2 posted on 12/14/2007 7:59:57 PM PST by wastedyears (Duncan Hunter is like a cheeseburger and fries. Simple presentation with no frills.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather
When will the shake-down end?

When it is no longer profitable to those who perpetuate it.
4 posted on 12/14/2007 8:01:27 PM PST by kinoxi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather
What? They want US to pay THEM to clean up THEIR crap?

After insulting the USA and that brave man, Steven Harper in Canada for calling them on their money grab and saying Canada won't sign any deal in which all nations must take part equally to reduce emissions of "green house gases?

I say screw you China, India, you are the worlds worst polluters, we do enough by buying your crap. When you expand your economy, do it in a CLEAN way, or else we will put tariffs on your dirty- made by polluting- garbage products.

6 posted on 12/14/2007 8:07:52 PM PST by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

“....changes to a final text to strengthen the role of rich nations in providing clean technology and finance to help them fight global warming.”

“finance” being the word I took most notice of. Typical. It always comes down to being given a handout with turd world countries. We are running a huge deficit, China has billions in dollars and STILL they think we should pay. Screw them.


7 posted on 12/14/2007 8:09:44 PM PST by Bogtrotter52 (Reading DU daily so you won't hafta)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather
India and China objected on Saturday ... saying rich nations should do more to lead the way.

Read that as "This doesn't hurt the economies of the west nearly enough to suit our agenda..."

8 posted on 12/14/2007 8:10:47 PM PST by CodeMasterPhilzar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

It’s no secret that India and China are opposed to any climate treaty that requires them to participate.


10 posted on 12/14/2007 8:14:20 PM PST by Blackyce (President Jacques Chirac: "As far as I'm concerned, war always means failure.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

“The U.S., Australia, India and China are aware of the hoax.”

Australia has now been taken over by Gore-bots. Insanity is on the march.


11 posted on 12/14/2007 8:15:41 PM PST by devere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather
India and China are aware of the hoax.

They were aware from the beginning, but under Kyoto they had a free ride under "developing nation" status so they went along. I think this means the free ride might be threatened, and as I predicted they did a 180 on the subject.

12 posted on 12/14/2007 8:17:20 PM PST by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather; xcamel

“The only people who would be hurt by abandoning the Kyoto Protocol would be several thousand people who make a living attending conferences on global warming.”

- Professor Kirill Kondratyev, Russian Academy of Sciences


15 posted on 12/14/2007 8:20:12 PM PST by george76 (Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather
After overnight talks lasting beyond a planned Friday deadline, India told a 190-nation meeting that it wanted changes to a final text to strengthen the role of rich nations in providing clean technology and finance to help them fight global warming.

In other words, give me free stuff and pay me. It's the kind of stuff I've come to expect from the homeland of Indra "middle finger" Nooyi.

18 posted on 12/14/2007 8:22:46 PM PST by Zhang Fei
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather
Sorry, the Aussies signed the Kyoto Treaty in the last couple of weeks as one of the first items on the agenda of the new government there.
20 posted on 12/14/2007 8:24:01 PM PST by Liaison
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather; Zhang Fei

It would be economic suicide for India to sign the Kyoto treaty which wants to equate the emissions of a country the size of India, with another state the size of Singapore. You can’t expect India to have the same CO2 emissions as Singapore. India is ready for a per-capita cap. In other words, screw Global Warming. If the coasts swell, let’s move inland.

When it’s a per-capita emission limit based treaty, there will be some movement on this. Otherwise it should be a definite and clear ‘no’ from India.


26 posted on 12/14/2007 8:36:16 PM PST by CarrotAndStick (The articles posted by me needn't necessarily reflect my opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

What a complete and abysmal waste of time the UN is, and particularly on this faux man-made global warming, or climate change, or “coldest winter in 20 years,” or hotter magma, or whatever the heck they’re calling it today.


29 posted on 12/14/2007 8:40:36 PM PST by hsalaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather
[If approved, a draft decision would launch two years of talks on a sweeping new long-term treaty to involve all nations and succeed the U.N.’s Kyoto Protocol.]

It won’t “involve all nations” any more than Kyoto does. The Chinese and Indians couldn’t adhere to this thing if they wanted to. And the U.S. Senate doesn't have to either.

30 posted on 12/14/2007 8:49:53 PM PST by Brad from Tennessee ("A politician can't give you anything he hasn't first stolen from you.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

IT is a shakedown. I heard that a international green program that pays for the destruction of “bad carbon” and other toxic chemicals exists and that countries like china and India who can make billions form not doing a dang thing to stop making the toxins so they can continue to destroy these wastes for the money. its a international scam at its finest.


31 posted on 12/14/2007 8:52:52 PM PST by Liaison
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather
U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions Declined 1.5 Percent in 2006

Total U.S. greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions were 7,075.6 million metric tons carbon dioxide equivalent (MMTCO2e) in 2006, a decrease of 1.5 percent from the 2005 level according to Emissions of Greenhouse Gases in the United States 2006, a report released today by the Energy Information Administration (EIA). Since 1990, U.S. GHG emissions have grown at an average annual rate of 0.9 percent. The 2006 emissions decrease is only the third decline in annual emissions since 1990.

http://www.eia.doe.gov/neic/press/press291.html

33 posted on 12/14/2007 8:57:53 PM PST by Brad from Tennessee ("A politician can't give you anything he hasn't first stolen from you.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather
NEWSWEEK: AL GORE NOW WORTH MORE THAN $100 MILLION

[Since 2000, according to published reports, the former veep has transformed himself from a public servant with around $1 million in the bank to a sparkling private consultant with a net worth estimated to be north of $100 million. He’s a senior adviser to Google, a board member at Apple and now a newly minted general partner at Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers, the Silicon Valley venture-capital firm that made billions investing early in Netscape, Amazon and Google.]

http://www.newsweek.com/id/71011

34 posted on 12/14/2007 9:00:41 PM PST by Brad from Tennessee ("A politician can't give you anything he hasn't first stolen from you.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather
Why is this surprising? This is about money redistribution. What are the odds that our dems and even our own businessmen will find a way to give China a pass?

The West is gonna pay it all if this thing ever does fly.

38 posted on 12/14/2007 9:28:35 PM PST by Earthdweller (All reality is based on faith in something.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather
From the article*:
I'm just a tin horn dictator of a third world hell hole. And I say to Hell with Global Warming/Climate Change, what ever you want to call it. All I care about is how much MONEY the big guys are gonna give me. Period.
*Well, not really, but I'm sure you get my drift :)
41 posted on 12/14/2007 10:34:58 PM PST by upchuck (Hildabeaste as Prez... unimaginable, devastating misery! She will redefine "How bad can it get?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather
India and China will never sign onto binding targets. That's why all this talk of rolling back CO2 emissions is so much hot air and every one knows it.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

43 posted on 12/15/2007 12:17:32 PM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson