Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

WARS ON THE WAY
Written by Dr. Jack Wheeler
Friday, 08 February 2008

While attention is fixated on Iraq and Afghanistan, the possibility of a number of other wars clearly emerged in the past few days, three in particular.

Starting January 30, a total of five undersea telecom cables have been mysteriously cut in the Persian Gulf and the Middle East area. This is no accident, comrades. Someone has been slicing them. Someone with submarines to do the slicing. Who could that be? And what would be their target?

90% of all internet traffic is handled by undersea cables. So take a look at the Internet Traffic Report for Asia (current as of this writing 2/7). Take a look at the only orange box with a fat zero of traffic and a packet loss of 100%.

Iran has been taken down.

Now gander at this story in Monday's (2/4) Jerusalem Post: US Anti-Missile Ship Docks in Haifa. It notes that the Aegis system on the USS San Jacinto can protect Israel from a missile attack from Iran.

Only our navy and Israel's has subs that could have cut the cables. Is this a prelude to an attack by either us or Israel on Iran, or is it a big time intimidation shot across Iran's bow? It's not clear - but it is clear that's it's one or the other, and either way, there are a lot of very nervous mullahs in Tehran right now.


1 posted on 02/09/2008 8:52:58 PM PST by shield
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: txflake; Perdogg; Dog

ping


2 posted on 02/09/2008 8:54:24 PM PST by shield (A wise man's heart is at his RIGHT hand;but a fool's heart at his LEFT. Ecc 10:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shield

Wasn’t this a Clive Cussler book? Or was it Tom Clancy??

Where’s Dirk Pitt and Jack Ryan when you need them?!?


3 posted on 02/09/2008 8:58:09 PM PST by pillut48 (CJ in TX --Soccer Mom and proud Rush Conservative with no dog in the presidential race now *sigh*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shield

Good analysis.

A shot across their bow? Perhaps. But the Persians were never a maritime power and wouldn’t recognize it as such.


4 posted on 02/09/2008 8:58:36 PM PST by SatinDoll (Desperately seeking a conservative candidate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shield

BTTT.

This is the biggest news story of the week, sliding past everyone’s radar.


5 posted on 02/09/2008 8:58:50 PM PST by Uncle Miltie (I'd rather oppose a Liberal Democrat than a Liberal Republican!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shield
Only our navy and Israel's has subs that could have cut the cables. Is this a prelude to an attack by either us or Israel on Iran, or is it a big time intimidation shot across Iran's bow

What an idiot. There are dozens of nations with the ability to cut cables underwater intentionally, and there's 45-50 or more a year cut by accident just in the Atlantic every year.

What's really funny, is if there was going to be war, the last thing the US or Israel wants is any communications involving Iran to be cut - they want to be listening in on those communications or tapping them as they were.
6 posted on 02/09/2008 8:59:12 PM PST by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shield

It’s not about us attacking Iran; it’s about us tracking down the physical location of the sender of attack signals to distributed terror cells.

When the 2nd internet cable was cut, you can find my post here on FR where I stated that more cuts would follow as net traffic was narrowed down further and further to limit the potential areas where a command originated.

Now 5 cables have been cut.

Had this been a prelude to an actual attack on Iran, the cables would have been cut less than an hour before missiles were in the air.


7 posted on 02/09/2008 9:00:23 PM PST by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jan in Colorado

ping


9 posted on 02/09/2008 9:02:38 PM PST by Gondring (I'll give up my right to die when hell freezes over my dead body!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shield

BTTT


10 posted on 02/09/2008 9:02:48 PM PST by Jet Jaguar (Who would the terrorists vote for?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shield

Ping


11 posted on 02/09/2008 9:03:34 PM PST by OPS4 (Ops4 God Bless America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shield

Or it could’ve been a wayward anchor-

http://www.cnn.com/2008/TECH/02/08/internet.outage/index.html?eref=rss_tech

That’s a lot less fun, though.


13 posted on 02/09/2008 9:04:20 PM PST by REDWOOD99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shield

In recent days a lot of major corporations have been wondering about the “wisdom” of exporting their call centers to a suddenly incommunicado India. Popcorn, front and center.


16 posted on 02/09/2008 9:07:33 PM PST by AbeKrieger (There is a special place in Hell for Lyndon Johnson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shield
One doesn't need a submarine to break, or "cut" a telecom cable. Bad anchoring can do it...bad fishing practices can do it (dragging trawl doors over unburied cable)

It can be grappled for, deliberately, from the surface. Cable repair ships retrieve the cables in that manner.
With enough ship & horsepower available, I bet I could find and break one, there in the shallow Persian Gulf waters. It would be pretty easy, actually.

I once saw an old [and then defunct] phone cable at the stern of the boat, draped over a trawl door --- and that was dragging it up out of 400+ fathoms of water! Someone had been there before we had, though, had snagged it, broke it, and left a bunch laying where it would be caught. I saw a kink in the cable...right near the door. Can't quite remember precisely how we got free of it, but we did, somehow.

17 posted on 02/09/2008 9:10:39 PM PST by BlueDragon (what a sad song it has become, no?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shield
Two du experts

DU experts? I think I see the problem...

18 posted on 02/09/2008 9:11:14 PM PST by null and void (President Hillary!™ Clinton? Time to invest in body bags. Again...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shield

>>
Only our navy and Israel’s has subs that could have cut the cables. Is this a prelude to an attack by either us or Israel on Iran, or is it a big time intimidation shot across Iran’s bow? It’s not clear - but it is clear that’s it’s one or the other, and either way, there are a lot of very nervous mullahs in Tehran right now.
<<

The first fault will be repaired within days. This theory only has a short time left if it is valid based on where these faults are.

Israel has the subs, diesel-electrics sold to them by Germany if I remember correctly. If these faults are a signal from someone, they are an ambiguous signal because a lot of cable users other than Iran were affected as well. I will believe it is a “signal” directed at Iran when the damage is more focused on them alone.


23 posted on 02/09/2008 9:21:43 PM PST by theBuckwheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shield
Iran has been taken down.

Iran's paranoid strategic - they would spot changes leading to an attack. If you're right, taking down the cables would give limited time - enough for a surprise attack - that is if they don't have satellite phones... who knows?

27 posted on 02/09/2008 9:45:16 PM PST by GOPJ (Take your ball - go home - sit this one out? Fifty years of liberal Supreme Court decisions? NO WAY.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shield

Well, actually any country with armed submarines can “cut” undersea cables. At this point the damage hasn’t been pinpointed publicly.

A torpedo will “cut” a cable quite nicely, thank you.

Actually, Iran has the most to gain from the loss of Internet access.

Mark


34 posted on 02/10/2008 4:13:51 AM PST by MarkL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shield
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iranian_Oil_Bourse
February 2008 On February 4, the Iranian Cabinet approved the creation of the oil bourse in two stages - first a raw oil exchange and secondly an oil byproducts exchange. The Ministry of Finance and Economics, the Oil Ministry, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and the Central Bank of Iran are required to create a workgroup to coordinate the project, and the Iran Commodities Bourse Company is given the task of carrying out the project. The communique from the Cabinet states that the "Ministry of Finance and Economics is required to take measures in making the petrochemical byproducts bourse operational by the end of February 2008." [20]

44 posted on 02/10/2008 12:39:09 PM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson