[sickoflibs]

RE :”Through the 1980s to 2000s, evolutionists were EAGER to debate those scientists and thinkers who think intelligent design is a viable model for biological origins and diversity.”

What model ?? ID says ‘its here, just appeared one day long ago. we can never go beyond that. Now try to prove that wrong’

That's hardly a model.

Back in the 1700s and 1800s Creationism was the paradigm.
But then the Ark got overloaded by new finds and sunk it.

When IDers propose a model for how ID got it all here then there is something to debate,.

[APFel]

That is an incredibly inaccurate description of the ID position. Perhaps you should watch the debate.

APf

[fishtank]

You could start by reading this entire post here:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3117912/posts

“Information Theory—part 1: overview of key ideas (article)”.

Then you could get a copy of Werner Gitt’s book, write a rebuttal to it, get it published, present and/or debate the issue live in a few dozen places, and that would be a good start.