Posted on 01/24/2018 8:30:40 AM PST by 3161J410
Fox News Interview: (start at 1:40)[Transcript] We have been investigating the Clinton e-mail scandal since 2015. We pretty well dropped it after the election, pretty much at the direction of President Trump who said "We don't prosecute people we beat in elections"...
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
What if they break the law? Do they just get a pass?
Very noble of him. But hillary, bammy, holder, and their cohorts should all be in jail for life.
Of course we don’t prosecute people BECAUSE they lost.
But we should prosecute people who commit treason either before and/or after they lost.
Agree. Since when?
Also, I would point out that Trump did not beat Bill, Chelsea, 0vomit, Comey, etc., etc., etc.
Yes, I’d love to see Hitlery in prison, but I’d be willing to overlook her so long as we lock up every single other person in the 0vomit administration, the BJ administration, and in the Deep State.
You should when they are an endless pain in the @ss and keep trying to destroy you. If they won’t go away quietly send them away.
Amen.
“We” didn’t used to try to prosecute people who beat us in elections either, but here we are...
So perpetually run for office and lose to avoid any culpability for anything?
Ignoring a problem just invites more of the same.......
Johnson’s a wuss
The bad optics are worth considering. Actually, it’s a win if Republicans in Congress grow a pair and go after the Clinton cabal. That can’t be portrayed as vindictiveness by Trump, since most of the GOP on the Hill was never pro-Trump to begin with.
“We don’t prosecute people we beat in elections”...
_________________________________________________
This is so irrelevant to the discussions we are having today. Dumb moron needs to stay on topic.
Like the FBI scheme; the FISA memo; and dozens of other possible crimes the ‘Rats committed.
Since always. Doesn’t sell well to the public, they expect gracious winners who get on with the job of governing and not waste time on revenge.
If they break the law we do.
True. But the child sex stuff greatly mitigates the optics. The media can be relied upon to defend any Democrat action aimed at winning the election. Gotta praise 'em for being true competitors who will do anything to win, right??
But as soon as Team Hillary gets tied to child prostitution, that whole game changes. You have to prosecute that. How can you not? At that point, it's bad optics to let the scum get away with it.
We don’t prosecute people we beat in elections
But we will let the Losers try to Prosecute the Winner with fraudulent and false evidence they themselves created.
Who is frikkin idiot that wrote this tripe? must be a Senator or something to be this dumb.
Dems want to prosecute a person who won an election whether or not they find evidence of wrongdoing.
Rs need to get a clue. It will not be a fair fight as long as they insist on looking fair to the left (which the left will never think unless they go full-Lindsey while claiming to still be conservative).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.