“I am thinking in particular of his efforts with regard to a living ecumenism, his commitment to interreligious and intercultural dialogue, and the Global Ethic Foundation he founded, with its important research and projects on peace, justice, and the integrity of creation.”
I strongly disagreed with him.
That’s a polite way to say heretic.
He offered up argument after argument attempting to prove God exists. Only to counter each with a skeptic's view.
In the end, he decided that the only way to know that God exists is to have a personal encounter with Him.
I disagree, the evidence is around us in all creation including our wonderfully made bodies and the intricate mechanics of even a single cell. Proof is also in the prophecies, some of which have come true recently with the restoration of Israel. And there is evidence of miracles.
I can't refute the logic of his arguments. Someone who wants to remain a skeptic will find a way. For that person, a personal encounter may be the only solution, and even then they may choose to remain skeptical.