Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senator Perata Proposes Nickle Tax on Bullets
KTVU/Fox2 News ^ | 3/28/02 | Randy Shandobil

Posted on 03/29/2002 2:03:40 PM PST by gc4nra

Political Editor Randy Shandobil for KTVU Channel 2 News

Target practice could soon get a lot more expensive. Next week a Bay Area state senator will formally propose a five-cent-a-bullet sales tax. Not five percent, but a nickel for each and every round.

Shoot a small caliber weapon, such as a .22? That more than doubles the price of your ammo.

Sen. Don Perata/(D) Oakland : "I will be attacked by those who hate gun control. I know that. As soon as this airs, I am going to start getting nasty phone calls and email."

Senator Don Perata is a gun control crusader. But he says his tax idea is not meant to deter gun use, but rather to raise money to save California's hospital trauma centers, some of which are going under.

"Bullets cause injuries that are expensive to treat and generally speaking, the public is footing the bill."

Perata wants the legislature to put the tax idea on the November ballot.

Peter Buxtun/NRA Member: "This idea is stupidity."

National Rifle Association member Peter Buxtun says previous gun control measures by Senator Perata put many gun dealers out of business, and he says a nickel a bullet tax would just lead to ammo smuggling. Buxtun: "People would go to Oregon, they would go to Nevada and they would load up the trunks of their car or their whole van and bring tons of ammunition in."

At the Jackson Arms Shooting Range in South San Francisco today, most customers did not want to talk on camera... but everyone said the tax would be unfair. They don't shoot people, they shoot targets.

Sen. Perata: "I am sorry. You cannot screen them out. The same way that someone with a perfect driving record is going to be upset that they pay an added cost for emergency care."

Democrats control both the state senate and the state assembly, so Senator Perata is confident a majority of lawmakers will support the tax. But that doesn't mean it will qualify for the November ballot.

For a ballot measure to qualify, two thirds of the legislature has to say yes, not a simple majority.

Buxtun: "We'll absolutely fight this as hard as we can."

If it does qualify, it could become a hot button issue in the Governor's race. Aides to Republican Bill Simon, who earns an A rating from the NRA, say he would be against it. Governor Davis is taking no position yet. He has signed many gun control bills, but says he's against tax hikes.

-- Political Editor Randy Shandobil, KTVU Channel 2 News

© 2002 KTVU-TV


TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Government
KEYWORDS: bullettax; calgov2002; idiot; perata; racism; secondamendment
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-180 next last
Here we go again CA Freepers!

Perata is the same guy that brought us SB23(the so called "Assault Weapons" ban)

OBTW, he has his CCW, can we say Limousine Liberal boys anfd girls! Click here for the story

1 posted on 03/29/2002 2:03:40 PM PST by gc4nra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: AnnaZ; Mercuria; rebuildus; Cortez; abigail2; HangFire; Lady Jenn; Outraged; Kithlyara...
ping!
2 posted on 03/29/2002 2:08:45 PM PST by gc4nra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gophack; TheAngryClam; BibChr; CalGov2002; Brad's Gramma; Dan from Michigan; broomhilda; .38sw
ping!
3 posted on 03/29/2002 2:10:05 PM PST by gc4nra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: gc4nra
Sen. Don Perata/(D) Oakland ..Isn't OAKCRAPLAND a Communist city of REP . LEE?
4 posted on 03/29/2002 2:10:22 PM PST by KQQL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gc4nra,Travis McGee,Squantos
I will be attacked by those who hate gun control. I know that.

I'll reserve my comments.

5 posted on 03/29/2002 2:10:33 PM PST by pocat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gc4nra
Reload your ammo! Is he going to tax primers, powder, and projectiles?
6 posted on 03/29/2002 2:12:37 PM PST by nomad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gc4nra
Taxes on bullets isn't a bad thing, if the funds would be applied to costs associated with fire arms by the government. They were used quite oftain in the past as a state would know something was up if more people started buying swords and other weapons, a sign of unrest. Although I must admit a nickel a bullet is a tad extreame.
7 posted on 03/29/2002 2:14:12 PM PST by Brellium
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pocat,45Auto
BLOAT, cache, and Take Names!

(Here's one more name for the hall of shame.)

8 posted on 03/29/2002 2:14:14 PM PST by Travis McGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: codebreaker;sirgawain; SLB; GEC, gundog; harpseal; DWSUWF; Wild Game; Fiddlstix...
ping!
9 posted on 03/29/2002 2:14:57 PM PST by gc4nra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gc4nra
Just bought a box of 550 [10% extra, free!] for $9.95.

Add .05 X 500 and it becomes $34.95.

Maybe 5000 22s is a lifetime supply. Then add the .45s. They might collect $250 tax over 50 years on the 22s, and $20 per year from the .45s, and that is from just one person. Multiply that by all the others who would pay such a tax. Obviously this will swell state coffers to an amazing degree. We're talking tens of dollars.

10 posted on 03/29/2002 2:15:52 PM PST by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KQQL
Sen. Don Perata/(D) Oakland ..Isn't OAKCRAPLAND a Communist city of REP . LEE?

No, she's up the road in Berkeley!

11 posted on 03/29/2002 2:16:14 PM PST by gc4nra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: gc4nra
Note how it's never "to control guns"... it's "to protect the children", or in this case, it's "to help the hospitals".

I've said it before, and I'll say it again, as long as I can say it: every gun owner should buy a box of ammo for each gun he owns, every single month of the year.

When the gun-grabbers come, they won't go for the guns, they'll go for the ammo. This jerk is just the harbinger.

12 posted on 03/29/2002 2:16:54 PM PST by Own Drummer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gc4nra
I have a better idea. How about a nickel per pound tax on verbal flatulence. Idiots like Perata could turn out to the goldmine that balances the federal budget.

Seriously, lunatics like this one are a standing threat to the Bill of Rights, and every freedom we enjoy. They would tax into oblivion everything they disagree with.

13 posted on 03/29/2002 2:17:00 PM PST by ZULU
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brellium
Forget the nickel, that's the "camel's nose".

If crime is not magically stopped after the nickel tax, (It won't be, and Perata knows it as well as we do), then it will be even easier to raise the existing tax to fifty cents or five dollars a bullet.

And of course, possession of an "untaxed bullet" would be subject to mandatory minimum prison terms.

14 posted on 03/29/2002 2:17:31 PM PST by Travis McGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: gc4nra
Good work gc, thanks for the ping;-)
15 posted on 03/29/2002 2:17:39 PM PST by HangFire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
Unconstitutional - but since when has that stopped these petty little tyrants? This madness is currently confined to California - but it will spread like an incurable virus to the whole country if these bastards are succesful here. They are setting the stage for some very ugly times - they know not what they do - or maybe they know very well what they do.
16 posted on 03/29/2002 2:18:02 PM PST by 45Auto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: pocat
This socialist is following in the footsteps of Salman Rushdie's effort at a second book ......."Buddah Su*ks"..............bad publicity move didn't help Salman's popularity either.

Stay Safe !

17 posted on 03/29/2002 2:18:43 PM PST by Squantos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
Forget the quoted nickel! If it's a nickel this year, it can and will be ten a bucks round in a few years.
18 posted on 03/29/2002 2:19:08 PM PST by Travis McGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: gc4nra
Ever since Los Angeles passed a law by Councilman Mike Feuer (rhymes with 'der Fuherer') which required purchasers of ammunition to provide a fingerprint, I have purchased all my ammunition on-line. One of my favorites is Cascade Ammunition.

I will never give Mr. Feuer a thumbprint, although I do reserve the right to use another finger.

Ammunition (still) is legal to purchase by phone, fax, internet, e-mail, snail mail, smoke signal, and carrier pigeon. Brought to your door by your friendly UPS man.

--Boris

19 posted on 03/29/2002 2:20:44 PM PST by boris
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brellium
Taxes on bullets isn't a bad thing,

Every tax is a bad thing. I'll never pay a tax on bullets until people take heed of Joslyn Elders' recommendation to make safer bullets.

20 posted on 03/29/2002 2:21:39 PM PST by Renatus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-180 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson