Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Davis at it again
The Orange County Register ^ | 4/26/02 | Editorial Staff

Posted on 04/26/2002 10:23:54 AM PDT by socal_parrot

Edited on 04/14/2004 10:05:09 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last
To: socal_parrot
Thanks for posting this.

Too many people are saying that Davis has put us in debt of 22 Billion.

This quote shows that Facist Davis had spend to over spend at least $35 billion to put us into the $22 billion Debt. A free-spending Davis helped turn a $13 billion surplus into a $22 billion projected deficit in about two years.

ABORT DAVIS, THE $35 BILLION DISASTER!

21 posted on 04/26/2002 12:54:59 PM PDT by Grampa Dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: socal_parrot;Bommer;Grampa Dave
See 'link' and quote in reply #19.(If you haven't already)
22 posted on 04/26/2002 1:03:20 PM PDT by d14truth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RonDog;generalissimoduane
SAYS: It's Friday. Have a nice weekend and thank you for your support.
23 posted on 04/26/2002 1:08:17 PM PDT by d14truth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach;Grampa Dave
Alameda Times Star, April 24, 2002-School Shortfall $830 million.

Davis says worst-case scenario just got worse
By Alexa Haussler

"SACRAMENTO -- Already strapped with a ballooning deficit, California will be required to pay $830 million more than expected for schools next fiscal year, Legislative Analyst Elizabeth Hill said Tuesday. The news comes a day after Hill warned the state's budget hole could swell to more than $20 billion -- or one-fifth of the state budget -- this year and next because revenues in April have dipped billions below forecasts."

24 posted on 04/26/2002 1:37:55 PM PDT by d14truth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: d14truth
DUMP DAVIS!
25 posted on 04/26/2002 1:54:34 PM PDT by Gophack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
What a minute!!!!! Just yesterday it was $20 billion, where did $22 billion come from? Is somebody just pulling numbers out of the air? If so, Wall Street and the bond rating agencies are not going to be happy! Davis and the State are undertaking a very dangerous and serious game and playing it badly.
26 posted on 04/26/2002 3:12:16 PM PDT by Robert357
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: socal_parrot
I would point out that the majority of Americans of Japanese decent were citizens who were deprivred of their property and liberty without the benefit of due process. They were forced into camps that where surronded by barbed wire and machine gun towers simply because of their ancestry. A most shamefull epsiode in American History.

Regards

alfa6 ;>}

27 posted on 04/26/2002 3:19:23 PM PDT by alfa6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alfa6
I have no problem with paying reparations to the Japanese who were interned during WWII. Never said I did.
28 posted on 04/26/2002 3:26:05 PM PDT by socal_parrot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: socal_parrot
Don't worry, Pacific Islanders get preferential treatment when applying for a government job. [True]

Now that California is a majority minority state

Huh??

29 posted on 04/26/2002 3:30:09 PM PDT by snopercod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: socal_parrot
From the comment you made after the article I inferred that you were critical of the reparations that were paid to the surviving Americans of Japanese ancestry for thier interment during WWII.

While the situation between the Americans of Japanese ancestry during WWII and slavery have some similarities the differences are vast and many. If an apology is due please consider it rendered.

Regards

alfa6 ;>}

30 posted on 04/26/2002 4:33:28 PM PDT by alfa6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; SierraWasp; Carry_Okie; Snopercod
What voters do not ever understand is that robbers like Davis can be recalled. We know about impeachment, where are the heck are our legislators? Clicking their fangs as they chomp on your tax dollars?
31 posted on 04/26/2002 4:49:12 PM PDT by Angelique
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Angelique;SierraWasp;Grampa Dave
Wasn't Rose Bird recalled? Oops, no, here it is. She was "not retained". See, it's possible.

Rose Bird and the Death Penalty

In 1977, Democratic Governor Jerry Brown appointed Rose Bird as chief justice of California. Bird was the first woman chief justice and, in fact, the first woman ever appointed to the court. Bird had no judicial experience. She had worked as a public defender and had impressed Brown as head of California’s Department of Agriculture. Although he considered her highly qualified, she barely squeaked by her retention election in 1978, gaining just 51.7 percent of the vote.

That same year, voters overwhelmingly passed a death-penalty initiative. In subsequent years, 59 defendants sentenced under this death-penalty law appealed their cases to the Supreme Court. In each case, Bird voted to overturn the sentence. A majority of the court sided with Bird in all but three of these cases. These decisions drew heavy criticism. Many accused the court of thwarting the will of the people. In 1986, six justices of the Supreme Court, including Bird, faced a retention election. Supporters of the death penalty campaigned to remove three justices—Bird, Joseph Grodin (a former professor of labor law), and Cruz Reynoso (the first Latino on the court). All three had been appointed by Brown. Grodin and Reynoso had only voted to uphold death sentences in three cases.

No justice in California had ever lost a retention election, but this campaign caught fire. A crime victims organization enlisted people across the state to ring doorbells. The California District Attorneys Association opposed the justices. Anti-Bird literature flooded voters’ mailboxes. The campaign gained the support of many in the business community who did not like the justices because of what they considered a pro-consumer bias. Republican Governor George Deukmejian, running for re-election, constantly attacked Bird and the two other justices as “liberals” lacking “impartiality and objectivity.” His Democratic opponent, Tom Bradley, refused to take sides. Bird aired a series of commercials, but refrained from getting involved in a discussion about the death penalty. Her commercials focused on the importance of an independent judiciary. She stated: “Judges with a backbone are a California tradition worth keeping.” Although the three justices had support within the legal community, anti-Bird forces vastly outspent their supporters. All three justices lost, and the newly re-elected Governor Deukmejian appointed three justices in their place.

Maybe the voters of California should give Gray "The Bird", eh?

32 posted on 04/26/2002 5:12:28 PM PDT by snopercod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Angelique
Davis can be recalled

If Davis is recalled, then Lt. Gov. Bustamante becomes governor until a recall election.

While a successful recall would stop Davis' dangerous and harmful decisions, the recall/impeachment would make little difference because the election is coming up soon. Also, the democrat-controlled legislature would not be interested in booting Davis, who signs into law and promotes most of their agenda.
We need Bill Simon to stop this charade.

33 posted on 04/26/2002 5:18:04 PM PDT by heleny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: snopercod
Give Davis the bird by ABORTING HIM WITH YOUR VOTES!
34 posted on 04/26/2002 11:54:33 PM PDT by Grampa Dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Gophack;teacher;all
Bringing this one back to life in view of the 'teacher union shakedown' by 'Doofus'.


SAYS: Teachers deserve a better deal than their 'unions' and students are giving them. Performance deserves rewards, not participation.

35 posted on 05/02/2002 10:54:52 AM PDT by d14truth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson