Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Davis ousts aide in Oracle flap, Advisor took check while negotiating tech deal
The SF Chronicle ^ | 5/3/02 | Robert Salladay

Posted on 05/03/2002 7:23:46 AM PDT by randita

Davis ousts aide in Oracle flap

CAMPAIGN DONATION: Adviser took check while negotiating tech deal

DOCUMENT SEARCH: Several state departments told to halt shredding

Robert Salladay, Chronicle Sacramento Bureau

Friday, May 3, 2002

Sacramento -- Gov. Gray Davis forced his chief technology adviser to resign Thursday after he admitted meeting an Oracle lobbyist at a bar and accepting a $25,000 check for the governor's campaign while negotiations over an Oracle software contract were taking place.

Arun Baheti resigned unexpectedly on a day in which Oracle offered to cancel the controversial $95 million contract with California, state police snooped out allegations of document shredding and Republicans intensified their efforts to make the scandal a campaign issue.

Baheti's departure as California's director of e-government was punctuated by the governor's suspension of Elias Cortez, the embattled director of the Department of Information Technology and a chief cheerleader for the Oracle contract.

The governor's office also dispatched the California Highway Patrol to Cortez's office to "secure all shredders and trash." Davis' chief lawyer said he received a report that documents were being shredded in the department, and four other technology and contracting departments were ordered to stop routine shredding and retain their documents.

The shredding in Cortez's office -- whether routine or not -- and the shakeup in the Davis administration coincided with a Republican assault on the governor and his aides for their part in approving the no-bid Oracle contract for database software.

The May 2001 contract could saddle taxpayers with up to $41 million in extra costs for software few state agencies say they need, the state auditor reported. Barry Keene, the director of General Services who signed the contract, was pressured into resigning last week, and the Legislature is poised to abolish the information technology office.

"Today's reports raise legitimate questions about whether this is more than just incompetence, but possibly corruption," said Republican candidate Bill Simon, who is running against Davis. "People are starting to ask, at what point does this become a coverup?"

FEDERAL PROBE SOUGHT

Assembly Republicans asked Thursday for a federal investigation into the contracting scandal.

The governor repeatedly denied that campaign contributions are linked to his executive decisions. But Baheti's acceptance of a $25,000 check for the governor's re-election campaign amid the Oracle negotiations is likely to compound the perception that Davis does favors for contributors -- an allegation Davis' chief political adviser says is ridiculous.

Baheti said he was approached by Oracle's Sacramento lobbyist, Ravi Mehta, about Oracle making a contribution to the governor's campaign some time before the contract was signed, top-level Capitol sources said. Baheti said he did not solicit the contribution, the sources said.

Baheti and Mehta met later at a Capitol-area bar and exchanged the check, which Baheti sent by Federal Express to the governor's campaign office in Los Angeles, the sources said.

Even though the exchange came after work hours, Davis administration employees are not allowed to handle campaign checks for the governor.

"It is certainly a violation of the spirit of the governor's policy from Day One that he does not want full-time state employees involved in our fund- raising efforts," said Garry South, the governor's chief political adviser.

There is some question, sources said, about when Baheti actually received the check from Oracle. The date on the check is from March, two months before the Oracle contract was signed, but the campaign received the check on June 5 - - five days after the contract was approved.

South denied that there was any connection between the contribution and the Oracle deal. "The governor had nothing to do with the Oracle contract, and the governor didn't know about the check. He doesn't know about the checks coming in here on a daily basis," he said.

And an Oracle spokesman, Jim Finn, also said there was no link: "There is no connection between our political contributions and our sales activities. They are kept entirely separate."

ORACLE MIGHT UNDO DEAL

Finn said Oracle offered Thursday to rescind the $95 million contract with the state, even though the Redwood City company continues to believe it will provide California with savings in the long run.

Finn said Oracle made a similar offer months ago but has not received a response from the state. Hilary McLean, a Davis spokeswoman, said the administration has asked the attorney general to review the contract but knew of no offer from Oracle to cancel the deal.

CONTRIBUTION IS LEGAL

There is nothing illegal about Baheti receiving a campaign check or Mehta offering the money.

Mehta is the former chairman of the Fair Political Practices Commission, the state's campaign watchdog. Mehta was appointed in 1995 by then-Gov. Pete Wilson, but fellow commissioners stripped him of power a year later amid charges of questionable travel expenses and doing private legal work for Wilson's chief of staff.

Mehta and Baheti did not return calls for comment.

Baheti was an advocate of the now-disastrous Oracle deal, and he attended a critical meeting on May 24, 2001, with top administration officials about last- minute negotiations. Baheti has said so-called Enterprise Licensing Agreements similar to the one signed with Oracle are a good way to consolidate state contracts to save money.

But Baheti wrote in his resignation letter that he didn't examine the Oracle contract closely enough.

"It is apparent in retrospect that I should have more vociferously raised questions about the details" of the Oracle contract, Baheti wrote. "Had I asked more questions of DOIT and DGS (Department of General Services), they might have seen potential problems. For that, I must take responsibility."

Baheti's resignation letter does not mention the Oracle contribution or Mehta.

PHOTO ORDER DREW FIRE

A former managing director of the California Democratic Party and campaign worker for Davis, Baheti has run the office of e-government, which recently faced criticism for ordering about 100 state agencies to put Davis' photograph on their Web sites.

Baheti's office has been revamping the state's Internet portals and search engines to make them more "user friendly," he said, but Republicans called the plastering of Davis' face on every Web site a "campaign ploy."

Baheti's resignation was announced along with the suspension until further notice of Cortez, who Davis administration officials claim misled them into believing the Oracle contract had been thoroughly analyzed. Cortez has been called to testify Monday before a legislative audit committee.

Barry Goode, the governor's chief counsel, said Thursday that he immediately called the information technology office when he heard of the possible shredding, asked officials there to determine if any shredding had taken place and, "if so, to cease immediately."

Goode also called Attorney General Bill Lockyer to report the potential problem. "While we had no conclusive evidence that any shredding or destruction of documents occurred," Goode said, "the mere suggestion that it may have occurred has led us to take these steps."

Lockyer said he has asked a team of special agents, computer forensic specialists and attorneys from the criminal law division to remove equipment and paperwork from Cortez's 69-person office "to preserve evidence in our investigation."

ALL 24 SHREDDERS UNPLUGGED

A spokesman for the Department of Information Technology said that when the department heard from Goode, employees unplugged all 24 shredders. Kevin Terpstra, the spokesman, said the shredders are used to destroy confidential information sent to the department by state agencies.

"We were not shredding any legal documents," Terpstra said, "or any documents that had been requested by the attorney general or by the Legislature or by the Bureau of State Audits or through public records requests from the press."

Lawmakers said they were astonished to hear the department was shredding anything amid its biggest scandal to date.

"I don't know what was in those documents, but it seems pretty clear to me that when you're a state agency, especially one that knows it's under the microscope, you don't shred documents unless you've got something to hide," said state Sen. Debra Bowen, D-Marina Del Rey, a chief critic of the technology office.

E-mail Robert Salladay at bsalladay@sfchronicle.com.

©2002 San Francisco Chronicle   Page A - 1  

 


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: calgov2002; davis; oracle; softwareflap
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last
the saga continues..
1 posted on 05/03/2002 7:23:46 AM PDT by randita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: calgov2002; ernest_at_the_beach
ping
2 posted on 05/03/2002 7:24:10 AM PDT by randita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gophack; Ernest at the Beach; ElkGroveDan; calgov2002
It's raining, it's pouring...
3 posted on 05/03/2002 7:25:11 AM PDT by eureka!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: randita
Someone at the Chronicle is definitely not happy about this. :-)
4 posted on 05/03/2002 7:25:59 AM PDT by Coop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: randita
I use Oracle at work.

I can see why they have to give kickbacks to get contracts.

5 posted on 05/03/2002 7:30:49 AM PDT by toast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: toast
Imagine that! Larry Ellison, CEO of Oracle, friend of Bill and Al, major major Democrat donor, can not head-off an investigation into Oracle. Perhaps the rumors that the FBI was ready to strike were true and Cal Attny General Lokyer is trying some damage control.
6 posted on 05/03/2002 7:34:56 AM PDT by gaspar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Comment #7 Removed by Moderator

To: randita
Oracle stock (ORCL) isn't too hot these days either. It's breaking major support at $8.50 on the downside and headed to $6, maybe even $4. Maybe we can get rid of Davis AND Clinton lover Ellison at the same time!
8 posted on 05/03/2002 7:39:56 AM PDT by Commiewatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: randita
Even though the exchange came after work hours, Davis administration employees are not allowed to handle campaign checks for the governor. "It is certainly a violation of the spirit of the governor's policy from Day One that he does not want full-time state employees involved in our fund- raising efforts," said Garry South, the governor's chief political adviser. There is some question, sources said, about when Baheti actually received the check from Oracle. The date on the check is from March, two months before the Oracle contract was signed, but the campaign received the check on June 5 - - five days after the contract was approved.

The classic evidence of a quid pro quo. The paper can only distort the event by using the headline and analysis to make it appear that Davis is part of the solution when its obvious this was part of an accepted scheme for his appointees.

9 posted on 05/03/2002 7:45:26 AM PDT by KC Burke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: toast
I use Oracle at work. I can see why they have to give kickbacks to get contracts.

What other DB would you choose if you could? Not sarcasm, but just an inquiry from a fellow database admin/user.

10 posted on 05/03/2002 7:47:05 AM PDT by egarvue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: randita; all
Somewhat off the wall question..If, for whatever reason, Davis decided NOT to seek re-election....who would be the presumptive favorite for the Dem nomination?...
11 posted on 05/03/2002 7:49:30 AM PDT by ken5050
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gaspar
Wasn't Joe "professional liar" Lockhart working for Oracle after his stint in the Clinton Admin? Where is he now?
12 posted on 05/03/2002 7:49:53 AM PDT by Tijeras_Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: randita
The SF Chomical's version of this is much more detailed then th AP version in our local fish wrap the Times-Standard(know as the Sub-Standard). Also the AP is reporting a 5 BILLION dollar short fall in income tax revenue, down from 11.5 billion last year and 2 billion under Gov Doofus' estimate of 9 billion.
13 posted on 05/03/2002 8:03:48 AM PDT by tubebender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: randita;Grampa Dave;Carry_Okie; SierraWasp; Gophack; eureka!; ElkGroveDan...
Thanks for the ping and the article!

Davis seems to be taking the LLA Slimes advice on dealing with this .. uh ..challege.

calgov2002:

calgov2002: for old calgov2002 articles. 

calgov2002: for new calgov2002 articles. 

Other Bump Lists at: Free Republic Bump List Register



14 posted on 05/03/2002 8:13:37 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: randita; all
Remember folks if this were a Republican administration this would already be called ORACLEGATE.

I'm sure it was just an oversight by the press. It didn't occur to them.

What say we, Freepers? Lets remind them. Use it in our headlines and our letters to the editor; ORACLEGATE!

15 posted on 05/03/2002 8:17:37 AM PDT by ElkGroveDan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nimc
Here it is. The $25,000 check thingy...
16 posted on 05/03/2002 8:24:08 AM PDT by eureka!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Tijeras_Slim
I believe that "Popeye" Lockhart is still Oracle Director of Communications.
17 posted on 05/03/2002 8:30:53 AM PDT by gaspar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: gaspar
Imagine that! Larry Ellison, CEO of Oracle, friend of Bill and Al, major major Democrat donor, can not head-off an investigation into Oracle.

And Ellison was one of Microsoft's biggest critics, too. You now REALLY openly wonder just how much under-the-table money Oracle gave to the Clinton Administration to expedite the US v. Microsoft case.

18 posted on 05/03/2002 8:48:05 AM PDT by RayChuang88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: randita; eureka!
This whole thing stinks. For Davis to claim that he didn't know about all this is ridiculous. A $25,000 check prompts thank you notes, often personal, and his campaign committee should have been alert that a state employee had in fact sent the check to them and alerted the campaign manager or Davis' chief of staff to find out what is what. This wasn't a little $100 donation, or even a $1000 donation that may gone under the radar screen.

Davis is a micromanager. Nothing goes on without his explicit approval. He can't have it both ways. Either he's stupid or corrupt, and I don't think he's stupid.

Dump Davis!

19 posted on 05/03/2002 9:01:44 AM PDT by Gophack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gophack; ErnestattheBeach; ElkGroveDan
Agreed. He is corrupt. Dan Walters had a piece months ago about a federal corruption/bribery case where certain records were sealed. (I think the bad guy was Nathan or Nathanson or somesuch). In any event, it involved the Coastal Commission and big $$$ for approval of developers' projects. The Sac Bee was trying to unseal the records because there was a "major unnamed politician" neck deep, the speculation being Grayout. His "John Doe" attorney on behalf of "John Doe" filed a federal action to keep the records sealed. I did not book mark the article and searched one day for an hour and couldn't find it. If my memory is correct, it would be sweet to see that bust open in the next couple of months....
20 posted on 05/03/2002 9:08:35 AM PDT by eureka!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson