Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Physicist to Present New Exact Solution of Einstein's Gravitational Field Equation [Anti-Gravity!]
PhysOrg.com ^ | 11 February 2006 | Staff

Posted on 02/11/2006 4:31:06 PM PST by PatrickHenry

On Tuesday, Feb. 14, noted physicist Dr. Franklin Felber will present his new exact solution of Einstein's 90-year-old gravitational field equation to the Space Technology and Applications International Forum (STAIF) in Albuquerque. The solution is the first that accounts for masses moving near the speed of light.

New antigravity solution will enable space travel near speed of light by the end of this century, he predicts.

Felber's antigravity discovery solves the two greatest engineering challenges to space travel near the speed of light: identifying an energy source capable of producing the acceleration; and limiting stresses on humans and equipment during rapid acceleration.

"Dr. Felber's research will revolutionize space flight mechanics by offering an entirely new way to send spacecraft into flight," said Dr. Eric Davis, Institute for Advanced Studies at Austin and STAIF peer reviewer of Felber's work. "His rigorously tested and truly unique thinking has taken us a huge step forward in making near-speed-of-light space travel safe, possible, and much less costly."

The field equation of Einstein's General Theory of Relativity has never before been solved to calculate the gravitational field of a mass moving close to the speed of light. Felber's research shows that any mass moving faster than 57.7 percent of the speed of light will gravitationally repel other masses lying within a narrow 'antigravity beam' in front of it. The closer a mass gets to the speed of light, the stronger its 'antigravity beam' becomes.

Felber's calculations show how to use the repulsion of a body speeding through space to provide the enormous energy needed to accelerate massive payloads quickly with negligible stress. The new solution of Einstein's field equation shows that the payload would 'fall weightlessly' in an antigravity beam even as it was accelerated close to the speed of light.

Accelerating a 1-ton payload to 90 percent of the speed of light requires an energy of at least 30 billion tons of TNT. In the 'antigravity beam' of a speeding star, a payload would draw its energy from the antigravity force of the much more massive star. In effect, the payload would be hitching a ride on a star.

"Based on this research, I expect a mission to accelerate a massive payload to a 'good fraction of light speed' will be launched before the end of this century," said Dr. Felber. "These antigravity solutions of Einstein's theory can change our view of our ability to travel to the far reaches of our universe."

More immediately, Felber's new solution can be used to test Einstein's theory of gravity at low cost in a storage-ring laboratory facility by detecting antigravity in the unexplored regime of near-speed-of-light velocities.

During his 30-year career, Dr. Felber has led physics research and development programs for the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marine Corps, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, the Defense Threat Reduction Agency, the Department of Energy and Department of Transportation, the National Institute of Justice, National Institutes of Health, and national laboratories. Dr. Felber is Vice President and Co-founder of Starmark.

Source: Starmark [Felber's own firm, apparently]


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: cosmology; gravity; physics; podkletnov
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-223 next last
I donno about this one, but Dr. Felber seems like he's had a responsible career.
1 posted on 02/11/2006 4:31:08 PM PST by PatrickHenry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro; Junior; longshadow; RadioAstronomer; Doctor Stochastic; js1138; Shryke; RightWhale; ...
SciencePing
An elite subset of the Evolution list.
See the list's explanation at my freeper homepage.
Then FReepmail to be added or dropped.

2 posted on 02/11/2006 4:32:15 PM PST by PatrickHenry (Virtual Ignore for trolls, lunatics, dotards, scolds, & incurable ignoramuses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

This article was posted next year.


3 posted on 02/11/2006 4:32:35 PM PST by REDWOOD99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

Sure. What news. I can just see flying cars in the future. Not a happy thought for anyone in Hampton Roads who has to contend with the drivers from h$ll here.


4 posted on 02/11/2006 4:33:05 PM PST by OpusatFR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

You wonder why the Klingons have not paid us a visit, then.


5 posted on 02/11/2006 4:33:12 PM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

Human travel near the speed of light has already been proven and demonstrated countless times already by the French when they retreat.


6 posted on 02/11/2006 4:33:34 PM PST by Screamname (My name is Uninterested Kevin, monkey cousin of Curious George.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
Felber's research shows that any mass moving faster than 57.7 percent of the speed of light will gravitationally repel other masses lying within a narrow 'antigravity beam' in front of it. The closer a mass gets to the speed of light, the stronger its 'antigravity beam' becomes.

Oh??? If that is truly the case, one of the big barriers to FTL/near C travel vanishes. That was hitting individual atoms at that speed would generate a lethal shower of X-rays and secondary particles.

7 posted on 02/11/2006 4:36:49 PM PST by null and void (<---- Aged to perfection, and beyond...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

The jury is still out on whether Einstein's equations on general relativity were right, though. That's why they sent up a sattelite last year to test them.



Special relativity is the one that has been proven beyond any reasonable doubt.


8 posted on 02/11/2006 4:37:22 PM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

Man someday may travel at the speed of light, but bureaucracies will still require at least 30 days to investigate customer complaints.


9 posted on 02/11/2006 4:37:44 PM PST by silverleaf (Fasten your seat belts- it's going to be a BUMPY ride.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Screamname

ROTFLMAO!


10 posted on 02/11/2006 4:38:06 PM PST by Fiddlstix (Tagline Repair Service. Let us fix those broken Taglines. Inquire within(Presented by TagLines R US))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
A lot of science geeks are "folding"! For more info, please join us on this thread.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1572512/posts?q=1&&page=1#1

BCATS

11 posted on 02/11/2006 4:38:44 PM PST by Drango (A liberal's compassion is limited only by the size of someone else's wallet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

Well, I don't know anywhere near enough to realistically comment on this, but I'll zip an email to a theoretical physicist friend of mine and get his comments.

Long distance space travel would be real cool and I'll volunteer to be the first to go, one way or round trip.


12 posted on 02/11/2006 4:39:06 PM PST by furball4paws (Awful Offal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
Sit Down, Shut Up and Hold On cause HERE WE GO AGAIN, AGAIN, AGAIN, AGAIN, AGAIN...
13 posted on 02/11/2006 4:39:22 PM PST by Lancer_N3502A
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: REDWOOD99

"Beam me up, Scottie"


14 posted on 02/11/2006 4:40:27 PM PST by ANGGAPO (LayteGulfBeachClub)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

15 posted on 02/11/2006 4:42:53 PM PST by Lancer_N3502A
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
Paging Wendell Urth...

BTW, PH, is Physicist on your list? [From the title of the thread, it seems like we should congratulate him ;-) ]

Cheers!

16 posted on 02/11/2006 4:43:18 PM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

I was gonna do this, but I had to fertilize the lawn this weekend.


17 posted on 02/11/2006 4:44:49 PM PST by keithtoo (It's STILL not safe to vote Democrat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

I also dunno about this one. There are an infinite number of possible solutions. Einstein rejected a 5-dimensional solution because it didn't feel right, which if we might use Einstein's gut as a guide, makes solutions less than nessarily true even if they are exact.


18 posted on 02/11/2006 4:44:50 PM PST by RightWhale (pas de lieu, Rhone que nous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

NasaSpaceFlight.com is carrying the story, too...

An abstract from one of his papers on the subject (paper is readable in PDF)
http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0505098


Shows up in Nasa Daily, too... for Feb 10.

Looks fairly legit, not a crackpot physicist.


19 posted on 02/11/2006 4:46:34 PM PST by Knitting A Conundrum (Act Justly, Love Mercy, and Walk Humbly With God Micah 6:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
I donno about this one, but Dr. Felber seems like he's had a responsible career.

I just object to the idea of referring to it as "The Felber Drive"..

" Cap'n, the Felbers are out, we canna escape the Darwinians ! "

" That strange feeling as we approach Light Speed is known as the Felber Effect.."

" We're approaching Felber Speed, Sir ! "

No, I don't like it.. I don't like it at all....

20 posted on 02/11/2006 4:46:50 PM PST by Drammach (In the kingdom of the blind, the one-eyed man is king..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-223 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson