Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

1999, 2000 Iraqi memos: Procurement of 50000 Aluminum Tubes That Can Be Used For URANIUM ENRICHMENT.
Pentagon/FMSO website for Iraq Pre-war documents ^ | April 24 2006 | jveritas

Posted on 04/24/2006 9:45:15 AM PDT by jveritas

This document CMPC-2004-004404 contains memos dated from 1999 and 2000 about Saddam regime procurements of 81 mm in Diameter, 900 mm in Lenght HIGH STRENGTH AND HIGH QUALITY ALUMINUM TUBES. As many of you know the issue of 81 mm High Strength, High Quality Aluminum Tubes were subject for an intensive debate since 2002 because this type of tubes can be used in GAS CENTRIFUGES FOR URANIUM ENRICHMENT. Although the Iraq Survey Group (ISG) said in its final report in 2004 the following about the procurement of these tubes “ Baghdad’s interest in high-strength, high-specification aluminum tubes—dual-use items controlled under Annex 3 of the Ongoing Monitoring and Verification Plan as possible centrifuge rotors—is best explained by its efforts to produce 81-mm rockets”. However the ISG could not prove definitively that these very special tubes were not used as part of Saddam Regime attempt to build its Nuclear Programs and Projects (see link to ISG report http://www.cia.gov/cia/reports/iraq_wmd_2004/chap4.html#sect6). In fact the ISG in its report says also the following “ The limited information found by ISG that ties Iraqi nuclear entities to the tubes also appears related to the 81-mm rocket program and the ISG report also says ” Purported high-level interest in aluminum tubes by Saddam and Iraq’s Deputy Prime Minister—a potential indicator of a program of national importance, such as a centrifuge program.. A 6 March 2003 letter from the Iraqi National Monitoring Directorate (NMD) to the IAEA’s Iraq Nuclear Verification Office (INVO) notes that the Iraqi Atomic Energy Commission (IAEC) conducted material composition testing on a sample aluminum tube in early 2001 and In another translated memo “http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1620262/posts ” that talks about a secret project by the Iraqi Atomic Energy Commission to re-instate the “Nuclear Reactor Simulators” using equipments from the “Old TAMUZ (OZIRAQ) Nuclear Reactor”. All this is a clear indication of Saddam intent to restart the Nuclear Programs.

I will translate the first two pages of this 11 pages document. The first two pages are the Quotation Bid regarding these Special Aluminum Tubes by a company called AL Bashair addressed to Al Rasheed General Company which is a division of the Iraqi Military Manufacturing Commission. Page 3 of the document has the Technical Specification written in English of these Aluminum tubes, Diameter, Length, Specification, Chemical Composition, Price, Manufacturing origin etc,,

Beginning of the Partial Translation of document CMPC-2004-004404

In the Name of God the Most Merciful The Most Compassionate

Al-Bashair Trading Co. LTD

Date: 2/11/1999

To: Al Rasheed General Company

Subject: Proposal

Following up to our two letters numbered T 2484 and T 2504 on 30/10 and 1/11/1999 consecutively and attached with it proposals numner/3 related to your invitation numbered (75/3/13) included is our forth proposal related to it:

Please study with the other proposals sent to by our letter above and inform us..

With Regards

Signature…

Mounir Mamdooh Awed

Acting Director

4/11/1999

Best Salute

Indicating to your overture addressed to us regarding the bid numbered (725/99) we are pleased to offer our proposal included and are shown its details of the Technical Specifications, Prices, and the required quantity by you.

Knowing that the cost of a single tube delivered to your respected company warehouses is estimated (105 dollar) one hundred and five American Dollars,

Please take in consideration the following issues:

1. The Manufacturing Origin of the tubes German/European.

2. The equipping will be achieved within a period of 8 months from the date to deposit the amount in our interest and in the order of partial shipments divided during the equipping period above, where the first shipment begins within four months from the period of equipping indicated above.

3. The quantity of tubes required for equipping is 50,000 Tubes.

We hope that our proposal will receive your approval… with the continuous corporation with you to serve the general interest… with regards

Attachments. Schedule of Technical Specifications with prices.

TUBE ALUMUNIUM ALLOY

1. SPECIFICATION: AL-ZN-MG-CU 215/ NO. 7075

2. DIMENSION OF TUBE:

Outside Diameter = 81.0 mm

Inside Diameter = 74.4 mm

Thickness = 3.3 mm

Length = 900 mm.

3. CHEMICAL COMPOSITION

NB ALL TUBES ARE SUBJECTED TO CHEMICAL COATNG IONADIZATION PROCESS TO PREVENT AND SUSTAIN SCRATCHES AND CORROSIONS.

4. PRICE: FOR EACH TUBE = USD 105

5. MANUFACTURING OF ORIGIN: GERMANY OR E.E.C


TOPICS: Breaking News
KEYWORDS: aluminumtubes; cmpc2004004404; germany; gnfi; iraq; iraqiintelligence; jveritas; prewardocs; prewarintelligence
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 241-242 next last
To: saganite
Interesting thread and true....but they may yet eat their words:

Semi-News: Saddam Memos Called 'Old News' by Major Media

Course in this case it is not a confession letter but a simple memo involved with procuring 50,000 tubes of high quality aluminum....

161 posted on 04/24/2006 3:41:39 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (History is soon Forgotten,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: jveritas; Shelayne

Well, I was just putting up links to documents that Shelayne had found....crdit due Shelayne.....She I presume.


162 posted on 04/24/2006 3:44:04 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (History is soon Forgotten,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; Shelayne

Great work Shelayne :)


163 posted on 04/24/2006 3:46:25 PM PDT by jveritas (Hate can never win elections.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: dinasour

Corner bump!!!!!!!!


164 posted on 04/24/2006 3:50:03 PM PDT by pittsburgh gop guy (Be not afraid...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: jw777

Yes, that was a great show.

Didn't the inspectors back in 2002 or 03 pick up a certain residue when checking the Iranian plants that lead them to believe they were processing for weapons grade material?


165 posted on 04/24/2006 4:10:49 PM PDT by headstamp (Nothing lasts forever, Unless it does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
"Now look at this:
SPECIFICATION: AL-ZN-MG-CU 215/ NO. 7075
We have an alloy with Zinc, Magnesium, Copper and aluminum...and of course Thickness = 3.3 mm
Isn't 3.3 mm a bit thin? And why the ingredients in the alloy?"

No according to what I am reading in the document I mentioned.
The alloyed tubing has a pretty high tensile strength as well as the fact it is a tube, so it will not bend quite so easily. The document blaster88 provides in this post, goes into all kinds of details as how intricate building such a system is. But that deviates from your question. Apparenntly this particular alloyed mix in tube form is sufficient for use in the system being discussed with the wall thickness specified. We have to remember, if it was used in the rotary parts of the unit it would have to be very light weight.
At any rate. It sure sounds like these tubes where really intended for use in centrifugal equipment and not as a rocket. Like some have indicated, why would one need such a high tensil strength tube for a small rocket that only had to travel a few miles. It would be pure waste of money.
They where waiting for sanctions to be lifted and get back into the swing of things both nuclear as well as biochemical.
166 posted on 04/24/2006 4:11:56 PM PDT by Marine_Uncle (Honor must be earned)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
"FROM what planet did you parachute into here?"
heheh. Go getem Erny.
167 posted on 04/24/2006 4:13:22 PM PDT by Marine_Uncle (Honor must be earned)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: headstamp

I don't recall that, but I was very intrigued when they showed how Khans ingenious process of cutting out several steps by using smaller tubes and how the show actually mentioned Iran and what we assume their enrichment facility looks like. I cannot find the name of that Show on the net. I have been looking for a couple hours.


168 posted on 04/24/2006 4:49:16 PM PDT by jw777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: freema

if my Mark I eyeball is correct these enrightment tubes from Libya share the same ration of dimensions as the Iraqi specifications I.E: 81mm by 900mm or roughly one wide by ten widths long.

Anyone of You math whizes think you can figure out the exact dimensions using the 2x4 in the box as a reference point. I don't do metric math that well.

169 posted on 04/24/2006 4:51:46 PM PDT by usmcobra (Those that are incited to violence by the sight of OUR flag are the enemies of this nation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Thanks for doing the links for me. I seem to be a little "technologically repressed". LOL.

Yes, I am a SHE. :^)


170 posted on 04/24/2006 4:54:29 PM PDT by Shelayne (Antique Media--losing value everyday...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: daviddennis

FYI, from what I read these type of tubes were used in the past (this specification but I don't think the same aluminum alloy) as the housing of a rocket. The missile body frame. Nothing to do with artillery as a launcher of a projectile and nothing to do with a missile launching platform, just the rocket itself, from what I read.


171 posted on 04/24/2006 4:56:17 PM PDT by RayRobisonblog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

:^) My pleasure.


172 posted on 04/24/2006 4:56:30 PM PDT by Shelayne (Antique Media--losing value everyday...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: Shelayne
Get those boys working on the technology....
173 posted on 04/24/2006 5:07:59 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (History is soon Forgotten,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: Zeppo; jveritas

Ping to #169


174 posted on 04/24/2006 5:30:07 PM PDT by freema (Proud Marine FRiend, Mom, Aunt, Sister, Friend, Wife, Daughter, Niece)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: usmcobra

Thanks, pinged it to Zeppo and jveritas.


175 posted on 04/24/2006 5:31:52 PM PDT by freema (Proud Marine FRiend, Mom, Aunt, Sister, Friend, Wife, Daughter, Niece)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: jw777

This it?

http://times.discovery.com/tvlistings/episode.jsp?episode=0&cpi=115528&gid=0&channel=DTC


176 posted on 04/24/2006 5:34:14 PM PDT by headstamp (Nothing lasts forever, Unless it does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: headstamp

YEAH> I think that was the program. Excellent. I'm glad someone else saw it.


177 posted on 04/24/2006 5:58:30 PM PDT by jw777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: jveritas
We are really having the argument that was in the 2002 NIE - whether Saddam was buying the tubes i beyond question - we knew that he was because we intercepted the shipments in transit. We knew who they came from, we knew where t€hey were going, we knew the amounts, the price, the specs - all of that. The Iraqis themselves owned up to the covert procurement - after they got caught. They said, oh, these are for rockets. Hans Blix was aware of the purchases, and he and UNSCOM thought they were for the rocket program.

Duelfer's report is that in the opinion of the CIA (ahem), they were for the rocket program, but there was certainly a lot of questionable activities centered around them, but that didn't prove anything.

It is true that Iraq used 81mm rockets, and they did have a performance problem with them. There isn't all that much information about what sort of problems they were having, but unless there were issues with rocket motor blowouts to the sides, I don't really see how the tensile strength of the aluminum (which is going to affect how it reacts while spinning) improves it. With more info on the rocket program, and the analysis of a rocket scientist, perhaps we might see that to be the case.

But the argument is not whether the tubes are suitable at ALL for use in centrifuges - of course they are. That's why they are on the NSG list to begin with. If these tubes had zero applicablity, then they wouldn't be controlled, and Iraq would not have had to purchase them covertly. Too often, the reporting makes it sound like "experts" have concluded that they COULD NOT be used in centrifuges. This simply cannot be true. What they concluded was that they were better suited for use in the rockets than in centrifuges - which is no doubt true.

But Iraq was under sanctions, and under watch. If they bought materials ideally suited for centrifuges, there would be no cover story if they got caught. That's why they operated many, many "dual use" facilities. (For example, they had plenty of castor oil plants. Byproducts of castor oil production are used to make ricin. The Iraqi story? Brake fluid. Of course, brake fluid hasn't been castor oil since WWII. But, hey, whose word are you going to take, nice, peaceful, Saddam in a box, or the evil Cheney and his puppet Bush?)

But back to the aluminum tubes. You can bet that we knew what AQ Khan's plans looked like before the ring was busted, and they included gas centrifuges made from non-ideal diameter aluminum tubes. Remember, these were all surreptitious programs, they had to use what they could get.

So to these documents - there may be nothing new here. Maybe they contain quantitities or orders that were unknown. I think this is the first time I have seen publicized what countries the suppliers were from. Germany is an NSG participant - certainly there are rogue companies and individuals, but this doesn't look good for them. Whether there is any new in them is going to be who signed them, and what directorate they came from. If it was from a group that was conventional weapons only, or was it one of those "dual use" groups where Iraqi nuclear scientist were keeping shop?

178 posted on 04/24/2006 6:23:56 PM PDT by blaster88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: blaster88
Agree 100% with your post. These documents about Saddam Regime Procurement of tens of thousands highly specialized Aluminum tube are not showing something we did not know, but they are the first publicized ones about one of the most debated and inconclusive issues of WMDs. No one can say for certainty that these tube were not going to be used for the Nuclear Program even if the ISG leaned prematurely that they were not.

To tell you the truth, the more I read the ISG report, the more I think they did not finish the job and it was kind of sloppy work they did. I hate to say this on a public forum, but when these guys only inspect one quarter of 1% of Iraq ammunitions, and only inspect in details 2 ammunition depots out of hundreds if not thousands, and conclude that there was no Chemical Weapons, then I think they did a lousy job.

PS: Do you know that out of hundreds of ammunition depots the ISG planned only to investigate just 11 but at the end they only investigated 2 in details, just 2, they could not even investigate the already extremely small number of ammunition depots (11) that they have planned to do !!!

179 posted on 04/24/2006 6:37:47 PM PDT by jveritas (Hate can never win elections.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]

To: usmcobra
Which dimensions are you looking for?

81 mm =3.19 inches.

900 mm = 35.43 inches.

1 inch =25.4 mm.

180 posted on 04/24/2006 6:43:53 PM PDT by jveritas (Hate can never win elections.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 241-242 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson