2001, 2002 Iraqi Memos: SECRET NUCLEAR PROJECT (Translation)

Pentagon/FMSO website Iraqi Pre-War documents ^ | April 23 2006 | jveritas

[jveritas]

This document CMPC-2004-000167 talks about a project that started in early 2001 by the Iraqi Atomic Energy Commission (IAEC) to use components from the previously destroyed TAMUZ (also known as OZIRAQ) Nuclear Reactor to build a Nuclear Simulator Reactor. The TAMUZ Nuclear Reactor was destroyed by an Israeli air attack in 1981. In September 2002, after almost a year and a half since the start of this Nuclear Project and when it became very clear to the Iraqi Regime that the UN inspectors were coming back to Iraq, a decision was made to stop this Nuclear Activity project. What is interesting in this document that the IAEC was warned by the Monitoring Directory within the IAEC that this Nuclear Project is prohibited by the UN resolutions however the IAEC went on with it until September 2002 only when the UN inspectors were on the verge of coming back to Iraq.

This document is yet another irrefutable proof that Saddam had never stopped his WMD activities and programs including Nuclear Program activities.

Beginning of Page 3 Translation of document CMPC-2004-000167

In the Name of God the Most Merciful The Most Compassionate

The Republic of Iraq

The Iraqi Atomic Energy Commission

To: The Respected Mr. Chairman of the Engineering Department

Subject: Simulation Reactor

An inspection was made to the suggested hall to build the Simulation Reactor and that contain recently laundry equipments (Laundry) and the hall was closed and the location abandoned and neglected for a long time and based on this it requires the following:

1. Remove all the laundry equipments and machines.

2. The structural division should inspect the hall and to repair and remodeling and fortify the building after determining the cost of these works.

3.Transfer the equipments and systems specialized in the control of 14 TAMUZ Reactor from storage 14a to the location of the hall and by phases.

4. Distribute the engineering and technical staff proposed for work in the project to the days of the week where engineer will be dedicated for one day.

5. Dedicate one of the technicians to fully work in the location.

6. Prepare the timeline schedule to finish the project and for the duration of a full year.

Please review and comment

With regards

Signature…

Adnan Salim Girgis

director of the Electronic Support Division

29/1/2001

End of translation of page 3

Beginning of the translation of page 9

In the Name of God the Most Merciful The Most Compassionate

The Republic of Iraq

The Iraqi Atomic Energy Commission

The Engineering Department

Number: 10/2/1000

Date: 1/9/2001

To: The Respected Mr. Chairman of the Comission

Subject: Simulation Reactor

Previously you instructed to re-install the Simulation Reactor. Please approve the delivery of hall that was dedicated for it and currently occupied by the Laundry to the Electronic Support Division with the dedication of 15 millions Dinar for the purpose of starting the work.

Please review and comment… with regards

Signature

Doctor Hisham Mahmood Ahmad

Chairman of the Engineering Department

End of translation of page 9

Page 11 of the document memo dated September 9 2001 that talks about the approval of Chairman of the IAEC to build the Nuclear Reactor Simulator

Now in page 7 of the document ( the order of the pages is not chronological) there is a secret memo dated May 30 2002, the Monitoring Department within the IAEC warned the IAEC that this Nuclear Program is totally prohibited by the UN resolutions.

In page 5 of the document there is a memo dated September 12 2002 asking the IAEC Engineering Department to stop working on this project because it is prohibited by the UN. Again it took the Iraqis almost a year and half to stop working on this Nuclear Project and only after they were absolutely convinced that the UN inspectors were returning to Iraq in matter of few months as they did indeed return in November 2002.

[jveritas]

Secret Nuclear Project in 2001 and 2002.

[jveritas]

PING

[Dog]

Keep plugging away Joseph...great work as always.

[Txsleuth]

Did you happen to watch the show 60 Minutes tonight??

They had on an ex CIA guy...that was adamant about the "fact" that Iraq NEVER tried to get uranium from Niger...and seemed equally adamant that there was no reason to believe that Saddam had any WMDs....when Bush was contemplating going to war.

[SittinYonder]

IraqDoc ping for eyespysomething who is putting a child to bed.

2001, 2002 Iraqi Memos: SECRET NUCLEAR PROJECT (Translation)

Release/Translation of Classified PreWar Docs ping. If you want to be added or removed to the ping list, please Freepmail me.

Please add the keyword prewardocs to any articles pertaining to this subject.

Operation Get The Truth Out

Operation Iraqi Freedom Documents

Documents from the Harmony Database

jveritas’s blog

Ray Robison’s blog

An Interview With a Citizen Translator and American Hero

[Bryan24]

Sir, you are truly doing a great service for our country.

Many thanks.

The truth of the matter is that we knew, by that I mean that common sense and intuition told us, that Saddam had not given up his WMD programs, because that was the only way he could be a force in the region. He is a megalomaniac. He has to have the power. The WMD programs would give him that power.

You are revealing, in writing, what we knew and what the Democrats deny out of their hatred of George Bush.

[jveritas]

Well this idiot needs to read some of the translated documents, and so do the hateful Left and their media. Even the few documents that has been translated are enough to expose all the lies that liberals and their media have been spewing for the last 3 years regarding Saddam WMD and his undisputed extremely strong connection to Terrorism.

[jveritas]

Thank you very much my fellow freeper. And an excellent comments about why Saddam always kept his WMD programs. The truth will eventually shine over the Democrats and their media and expose all their lies against President Bush and the war in Iraq.

[jveritas]

Thank you very much Dog.

[rwfromkansas]

bump

[jazusamo]

Another good find my FRiend. You are doing a fine job.


tonysnow@foxnews.com
Special@foxnews.com (Brit Hume)
Hannity@foxnews.com
Oreilly@foxnews.com
Studiob@foxnews.com (Shep Smith)
Hardball@msnbc.com
Imus@msnbc.com
Myword@foxnews.com (John Gibson)
Drudge@drudgereport.com
writemalkin@gmail.com
hhewitt@hughhewitt.com
rush@eibnet.com
Beltway@foxnews.com (Barnes & Kondracke)
Friends@foxnews.com
humanevents@humaneventsonline.com (Ann Coulter)
howiecarr@wrko.co
http://www.michaelmedved.com/askmike
http://intelligence.senate.gov/ (Senate Intelligence Committee)

[jveritas]

Thank you very much for all your support and showing the list of the media that need to be contacted.

[Calpernia]

This document CMPC-2004-000167 talks about a project that started in early 2001 by the Iraqi Atomic Energy Commission (IAEC) to use components from the previously destroyed TAMUZ (also known as OZIRAQ) Nuclear Reactor to build a Nuclear Simulator Reactor. The TAMUZ Nuclear Reactor was destroyed by an Israeli air attack in 1981. In September 2002, after almost a year and a half since the start of this Nuclear Project and when it became very clear to the Iraqi Regime that the UN inspectors were coming back to Iraq, a decision was made to stop this Nuclear Activity project. What is interesting in this document that the IAEC was warned by the Monitoring Directory within the IAEC that this Nuclear Project is prohibited by the UN resolutions however the IAEC went on with it until September 2002 only when the UN inspectors were on the verge of coming back to Iraq.

[Marine_Uncle]

Great work as usual J. A lot of folks probably are not aware, that when that flight of 8 F16's dropped their iron bombs on the dome of reactor I, (Tammuz I), the blast wave did not damage the much smaller reactor II (Tammuz II). Nor was any damage inflicted on the buildings within this walled off faciliteis that contained nuclear hot labs (facilities for the handling of radio isotopes), the fuel fabrication building south east of the main reactor building, machine shops which would have contained hardware and tooling for maintenance of the reactor facilities etc..
Mossad was pretty sure they had 26 pounds of highly enriched uranium was being stored in a special deep water tank to keep it from going "critical", prior to being installed into the fuel rods elements. We must remember, reactor II was on the verge of becoming active, so the Israelis took it out while the uranium was still in storage so that there would be no leaks to the neighoring area. Hell if the Muslims would have ever considered such are in an attack, to protect innocent Iraqi from radiation poisoning.
At any rate. That uranium was still around after the reactor was destroyed.
Just thought I would make these notes for Freepers to consider.
I get my info from the book BULLSEYE IRAQ which I have mentioned a number of times at this site. It's 1982 ISBN number is: 0-425-11259-4.
A very interesting account of the attack on that nuclear power plant.

[jveritas]

Thank you MU. I did not know that about Tamuz I and Tamuz II, that is very interesting information.

[FlashBack]

You're doing one heck of a job jveritas!! I hope that the media has been ringing your phone off the hook by now! Looking forward to seeing you on the cable news programs!!!
Keep up the good fight fellow FReeper!!!

[Marine_Uncle]

You may find the book in say a large libary in Boston area. It is facinating reading. Details upon detail of how the raid was planned and how they pulled it off. And a few chapters that are so deja voue for me as I read stuff posted at FR. So many of these details about say Niger connections for obtaining yellowcake where established way back when. Key players. Why did say Portugal provide a way to sell 90 tons of yellowcake to Saddam. Key industries in the French,German,Italian sector who built up his nuclear capabilites. It simply is a great read.

[jveritas]

I hope that the media has been ringing your phone off the hook by now!

NO :) however few on our side of the media are interested in these very important documents, of course beside FR and the conservative websites, Tony Snow has mentioned these documents many times on his radio show and interviewed me as well, same with Brian Suits on his talk show radio in Seattle and he already interviewed me twice.

[jveritas]

Thank you very much, whenever I have the time I will try to look for this book and read it.

[RaceBannon]

major bump

[FlashBack]

I've heard you on Tony's show...Great job by the way!
You'd think that those interviews you've been doing would continue to open a few more doors for more interviews!
Facinating reading at any rate...thank you again for your efforts!!!!

[Ernest_at_the_Beach]

Don't send a note .....we need those fools to keep opening their mouth as we accumulate these translations...then we LAY IT ON THEM!!!!

[Txsleuth]

CHECK!

[Cindy]

Thanks for the ping Calpernia.

---

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1617489/posts?page=416#416

[Cindy]

Thanks for the ping RaceBannon.
---

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1617489/posts?page=416#416

[Salem]

Iraq War documents Ping!

---

AMERICA AT WAR
At Salem the Soldier's Homepage ~
Honored member of FReeper Leapfrog's "Enemy of Islam" list.
Islam, a Religion of Peace®? Some links...  by backhoe
Mohammed, The Mad Poet Quoted....  by PsyOp
One FReeper On The Line  by SNOWFLAKE
The Clash of Ideologies - A Review

[jveritas]

Amen to the beautiful picture :)

[Marine_Uncle]

"Don't send a note .....we need those fools to keep opening their mouth as we accumulate these translations...then we LAY IT ON THEM!!!!"
Ernest. Good point. Better to time a real big blast that cannot be ignored. Well planed in future package delivered by the right people is the best approach. One does not want to give the L/MSM any room to play games. It has to be along the lines of a knock out punch. One cannot shadow box with them, they are to good at deceit, slick sneaky snakes, know how to avoid being stepped on. One must drill them in the head with a bullet or whack em with a shovel.

[Salem]

Will be adding your FReeper Profile Page to my small but critical list of FReeper war related links. Your efforts on the Pre-War Docs is just invaluable, and what makes Free Republic as a whole such a high impact entity.  

[popdonnelly]

"They had on an ex CIA guy...that was adamant about the "fact" that Iraq NEVER tried to get uranium from Niger...and seemed equally adamant that there was no reason to believe that Saddam had any WMDs....when Bush was contemplating going to war"

I would say that man doesn't know what he's talking about. But what do you expect from 60 Minutes? CBS should have retired this liberal geriatric ward a long time ago.

[MizSterious]

Tx--I saw that too, and was just stunned that they keep plugging away at the same old lies over and over--knowing full well what's being found. (You can't tell me that they're not aware of these papers!)

[jveritas]

Thank you very much for your support on this very important issue :)

[Txsleuth]

I tell ya....these people live in an alternate universe!

[Alamo-Girl]

Thanks for the ping!

[Just A Nobody]

Amazing! Thanks again for all your hard work!

[Ernest_at_the_Beach]

They are in charge of propaganda,....you expect them to tell us truthful facts....?

[justshutupandtakeit]

Shove it up the Treason Media's @$$ bump.

[Shelayne]

But what do you expect from 60 Minutes? CBS should have retired this liberal geriatric ward a long time ago.

The name now reflects how long it takes these old geezers to get to the set from the bathroom. ;^)

As usual, jveritas, you ROCK!

[Ernest_at_the_Beach]

See post #37...and the book:

*******************************************************

Unholy Alliance : Radical Islam and the American Left (Hardcover)

*******************************

And a review:

****************************************

Communism is dead. Long live Islam!, September 30, 2004

Reviewer:

Kevin Beckman (Sacramento, CA) - See all my reviews

It sounds absurd: why would Leftists make common cause with a religion that is diametrically opposed to everything the Left stands for? David Horowitz explains that it is really quite logical given the Left's first principle: America is evil and anything or anyone opposed to America is good.

Part I of the book is a brief history of 9/11 through the end of major combat operations in Iraq, and the Left's behavior during this time. Horowitz includes the reaction of Katha Pollitt of The Nation magazine: "The flag stands for vengeance, and jingoism, and war." Anthropology Professor Nicholas De Genova of Columbia University said he hoped for "a million Mogadishus." His colleagues objected, not to the despicable sentiment, but because of the bad publicity it brought their "teach-in." Our tax dollars at work!

Part II is the heart of the book: a history of the American and international Left. Horowitz calls them Neo-Communists or Neocoms. The Neocoms of old believed in the Soviet Union the way religious people believe in God. Those who spied for the USSR didn't see themselves as traitors to their country, but rather loyalists to humanity and an ideal of America that's never existed. When the Soviet Union fell, a few of them stopped for some introspection but most pressed on as if nothing happened. Communist historian Eric Hobsbawm put it nicely: "Without the Revolution, my life and my work are meaningless."

Now that they no longer have to defend an indefensible regime, modern Neocoms are simply nihilists. They know what they oppose but they have no plans for the aftermath of the revolution which they still believe will happen. They don't know what they want, but they know what they hate: the United States, capitalism personified.

So why are they allying with radical Islam? Horowitz says that the Neocoms still believe in Marx's dictum that "religion is the opiate of the masses." Once private property is abolished, the need for religion will vanish, and Islamic radicals will stop being Islamic and radical. The only thing standing in the way is the United States.

Sound insane? It is. They are. I highly recommend this book. Horowitz makes the insanity understandable.

[jveritas]

Thank you all very much.

[Ernest_at_the_Beach]

Outstanding work.....

[Spacetrucker]

God bless you Joe - you are truly a national treasure. One thing I wonder sometimes; you have to be really getting under the skin of some of our "N.W.O.'ers" - has any hate mail been coming your way?

[Peach]

Well, lookie here. Saddam was actively working on his WMD program; nuclear no less. Good job, jveritas.

[jveritas]

No hate e-mail yet, but you never know :)

[avacado]

I wasn't sure what a Nuclear "Simulator" Reactor was so I looked it up.

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/reg-guides/power-reactors/active/01-149/

Am I correct in understanding that what the Iraqis were building was just a mock up of an actual reactor to be used for training?

[prairiebreeze]

Lets see. First you uncovered about the "special" (chemical) weapons, now nuclear programs restarted. Evidence of Bio weapons are most certainly just around the corner. Along with terrorist training. The mosaic of evidence continues to form.

Unless you're a deaf, dumb and blind leftist who hates Bush more than you love your country and don't want to know the truth. And who doesn't have the sense that God gave a goat.

High fives, j.

[johnny7]

I think that fat, lying turd ATE the WMD's.

[ASA Vet]

MI Ping

Subject: Iraq Nuclear Program
Source: Jveritas translation

[tellw]

When these documents were first coming out, ABC News was providing translations and posting them on the website. But in recent weeks, ABC seems to have ignored them.