Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Could a Diver Breach Security at Norfolk Naval Base?
WAVY News 10 ^ | Jan. 29, 2002 | WAVY News 10

Posted on 01/30/2002 5:29:12 AM PST by LiberteeBell

Jan. 29 - How safe are we? How safe are our sailors? After the USS Cole, after September 11th, it became a common site ... increased security on land.

But WAVY News 10 has uncovered disturbing details about security on the water.

The scene at the piers on the Norfolk Naval Base show the increased security. Military boats scan the water, armed guard protecting the ships. Buoys and nets underwater are meant to stop any small boat that gets close. But could someone slip through this security? Could a terrorist target the nuclear powered George Washington air craft carrier sitting in the middle of the base?

WAVY News 10 has learned that scenario may have happened. A possible attack was prevented just days after the USS Cole anniversary. Not by the patrol boats or buoys, but by someone across the pier who just happened to see a diver in the water, right next to the hull of USS George Washington.

Boats and divers were sent into the water but whatever or whoever it was got away.

Navy officials say at least five people saw the object in the water. It looked like it was wearing a wet suit and a back pack. Could it have been a manatee? The Virginia Marine Science Museum says it's highly unlikely the warm water creature would get anywhere near Norfolk in October.

Did the Navy not want this story out? When we first heard about this a month ago, the Navy's response was "it didn't happen." Even Admiral Robert Natter, Commander of the Fleet, said he didn't know anything about it.

But shortly after the sighting, a warning was sent to the entire fleet, including the Roosevelt overseas.

How could this happen after the USS Cole and September 11th? Investigators have been to local dive shops to see if anyone suspicious rented equipment.

WAVY News 10 is continuing to follow this potential security breach, and will have additional information in upcoming newscasts.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last
There were local rumors concerning this incident right after it happened. Interesting that it is just now being reported.
1 posted on 01/30/2002 5:29:12 AM PST by LiberteeBell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: LiberteeBell
I'd give you an honest answer, except it would violate the loose lips sinks ships statute.
2 posted on 01/30/2002 5:35:57 AM PST by csvset
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LiberteeBell
How much damage could a diver do to a carrier at Norfolk? Those ships are huge and the water depth is very shallow under their berth.
3 posted on 01/30/2002 5:37:30 AM PST by Rebelbase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: csvset
Can you give the answer in a way that doesn't violate loose lips?
4 posted on 01/30/2002 5:37:50 AM PST by cactmh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: csvset
Rogue Warrior comes to mind.
5 posted on 01/30/2002 5:39:52 AM PST by Rebelbase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: LiberteeBell
Anything's possible. Vigilance always.
6 posted on 01/30/2002 5:41:31 AM PST by TADSLOS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rebelbase
I don't know how much damage could be done but I never considered the damage that could be done with suicide bombers on a raft or in airplanes. I can only say that contemplating the possibilities after I heard about the diver cost me a night or two of sleep!
7 posted on 01/30/2002 6:03:36 AM PST by LiberteeBell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: LiberteeBell
Your WAVY News 10 source link isn't working (at least for me).
8 posted on 01/30/2002 6:41:18 AM PST by LurkedLongEnough
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LurkedLongEnough
Sorry about that. Try this: WAVY News 10
9 posted on 01/30/2002 7:00:50 AM PST by LiberteeBell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Rebelbase; Travis McGee; Squantos; Wu
,I>How much damage could a diver do to a carrier at Norfolk?

Significant damage. At least enough damage that the ship would be out of action for a significant amount of time. A whole lot depends upon what munition a diver attached and where specifically the munition was attached.

Stay well - Stay safe - Stay armed - Yorktown

10 posted on 01/30/2002 7:07:23 AM PST by harpseal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: LiberteeBell
I wonder if they still have their killer dolphins.
11 posted on 01/30/2002 7:10:21 AM PST by struwwelpeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LiberteeBell; Harpseal ; Travis McGee ; AAAbest ; Sneakypete ; Texasproud ; Jeff Head
There are three folks that I know at FR that know exactly what, how and when and have done so in both training and real world. But the point that I'm sure you and all will understand in these times we live in the information is not something to share with the media, or those who really only want to know for any other reason than knowing what it would take.

We have to understand that some would or could use the information to do damage or harm so lets not help any one with less than honorable intentions make life tough for the crews and security forces protecting them by providing even one more lesson in sabotage 101.......

And to all those who say BS the info is already available on the WW Web then link to it or shut their pie hole........

Stay Safe ....

12 posted on 01/30/2002 7:30:44 AM PST by Squantos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Squantos
Anti-terror and HRT teams regulary breach secure bases.

In most cases there's a head up to top brass though so nobody gets hurt in the process.

When I was stationed in Germany we were constantly getting probed by friendly SpecOp d00ds during alerts. They'd walk around our motor pool putting stickers on vehicles and grabbing equipment that they'd later hand over to the very unhappy full-bird.

He'd in turn have us join him in his unhappyness by calling 4 wee-hour alerts in the next week until we got it right.

It kinda sucked but it was good training.

13 posted on 01/30/2002 8:36:37 AM PST by AAABEST
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Rebelbase
Rogue Warrior comes to mind.

If that poser Marchinko tells you it's daytime,turn on your lights.

14 posted on 01/30/2002 9:15:11 AM PST by sneakypete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Squantos
And to all those who say BS the info is already available on the WW Web then link to it or shut their pie hole........

I agree,but I wouldn't even want to see anybody make any links. Who knows how many mentally-unbalenced losers there are out there that would like to get "famous" by becoming a copycat? I say that if they are going to do it,make them do ALL the work.

15 posted on 01/30/2002 9:18:46 AM PST by sneakypete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: AAABEST ; Travis Mcgee ; Harpseal
I agree on the red cell/ special operators test's of the past approach but that was yesterday ....try this crap this AM and I'd pop a cap in their butt if I observed em and IMHO with current state of affairs the repercussions would not be as they were or would have been in the past.

When (authorized) divers are in the water working all know it to include those standing watch. Not sure of the current threat con but I'd rather stand captains mast for shooting a carp or even a PADI/NAUI sport diver than letting someone blow a hole in the hull with a soviet SPM limpet mine.

Too many multi-lingual postings and surface patrols and troops standing watch for someone to accidentally swim a few miles or so to peek at a big ole boat.

16 posted on 01/30/2002 9:18:49 AM PST by Squantos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: sneakypete ; AAABEST
AAA ....Doh !!...forgot to say Stay Safe above , getting old :o)

SP ......agree 100%,.... but I've had others tell me I was living in a bubble if I believed such instruction wasn't available on the web so I just tried to respond to that point of order before it floated to the surface.......Agree 100% on making em find their own data.

STAY SAFE !!

17 posted on 01/30/2002 9:23:04 AM PST by Squantos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: sneakypete
Was I hooked and gaffed by believing that stuff was true?
18 posted on 01/30/2002 9:25:20 AM PST by Rebelbase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: harpseal
Yep. The ships are vulnerable whenever they are in port, anywhere in the world. Teams of divers could, without much expense, disable ships, and if done simulataneously at different ports with several vessels could really screw the pooch since we have limited drydock facilities to effect repairs.

There's a guy who's been warning of this sort of thing for years- since he could surely do it with some crews and enough money to get them where they need to be. I think he said he could sew up he fleet for at least 18 weeks with only the most rudimentary of explosives, and seemed more concerned about dolphins than other more conventional countermeasures, many of which weren't even being used because training is down so bad and people have gotten lazy over the past years. But no one paid much attention... everyone with the rank needed to get anything done was more concerned with maintaining the status quo until they could retire than risk getting involved in any serious effort to fix the weakness. And no, we don't have enough dolphins.

19 posted on 01/30/2002 9:30:55 AM PST by piasa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Rebelbase
Was I hooked and gaffed by believing that stuff was true?

Yes and no. Some is obviously true. He WAS a SEAL,and SEALS do this sort of thing for a living.What you have to keep in mind is that Marchinko is a known liar and self-promoter who is a legend in his own mind.

20 posted on 01/30/2002 9:35:41 AM PST by sneakypete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson