Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jolly Rodgers
She was not "pro-abortion," she was "pro-choice." Who in their right mind would WANT to have an abortion, if they could avoid it? To my knowledge, she never had an abortion. (If she had, I'm sure one of her critics would have brought it out by now.) During her child-bearing years, abortions were illegal and quite dangerous. I imagine she did what other intelligent women did -- use birth control.
296 posted on 03/12/2002 9:53:01 PM PST by lynn madison
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 262 | View Replies ]


To: lynn madison
She was not "pro-abortion," she was "pro-choice."

Semantics and euphamism intended to hide the fact that abortion is murder. If you've read her non-fiction works, then it would be quite clear that she was very pro-abortion.

Who in their right mind would WANT to have an abortion, if they could avoid it?

Apparently there are quite a large number of women who WANT to have abortions. After all, nobody is dragging them into the clinics to have their children ripped out of the womb.

To my knowledge, she never had an abortion.

As I said, it is mere speculation on my part.

(If she had, I'm sure one of her critics would have brought it out by now.) During her child-bearing years, abortions were illegal and quite dangerous. I imagine she did what other intelligent women did -- use birth control.

Using birth control is certainly preferable to child murder.

300 posted on 03/13/2002 9:02:08 PM PST by Jolly Rodgers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 296 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson