Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FresnoDA
Unless the DA has some very compelling evidence, an eyewitness, or a confession by Westerfield they havn't yet introduced in the public proceeding, I don't see how any jury will find Westerfield guilty of anything, much less murder. They haven't even shown -- beyond reasonable doubt -- that Danielle was murdered, much less by whom.
4 posted on 03/18/2002 7:22:03 AM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: bvw
Agreement Bump....but hang him if he is proven guilty, of course....FDA
5 posted on 03/18/2002 7:26:36 AM PST by FresnoDA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: bvw
Sheesh, they spent the entire PH talking about the parents, right? Say, who is the defendant? LOL That was bad, I know..
7 posted on 03/18/2002 7:50:37 AM PST by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: bvw
She said she told Westerfield that she and her friends might return to Dad's the next Friday if she could get a baby sitter. Her husband, she recalled telling him, would be out of town.

This is not an invitation to kidnap and murder a child. It is an invitation to meet an adult woman at a bar, when her husband is out of town, and perhaps hook up later. There is no evidence that Westerfield was interested an anything other than adult women. Even the police admit the porn photos were exclusively "post pubescent" (my term) women. DW was interested in meeting Brenda's adult friends. He wanted to meet Brenda and her husband, and invite them to "adult" parties.

Can anyone tell me when DW had access to kidnap Danielle? He was in the bar until at least 10:30. He would have had to assume a babysitter was in the house after that. Babysitters stay in the living or family room of the house. They don't go upstairs and go to bed. How would you enter a house with the babysitter downstairs?

At 2:30, Brenda and friends were in the house. They did not leave until 2:30. At 3:30 Damon was up and noticed the door open. He shut it and it was still shut the following morning. So, the window of opportunity to kidnap Danielle was 2:30 to 3:30 a.m. Why would DW feel safe to enter the house then?

Isn't is more likely that the "kidnapper" was someone already in the house? Either the parents or one of the friends? We don't even know that Danielle was kidnapped. She could have had an accident in the house, or wandered out when the party was going on.

12 posted on 03/18/2002 8:39:17 AM PST by BigBobber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson