Sheesh, they spent the entire PH talking about the parents, right? Say, who is the defendant? LOL That was bad, I know..
The child porn angle has no legs that I can see. Out of the thousands of pics the guy gleefully allowed the authorities to view, there were but a few that resembled chid porn and only because they were designed to be so.(ie: probably phoney) That is why the charge is a secondary or even a non-event type of charge.(easilly defended)
I see nothing that convinces me that they even have the right guy. (except for the DNA) Even the DNA is as yet nailed down. I will wait till trial before I make any conclusions.