Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Invading Iraq sure wasn't about oil
National Post ^ | March 19 2002 | George Jonas, National Post

Posted on 03/19/2002 2:55:59 PM PST by knighthawk

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

1 posted on 03/19/2002 2:55:59 PM PST by knighthawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: golitely; rebdov; Nix 2; viadexter; green lantern; BeOSUser; itsahoot; Brad's Gramma; Barset
Ping
2 posted on 03/19/2002 2:56:52 PM PST by knighthawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk; aculeus; Orual
Hmmm, an interesting and unusual point of view. Good post.
3 posted on 03/19/2002 3:11:36 PM PST by dighton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: *Energy_list;*Geopolitics;Black Jade
Check the Bump List folders for articles related to and descriptions of the above topic(s) or for other topics of interest.
4 posted on 03/19/2002 3:16:46 PM PST by Free the USA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
Dang, that's a pretty good article. I see it makes sense and would be to the US' best interest to ally itself with Iraq against the islamist regimes in the region. Let Saddam have the entire Gulf region - in exchange for steady oil and peace with Israel.

Dang! Why didn't I think of it before?

5 posted on 03/19/2002 3:35:46 PM PST by Edward Watson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Edward Watson
Well, classic balance-of-power politics says that it's dangerous to do business with the strongest nations and to help build them up further. Rather, you undermine the strong nations and build up the weaker ones. Kissinger and Machiavelli would agree on that, and so would the ancient Romans.

As it is, Saddam is hard enough to deal with. If he controlled all the oil in the Middle East he would, to say the least, be insufferable.

6 posted on 03/19/2002 3:47:18 PM PST by Cicero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
Interesting perspective........
7 posted on 03/19/2002 4:01:37 PM PST by Mat_Helm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dighton
Hmmm, an interesting and unusual point of view. Good post.

Hmmm is right. Personally I think Saddam is too unstable to be trusted. Not to mention his psychotic son.

Or is the author just making the point that the 'it's all about oil' argument is all wet?

8 posted on 03/19/2002 4:48:42 PM PST by aculeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: aculeus; Orual
IMHO, his main point is: If Americans were really as the Guardianistas and Raimondistas libel us -- ruthless imperialists, etc. -- we'd back Saddam.
9 posted on 03/19/2002 5:01:36 PM PST by dighton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
I detect a little touch of Jonathan Swift in this.
10 posted on 03/19/2002 5:17:38 PM PST by chaosagent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
I detect a little touch of Jonathan Swift in this.
11 posted on 03/19/2002 5:17:57 PM PST by chaosagent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
I give up. If it weren't for the oil, why did Bush Sr. attack Iraq?
12 posted on 03/19/2002 8:32:40 PM PST by DentsRun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #13 Removed by Moderator

To: Black Jade
Appreciate the ping.
14 posted on 03/30/2002 6:51:38 PM PST by mafree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Turk2
ping!
15 posted on 03/30/2002 6:54:10 PM PST by pkpjamestown
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
Interesting
16 posted on 03/30/2002 6:56:15 PM PST by A. Pole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Turk2
http://idex.janes.com/landforces_data/aapcdetails.shtml
17 posted on 03/30/2002 7:06:09 PM PST by pkpjamestown
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
We should be entirely guided by( enlightened of course) self interest if we were we would have made a deal with Hussein we get cheap oil and he wipes out the Wahabbi sect in return he gets to keep the Arabian peninsula. Saddam ain't the enemy its the Saudis.
18 posted on 03/30/2002 7:55:59 PM PST by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
In fact if it is still possible to make that same deal now we shouldn't hesitate to make it.
19 posted on 03/30/2002 7:58:39 PM PST by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
He'd still be too weak to fight us if he doublecrossed us( and I maintain that he would be less likely to then the Saudis realpolitik guys are more predictable then religious fanatics like the Sauds) we could destroy him easily.
20 posted on 03/30/2002 8:00:48 PM PST by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson