[editor-surveyor]

E.P.A. ??

Environmental Phraud Activists

[Libertarianize the GOP]

bttt

[farmfriend]

Thanks for the flag.

[E.G.C.]

BTTT!!!!

[Madame Dufarge]

Thanks for the flag.

For the life of me, I can't figure out why Bush gave Whitman this job. It's like putting the fox in charge of the henhouse.

No serious effort to bitch slap this leviathan of an agency can ever take place with a socialist like her at the helm.

[Prodigal Son]

Thanks for the ping.

[mafree]

E.P.A. ??

Environmental Phraud Activists

Funny! Thanks for the flag.

[COB1]

Thanks for the ping, e-s.
This becomes even more ridiculous when you read about how the standards were developed in the first place.
Skewed data?
HA!
What's new?

[Victoria Delsoul]

In accordance with its own procedures and in compliance with the Clean Air Act, EPA should ask its Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee to review the scientific evidence of the benefits of ground level ozone. More generally, EPA should assess these benefits in the same detailed and systematic way it assesses the respiratory health benefits of more stringent standards.

Bump.

[sistergoldenhair]

In accordance with its own procedures and in compliance with the Clean Air Act, EPA should ask its Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee to review the scientific evidence of the benefits of ground level ozone.

How about an independent review of all the data?
Never mind...it might result in the wrong conclusion.

[Ernest_at_the_Beach]

Thanks for the ping!

Sounds like she needs to clean out some rats!

[FReethesheeples]

Mega-bump!!!