Posted on 03/25/2002 1:46:46 AM PST by JohnHuang2
Edited on 07/12/2004 3:52:14 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]
The Environmental Protection Agency is not keeping Administrator Christie Whitman's commitment to issue regulations based on the best possible science. It is reissuing Administrator Carol Browner's monumental 1997 national air quality standards for ozone based on scientific judgments that are incompatible with its own technical analyses and in violation of procedures to safeguard scientific judgment.
(Excerpt) Read more at washtimes.com ...
Environmental Phraud Activists
For the life of me, I can't figure out why Bush gave Whitman this job. It's like putting the fox in charge of the henhouse.
No serious effort to bitch slap this leviathan of an agency can ever take place with a socialist like her at the helm.
Environmental Phraud Activists
Funny! Thanks for the flag.
In accordance with its own procedures and in compliance with the Clean Air Act, EPA should ask its Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee to review the scientific evidence of the benefits of ground level ozone. More generally, EPA should assess these benefits in the same detailed and systematic way it assesses the respiratory health benefits of more stringent standards.
Bump.
How about an independent review of all the data?
Never mind...it might result in the wrong conclusion.
Not necessary. They already ran it by the crowd at the Green Party rally.
Sounds like she needs to clean out some rats!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.