Clean air and polluted science

Washington Times ^ | Monday, March 25, 2002 | Randall Lutter

[JohnHuang2]

The Environmental Protection Agency is not keeping Administrator Christie Whitman's commitment to issue regulations based on the best possible science. It is reissuing Administrator Carol Browner's monumental 1997 national air quality standards for ozone based on scientific judgments that are incompatible with its own technical analyses and in violation of procedures to safeguard scientific judgment.

[JohnHuang2]

Monday, March 25, 2002

Quote of the Day by Alissa 3/25/02

[meenie]

The more things change, the more they stay the same. This proves that Christi Todd Whitman is a socialist at heart whether she maintains Pubbie or Dem credentials.

[Free the USA]

Check the Bump List folders for articles related to and descriptions of the above topic(s) or for other topics of interest.

[editor-surveyor]

E.P.A. ??

Environmental Phraud Activists

[Libertarianize the GOP]

bttt

[farmfriend]

Thanks for the flag.

[E.G.C.]

BTTT!!!!

[Madame Dufarge]

Thanks for the flag.

For the life of me, I can't figure out why Bush gave Whitman this job. It's like putting the fox in charge of the henhouse.

No serious effort to bitch slap this leviathan of an agency can ever take place with a socialist like her at the helm.

[Prodigal Son]

Thanks for the ping.

[mafree]

E.P.A. ??

Environmental Phraud Activists

Funny! Thanks for the flag.

[COB1]

Thanks for the ping, e-s.
This becomes even more ridiculous when you read about how the standards were developed in the first place.
Skewed data?
HA!
What's new?

[Victoria Delsoul]

In accordance with its own procedures and in compliance with the Clean Air Act, EPA should ask its Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee to review the scientific evidence of the benefits of ground level ozone. More generally, EPA should assess these benefits in the same detailed and systematic way it assesses the respiratory health benefits of more stringent standards.

Bump.

[sistergoldenhair]

In accordance with its own procedures and in compliance with the Clean Air Act, EPA should ask its Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee to review the scientific evidence of the benefits of ground level ozone.

How about an independent review of all the data?
Never mind...it might result in the wrong conclusion.

[kitchen]

How about an independent review of all the data?

Not necessary. They already ran it by the crowd at the Green Party rally.

[Ernest_at_the_Beach]

Thanks for the ping!

Sounds like she needs to clean out some rats!

[FReethesheeples]

Mega-bump!!!