1 posted on
03/31/2002 3:17:14 PM PST by
Pokey78
To: Pokey78
Yet many, according to M Goudineau, had done deals with Caesar and put up little or no fight. LOL!!! Would that be those in and around Vichy? Wonder if Caesar's Conquests talks about the natural inclination of the French to give up.
2 posted on
03/31/2002 3:21:51 PM PST by
LBGA
To: Pokey78
"It was Julius Caesar who gave the name of Gaul to the territories he had conquered, drawing an arbitrary boundary between France and Germany. In their quest for glory, the Romans depicted their enemies as warlike, courageous and uncontrollable, an image that retains its force in France today.
Yet many, according to M Goudineau, had done deals with Caesar and put up little or no fight."In a related development, the eminent scholar BigCheese also noted: "D*mn! The more things change, the more things stay the same"
3 posted on
03/31/2002 3:22:36 PM PST by
bigcheese
To: Pokey78
Gaul-Lump
4 posted on
03/31/2002 3:23:38 PM PST by
Spirited
To: Pokey78
Yet many, according to M Goudineau, had done deals with Caesar and put up little or no fight. Yep, that sure sounds like the French that we've come to know and love!
To: Pokey78
. M Goudineau claims that the bird is not the Gallic emblem that France believes it to be. In fact, it was an insult Sacre bleu, mon ami, you are nothing but a soiled rooster!
To: Pokey78
To: Pokey78
What the hell..........I'll cut 'em some slack. They may have engaged in backsliding since, but right after 9/11 the French united in backing our country. I may have my gripes with them, but I'll
never forget that show of support and solidarity.
God bless 'em.
To: Pokey78
Next, Christian Goudineau will be demanding reparations for the embarrassment being called Gallic has wrought...so he will be suing Italy...or Rome, Georgia, USA.
12 posted on
03/31/2002 3:51:46 PM PST by
TomGuy
To: Pokey78;all
14 posted on
03/31/2002 3:56:08 PM PST by
mdittmar
To: Pokey78
THE French identity is based on an historical nonsense, according to an academic who says that the Gauls were a fiction invented by the Romans and exploited by French revolutionaries after 1789. Strange, this man clearly never saw the Asterix!
16 posted on
03/31/2002 3:57:29 PM PST by
A. Pole
To: Pokey78
...but remained popular because his roots were seen to be deep in the Gallic myth: a healthy appetite for food, alcohol and women. Whatever the history, it's a mistake to say these characteristics are myth. If they weren't true 2000 years ago, there sure are now, and they are the principle redeeming characteristics of the French.
17 posted on
03/31/2002 3:58:29 PM PST by
mlo
To: Pokey78
Good and interesting post. Thank you. Only the French would feel good about in being enslaved and murdered by the Romans.
To: Pokey78
To me, "By Toutatis!" is only what Asterix and Obelix yell when it's clobberin' time.
To: Pokey78
RE:warlike, courageous and uncontrollable,
...who had as many words for "surrender" as eskimos have for "snow"
24 posted on
03/31/2002 5:15:57 PM PST by
tomakaze
To: Pokey78
There was no such thing as "France" until the Franks came to dominate Western Europe. Ancient Gaul wasn't French yet.
25 posted on
03/31/2002 5:17:58 PM PST by
ValenB4
To: Pokey78
Goudineau is quite right in his book debunking the Gallic myth. Interesting to see his claim that most Gauls capitulated without much of a fight as in that excellent comic book series, Asterix's village was the only one which apparently put up a fight while the rest of the villages had caved in to the Romans. Until the Romans came and brought civilization followed by Christianity, France and the British Isles mostly resembled uncivilized mosaics of people just as Africa is now. It took a few hundred years of interbreeding of the aboriginals (original purebred sons and daughters of the soil) with invaders to break the mold and Christianity to give them a soul and aspiration to civilization.
To: Pokey78
I'm not quite sure what to make of this. They contrasted dramatically in customs with the Germans who lived just across the Rhine.
As for their caving in, just like their descendants in WWII:
1. The French fought a great many wars (probably hundreds) over the last thousand years or so. Of those wars, they were ignominiously defeated in exactly one. They didn't always win, but they always fought bravely. Not a bad record, overall.
2. Caesar, perhaps the greatest military mind leading the most perfectly adapted military machine in history, took eight years (I think) to conquer the Gauls. Of the six million Gauls, at the end of the war perhaps 2,000,000 were dead and another million had been sold into slavery.
So much for ignominious surrender. They were defeated by superior technology and (especially) discipline. Nobody, especially the Romans, ever claimed they weren't brave.
31 posted on
03/31/2002 5:58:55 PM PST by
Restorer
42 posted on
05/23/2008 11:31:26 PM PDT by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/_______________________Profile updated Monday, April 28, 2008)
43 posted on
05/23/2008 11:34:30 PM PDT by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/_______________________Profile updated Monday, April 28, 2008)
To: Pokey78
I’m sorry, this “scholar” must be on something because anything immortalized by Asterix and Obelix is TRUE!
Actually, they didn’t get too far toward the unification of Gaul, did they?
44 posted on
05/23/2008 11:49:30 PM PDT by
Enchante
(Barack Chamberlain: My 1930s Appeasement Policy Goes Well With My 1960s Socialist Policies!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson