Skip to comments.
Government Study: Alaska Drilling Harmful
Reuters
| Mar 29 4:27pm ET
| Julie Vorman
Posted on 04/02/2002 2:13:53 PM PST by Praetorian
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 next last
Just putting this out for comments.
To: Praetorian
Opening Alaska's Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to oil drilling could harm caribou, snow geese and other wildlife, a new U.S. government study said on Friday, For the love of Pete, who really gives a damn?
To: Praetorian
I'll fell morally superior for providing these animals a better quality of life while Saddam Hussein sales oil to us to provide money for military arms and nuclear technology.
/sarcasm (not aimed at you)
To: Praetorian
If we continue to be held hostage to imported oil, we run the risk of a repeat of 1974. One hundred million people waiting over an hour to get gas, or, odd license plates on odd dates, or, maybe no gas at all--we'll see if anybody really gives a flying fornication about caribou or snow geese.
To: Praetorian
Environmental groups oppose the plan, saying drilling would destroy a scenic place sometimes called "America's Serengeti" and would also fail to yield any sizable amount of oil for several years.I find it odd how not getting an appreciable amount of oil for several years is a valid argument. It would take a few years just to get the operation online once they started. In any case it is a long term project. What do they expect, that the oil will flow immediately and abundantly. This study doesn't seem to provide much in the way of concrete evidence
To: Praetorian
"America's Serengeti"
Hey, this is Alaska, you idiots. The entire Serengeti plain isn't a broom closet in the AWNR. Besides, no self-respecting giraffe would be caught dead in the Arctic.
To: Praetorian
BP has decided not to drill exploratory wells this year in NPR-A, which is to the other side of Prudhoe from ANWR in a very similar environment. BP has declined to drill this year because of market conditions rather than concern over the pristine environment.
To: Praetorian
The department is still filled with a bunch of clinton appointees and enviromentalist wackos. You know the kind: The same ones who would put phony lynx hairs on rubbing posts.
8
posted on
04/02/2002 2:27:54 PM PST
by
lowbridge
To: Praetorian
The estimated 300 oxen living year-round in the plain may be weakened if they are forced to move away from a drilling area, the report said. I wish we had someone to read through this propaganda. I don't doubt unacceptable damage can done, but what does this report show? The oxen moved from point A to Point B, they expended calories doing so, and they are "weakened." This smells like one of those fake lynx hair stories.
Anyway, it's about the Natural Gas, not so much the oil, which the environmentalists are completely clueless about, as are many others.
9
posted on
04/02/2002 2:28:02 PM PST
by
Shermy
To: Praetorian
Opening Alaska's Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to oil drilling could harm caribou, snow geese and other wildlife, a new U.S. government study said on Friday, despite the Bush administration's assurances that oil exploration would have little impact. What government NUT did that study?!
10
posted on
04/02/2002 2:28:19 PM PST
by
kcvl
To: Praetorian
No matter that the report is based on drilling activities that are no longer proposed. Why focus on a silly detail like that? It is scary that most senators oppose developing oil from the edge of the world which is needed by an enormous superpower with hundreds of millions of people. As I have mentioned many times, the caribou did not go to ANWR this year. They stayed hundreds of miles away in Canada. The article also makes it sound like drilling would cover this South Carolina sized park, whereas it is proposed for the extreme Northern and inhospitable 1%.
Oh, and it will take a few years to get the oil. So don't get started. And do you think that Bush is motivated by the fact he is a "former oilman," as opposed to his concerns about the United States?
11
posted on
04/02/2002 2:30:31 PM PST
by
Williams
To: Praetorian
The idea of drilling in ANWR is an outrage ...... clearly it is detrimental to the wildlife, who are fearful of these man-made structures.
And how could we consider destroying such magnificent scenery. Obviously whole square feet would be disturbed.
12
posted on
04/02/2002 2:31:14 PM PST
by
kayak
To: Praetorian
Another instance of what happens because Bush didn't broom the clintonoids out of his government. If the Interior Department doesn't believe in this report, then why the devil did they allow it to be released? Or written in the first place? Clinton would NEVER have allowed anyone working for him to embarrass him like this--and he had a lot more to be embarrassed about.
13
posted on
04/02/2002 2:31:15 PM PST
by
Cicero
To: Praetorian
I find it odd how not getting an appreciable amount of oil for several years is a valid argument. It would take a few years just to get the operation online once they started. In any case it is a long term project. What do they expect, that the oil will flow immediately and abundantly.I'm with you, if it's gonna take ten years...then get humpin and pumpin.
Interesting story...We bought a large office building and one of the tenants' was a lawyer's office that had never paid rent since moving in six months earlier. When I confronted Mr. Schwartz, the lawyer, I told him that I did not care about the prior six month's rent...only start paying now! He informed me that it would take me approximately one year to evict him...guess what? It did take a year. Glad we sued immediately.
BTW, Mr. Schwartz was very surprised when the sherriff's office showed up one day and started moving all the furniture/equipment to the street...it was SWEET (I took pictures)
14
posted on
04/02/2002 2:33:14 PM PST
by
demsux
To: kayak
Your pictures are worth a million barrels of oil.
15
posted on
04/02/2002 2:35:30 PM PST
by
Williams
To: Praetorian
To: kayak
Those pics bring it all into perspective.
To: Praetorian
Opening Alaska's Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to oil drilling could harm caribou, snow geese and other wildlife...
Could? Could? But not will? Then who cares? DO IT!
To: kayak
Indeed, we heard this all before the Alaska Pipline was built in the 70s. Since then the caribou herds have quadrupled in size.
19
posted on
04/02/2002 2:40:33 PM PST
by
Hugin
To: Williams
There are more ...... click on the arrows on this site .....
ANWR photo gallery
ANWR in summer .....
ANWR in spring ....
If only someone in the media would be honest enough to show these pictures, progress might be made on this issue!
20
posted on
04/02/2002 2:41:17 PM PST
by
kayak
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson