Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Poohbah
OK, it’s time for my to weigh in even though I've never served and my opinion’s not worth much!

As much as I’d love to see the battleships return (I toured the New Jersey during it’s refitting in the 60’s and tried to do the same in Long Beach but bugged out when I found out I was about 200,000th in line), I’m afraid Poohbah’s view rules the day. The fact that the ships are so old that no one can operate them, as a previous post pointed out, and the difficulty in getting through the armor plate to make changes really rules the whole thing out. Furthermore from a morale standpoint I’m not sure we’d really like the only opportunity to view the Missouri to be from the porthole of a submersible on a National Geographic special.

On the other hand, although we don’t have the infrastructure to make all the thick armor plate, as Poohbah has pointed out many times, I wonder if some updated version of the battleship might not be an option. Something with a very hardened hull, and simple, cheap guns (railguns?) that would not require as many sophisticated systems but deliver more firepower to the target.

41 posted on 04/03/2002 11:01:01 AM PST by SoCal Pubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]


To: SoCal Pubbie
Your idea is basically about the same as mine: figure out how to do the fire support mission, and use the latest technology throughout to design a modern, survivable, capable system. It will not be another Iowa-class battleship, but it will do the job.
42 posted on 04/03/2002 11:08:03 AM PST by Poohbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson