Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SoCal Pubbie
Your idea is basically about the same as mine: figure out how to do the fire support mission, and use the latest technology throughout to design a modern, survivable, capable system. It will not be another Iowa-class battleship, but it will do the job.
42 posted on 04/03/2002 11:08:03 AM PST by Poohbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]


To: Poohbah
Why not develop a new type of 16" gun that won't use bagged powder, and put it on a hull of Chobham armor?

It's almost a direct upgrade - all we really are doing is scaling up what we did with the 8" guns on the Salem-class cruisers.

43 posted on 04/03/2002 11:15:41 AM PST by hchutch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

To: Poohbah
There have been many discussions like this before, I have re all your posts. I seem to recall various incarnations of different designs, maybe they went no further than the paper stage. One had a towed a barge that functioned as a firing platform?

I don’t know how complicated a railgun would actually be, but the simplicity of chemical firearms must have advantages. I wonder if it would be possible to devise some type of an AB component mixture that would be basically inert until it’s loaded into the breech to negate the volatility of the magazine storage.

Another thing that comes to mind is if ships could be armored with something like the Chobram (sp?) used on the Abrams tank. Something that would increase the survivability of the hull without adding the weight of hardened steel.

45 posted on 04/03/2002 11:25:32 AM PST by SoCal Pubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson