sw
TO SOME OTHER POSTERS ON THIS THREAD.
I notice you all like to attack Kim. I don't understand why. As I go back and read replies, I notice you take the story they 'may' have purchased a BMW and go on and on about how you are so sure they spent the insurance money to get it. Then you yell at Kim for being a "VD" protectionist.
I would say you make it obvious you are a "VD" attacker. You have made up your mind, and no facts will ever change it.
Notice: Kim stated the following:
There is no proof that good hearted people bought them a car, I would suspect they could afford their own, and it's possible they had a life insurance policy. People who live in $300,000+ houses can generally afford nice cars..
Prove that anything Kim said there is incorrect! Prove anything she said proves she is defending the VD's!
Let's spend time and bandwidth discussing the FACTS of this case, instead of ranting and raving about each other. PLEASE !!!
Deal with situation,issues, behavior, and not the person. THERE IS A DIFFERENCE between saying "That idea is stupid" and "You are stupid".