Posted on 04/04/2002 12:17:14 PM PST by rdavis84
Great post, I'll have to try to read all of it later.
Imagine what would BE revealed if they'd DO an autopsy on Brown! Ashcroft has a duty to clear this up. If he doesn't then he has a reason that he needs to explain to us. If he won't, then it is probably an indication that HE is no different than Gormley ... bought and paid for. And the "owner" has to be Bush, wouldn't you say? So that means Bush must either be hiding something equally bad that the democRATS know about (a sort of mutual assured destruction threat between the parties) or Bush is also bought and paid for. Perhaps that is why the move-on'ers seem to fear the Brown case so much? They can't argue it so they try to ignore it hoping it will go away. But it is not going away. Move-on'ers are always telling us that WE should do something. So why don't we ask the members what they think at the next local Republican chapter meeting? Let's make this a campaign issue within the GOP! Accept NO EXCUSES.
What is the source of this claim?
Where did you pull that one from?
Now can someone get all that money back it cost me to get rid of my last wife?
One angle involves an Algerian, Mohammed Samir Ferrat, a Ron Brown associate who posed for a picture with RB days before RB died, only to himself die on TWA 800. Click Here
And if that .357 was loaded with .38 Specials?
Another possibility is that the events were reversed. First they cut off communicatin and crash the plane by spoofing it into the ground into pre-determined location. Then a clean up crew moves in before rescue parties can arrive and delivered a coup-de-grace to make sure. Remember, Dr. Wecht said that other than the hole in Brown's head, his injuries appeared survivable.
Why not just plant a bomb on the plane? Then you could blame the Serbs or something.
Because then there would definitely be a criminal investigation involving the FBI, which you might not be able to control. And look how good the FBI is at finding the source of bombs when it is admitted to be a bomb. Furthermore, a criminal investigation involves motive and looking at other peculiarities in what happened (like certain individuals missing the plane). Some of those individuals might not stand up to close scrutiny.
I'm sorry, I enjoy a good conspiracy theory as much as the next guy, but this one is just too far fetched.
Again, you have the cart before the horse. Why are you so afraid of a simple exhumation and autopsy? If it turns up nothing then no harm. The democRATS should like that because it would finally put this one to rest ... and this is the one they fear most. Rather than dismiss it because you think it is too far fetched, why don't you actually address the facts that we know. We know that all of the forensic pathologists who have looked at the case and made public statements in any forum say that the wound in his head was very suspicioius and he should have been autopsied. We know that the AFIP management lied about the nature of the wound and the opinions of their staff experts. We know that the official reports states that it was blunt force trauma and even the pathologist who concluded that has now admitted that the reason he gave for reaching that conclusion are not true. In other words, he was caught lying and has had to retract those lies. We know that the Whitehouse, against existing law, ordered that there be no autopsy. We know that the Air Force skipped what is normally the first phase of a crash investigation ... the phase that specifically is tasked with finding the cause. We know they lost transponder and radio contact with the plane at the same time when the plane was still 8 miles from the crash, yet this has not been explained. We know that a beacon went missing just before the crash ... the type of beacon needed to spoof the plane into flying the wrong course. We know that person in charge of that beacon and those at the airport died under suspicious circumstance a short time after the crash before he could be interviewed. We know that there is sworn testimony indicating that Brown threatened Clinton and the DNC shortly before a flight that originally, according to the same testimony, he was not supposed to be on. We know that a number of key figures in other clinton scandals just happened to miss the flight. And I could list many other suspicious facts. In other words, deal with the facts.
It would be interesting to see, by way of comparison, what sorts of injuries people killed in non-suspicious plane crashes suffer.
I would presume the pathologists mentioned above know this ... don't you think?
If you recall, that was part of the Initiation jr. had into the S&B "Society. I also believe that most of those who continue to be advanced in the political system we now endure are "Compromised", as the book described.
But it's a Good Life they get in return. As long as that lasts.
Don't forget, there was a minimum of one other survivor of the crash. It was one female flight attendent. It was reported that she walked to a special ops/rescue chopper. She bled to death of a femoral gash on the ride out. First off, a tourniquet should have been able to save her, or direct pressure on the gash in her leg. Even basic training teaches that in the Army.
Next, there were Spec Ops soldiers landed at the crash site. I've known some years back, and they ARE trained killers. Not like us regular soldiers were. They aren't known to question WHY a total elimination would be ordered. The right ones will just do it.
Also, the photos of the crashed plane show to many that some survivors probably were in the wreckage. Not many believe that any assassin was riding in the aircraft. It really would not have been intended nor needed to be anything more than a crash. But it didn't crash Hard Enough. :-)
The crash itself was the subject of much controversy. Originally claimed to have happened in the Adriatic itself, subsequent news stories slowly but surely moved the wreckage from sea to hilltop.
The government and these move-on'ers can't explain how Ira Sockowitz (John Huang's associate at Commerce), who just happened to miss the ill fated flight for unexplained reasons, managed to get to the crash site in time to be the person who reported back to Warren Christopher that there were two survivors. They also can't tell us who that second survivor was since the government has never acknowledged a second survivor. In fact, we wouldn't even know about this if Klayman hadn't uncovered a confidential timeline in Christopher's office that contains a reference to that survivor.
Even basic training teaches that in the Army.
Although it really isn't clear what the stewardess' condition was post crash (Cogswell said it depended on who you talked to), the stewardess was said to be under a doctor's care on the trip down the mountain.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.