Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/08/2002 11:29:29 AM PDT by Notwithstanding
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last
To: Notwithstanding
I think this is sick!


2 posted on 04/08/2002 11:32:38 AM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Notwithstanding
Absolutely sickening.
3 posted on 04/08/2002 11:33:10 AM PDT by zoso82t
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Notwithstanding
I think they should pay for all the special schooling and grants and rehabs their child will need instead of the taxpayers. Those services are for people, who through no fault of their own, need a helping hand, not for someone who was delibrately created so with the knowledge that everybody else will have to pay for their problem.
4 posted on 04/08/2002 11:34:03 AM PDT by I still care
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Notwithstanding
There isn't a place in Hell hot enough... Joseph Mengele would be proud.
5 posted on 04/08/2002 11:34:14 AM PDT by WALLACE212
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Notwithstanding
These bull-dykes should be shot. What the hell are they thinking?

Designer children, the end of life as we know it.

EBUCK

6 posted on 04/08/2002 11:34:57 AM PDT by EBUCK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Notwithstanding
God Damned, evil, sick, twisted, immoral, degenerate......I don't have the words to express my disgust!
7 posted on 04/08/2002 11:35:15 AM PDT by Hitlerys uterus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Notwithstanding

What is new. Dr.Mengele would be proud of this duo.

Why is it that homosexuals can get away with experiments on humans, is beyond my comprehension. America is looking more and more like the nation of cults screaming for evil recognition, identity and entitlements, as in Roman of old.

8 posted on 04/08/2002 11:35:44 AM PDT by lavaroise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Notwithstanding
They’re trying to make a baby deaf? And, they’re trying to make a baby “gay” too. Child abuse times two!
9 posted on 04/08/2002 11:36:09 AM PDT by Clint N. Suhks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: patent; father_elijah; dr. brian kopp; lady doc; ladydoc
Please ping far and wide. Everyone shouldhave this factoid in their arsenal when unfairly accused of pointing to a slippery slope.
10 posted on 04/08/2002 11:37:47 AM PDT by Notwithstanding
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Notwithstanding
If the kid grows up and assaults these two monsters, I will rush to her defense. What's the difference between this and severing a leg in utero? These two dykes can take solace in one last, fitting irony: no one will hear their screams in Hell.
11 posted on 04/08/2002 11:38:16 AM PDT by Mr. Bird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Notwithstanding
After tests on their baby son showed he also had severe problems, they decided against giving him a deaf aid in the one ear that still has some hearing, saying they will leave the decision to him when he is older.

That's grounds for taking this little boy away from these witches, imho.

12 posted on 04/08/2002 11:39:46 AM PDT by vikingchick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Notwithstanding
Tie their tubes, and take their tots!
13 posted on 04/08/2002 11:41:26 AM PDT by meandog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Notwithstanding
In an interview with the Washington Post, the women - Sharon Duchesneau, who gave birth, and Candace McCullough, her lesbian lover - say that they believe deafness is "an identity not a medical affliction that needs to be fixed".

Wonder what she thinks of stupidity?

While I see no reason to be upset that this couple would want to "bring a handicapped child into the world" (the alternative raises the specter of eugenics) I do see a reason to be upset that this couple would deliberately attempt to handicap a child. If two deaf people (of the opposite sex) want a child, and the child will have a 50% or greater chance of being deaf, then I have no problem. But this case is not that case.

Shalom.

14 posted on 04/08/2002 11:41:38 AM PDT by ArGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Notwithstanding
After their daughter's first hearing test, the couple wrote happily in her baby book: "Oct 11, 1996 - no response at 95 decibels - DEAF!'' Their daughter attends a special kindergarten for children with hearing problems.

Anyone else besides me having a mental image of this child in a lawyer's office in about 15 years?

16 posted on 04/08/2002 11:42:24 AM PDT by Lizavetta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Notwithstanding
This is perhaps the most disturbing post I've read on FR.
17 posted on 04/08/2002 11:42:30 AM PDT by eastsider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Notwithstanding
What a couple of MORONS! Just proves that the Dyke gene replaces the common sense gene!
19 posted on 04/08/2002 11:44:32 AM PDT by rightwingextremist1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Notwithstanding
Even a leading member of the American National Association for the Deaf, Nancy Rarus, said she "can't understand why anyone would want to bring a disabled child into the world".

I would hope that Ms. Rarus's statement was taken out of context, and that she was not talking, in general, about aborting children that might be born with a disability, but instead talking about someone deliberately trying to create a disabled child.

20 posted on 04/08/2002 11:44:50 AM PDT by CedarDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Notwithstanding;khepera
Too bad they couldn't find a perverted, IQ challenged donor also. Homosexuals shoudln't have children and shouldn't be allowed to raise them either. What are they going to do with a boy? I know what they intend for the poor girl...
21 posted on 04/08/2002 11:45:23 AM PDT by wwjdn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Notwithstanding
Both women, who are in their mid thirties, belong to a radical school of thought that believes deafness is a "cultural identity" not a handicap.

Their daughter attends a special kindergarten for children with hearing problems.

Anyone else besides me see a contradiction here? It's not a handicap, see, but she's in special ed because of her 'non-handicap'.

23 posted on 04/08/2002 11:46:01 AM PDT by Lizavetta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Notwithstanding
What a loving thing for a parent to do, intentionally deprive a child of one of their senses.
26 posted on 04/08/2002 11:47:15 AM PDT by Bikers4Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson