Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/09/2002 8:31:46 AM PDT by scratchgolfer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: scratchgolfer,monkeyshine, ipaq2000, Lent, veronica, Sabramerican, beowolf, Nachum, BenF, angelo,
Last ping for while. This is getting ridiculous:)

PINGING!   ) ) ) )  

If you want on or off me Israel/MidEast ping list please let me know.  Via Freepmail is best way.............


2 posted on 04/09/2002 8:36:39 AM PDT by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: scratchgolfer
Sharon should keep ignoring us and move on.

Anyone catch the Israeli parliament meeting on Cspan this morning? I caught about two minutes in a patients room. It was pretty rowdy.

3 posted on 04/09/2002 8:36:57 AM PDT by linn37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: scratchgolfer
I think the attitude in Washington is...We pay your salary, so do it and do it now!
5 posted on 04/09/2002 8:38:43 AM PDT by B4Ranch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: scratchgolfer
SHARON DOESN'T WORK FOR BUSH

Note to John and his father Norman: Israel's ability to act independently is limited by the fact that it accepts a large amount of military aid from the USA. Remember: ANYTIME you accept federal money that there are always strings attached.

6 posted on 04/09/2002 8:39:34 AM PDT by Clemenza
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: scratchgolfer
Thirteen(?) IDF members killed today in a booby-trapped building?

Keep pressing, Israel. Bring back the light.

9 posted on 04/09/2002 8:40:44 AM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: scratchgolfer
The American taxpayer works for Sharon! Stop all aid to both Arabs and Jews. They don't deserve our money!
12 posted on 04/09/2002 8:46:04 AM PDT by Eternal_Bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: scratchgolfer
They indicate that the US media have decided the story line ought not to be the war between Israel and the Palestinian Authority, but rather a developing rift between the United States and Israel based on Israel's recalcitrance.

This is so true. The media does this all the time. Criminy, it makes their job so much easier. Much easier to cover and report about a relational rift rather than focus on the substantive issues. I have said this before but the mainstream media has become nothing but a bunch of glorified gossip hounds. My reading of Bruni's book, Ambling Into History, only solidified this thinking of mine.

God, I hate the press.

13 posted on 04/09/2002 8:46:33 AM PDT by Wphile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: scratchgolfer
Sharon is his own man who has his own agenda. Anyone who doesn't understand that hasn't watched him for very long. (Dubya...you listening?)

One can change Sharon's timetable, but one can not change Sharon's objectives or his road map to get to his objectives.

Dubya may think he has some control in how things develop, but he is just a patsy being played like a fiddle. Events are mostly out of US control now (except for a war with Iraq). It is always a bummer to a big country when things get out of their control, they aren't used to it.

Dubya...hate to tell you...but you are mostly just along for the ride now.

Spiral
15 posted on 04/09/2002 9:10:26 AM PDT by Spiral
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: scratchgolfer
Sharon Doesn't Work For Bush...

Actually, he does. "He who pays the piper calls the tune"...

16 posted on 04/09/2002 9:10:36 AM PDT by The Green Goblin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: scratchgolfer
"Gen. Powell, you're a military man," Russert said to the secretary of state. "When the president of the United States says, ‘withdraw without delay' and Gen. Sharon says, ‘Well, we'll begin to expedite things,' is that insubordination?"

That's one of the stupidest things Timmy has said on air. PM Sharon is the Head of State of a sovereign nation...not an American General, and as such is not subordinate to our President.

My personal belief is that W and Sharon have a complete understanding about the situation in the ME and are in agreement as to Israel's actions.

17 posted on 04/09/2002 9:12:03 AM PDT by pgkdan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: scratchgolfer
the amazing suggestion that Ariel Sharon somehow is in the employ of George W. Bush.

Pohoretz blundered into the truth. Sharon does not work for Bush....Israel is on the U.S. payroll.

Regards

J.R.

21 posted on 04/09/2002 9:20:31 AM PDT by NMC EXP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: scratchgolfer; Veronica; dennisw; sabramerican; nachum; thinkin' gal; oldeconomybuyer...
Powell had a surprisingly tough but appropriately dismissive response to this peculiar notion: "Oh, please," the secretary of state said. "Prime Minister Sharon is the elected leader of a democratic sovereign nation."

Wow, Powell said this!?

Well, despite the fact that Powell said it, it is correct. Israel taking aid from us entitles us to a certain amount of influence, but they are not our slaves or our colony, which must always defer to us. The fact that they took many Scud hits in 1991 without responding, due to our request, conclusively demonstrates to me that we do have lots of influence. The fact that Israel always pulls its punches with the terrorists when Zinni or someone else comes from our country to arrange a cease fire or to talk peace - this also demonstrates that we have a lot of influence or control over their policy. By the way, compare Israel's actions to those of the terrorists - they step up terrorism when a negotiator arrives.

The key point is that Bush's obligation is to do what is best for the US; Sharon's responsibility is to his nation. Though we are close allies, though we give Israel lots of aid, though Israel shares valuable and sometimes vital intelligence with us, depite any other ties we may have - these are 2 independent nations. Each must, if it is to retain its independence, continue to do what it perceives to be in its own best interest. Much more often than not, our interests coincide, and there is total cooperation.

Sharon is only pursuing a war on terrorism in his nation, as we have done, are doing and will do ourselves. Bush himself said that we will go anywhere to protect ourselves - why shouldn't Sharon do the same? And, by the way, Sharon isn't going 8,000 miles away - he's doing it in his own country. What would we do if there were daily suicide bombings here by a known enemy - would we kowtow to any other nation, no matter how closely allied, and not respond in the way we thought was best? I think not, and to expect Israel and Sharon to just stop, especially when the PLO and the other terrorists still haven't even verbally committed to stop the suicide bombings, is moronic and arrogant. In fact, this is why I believe that Sharon and Bush are playing "Good cop, bad cop" with the terrorists and their supporters throughout the Arab world. Though I am somewhat taken aback by the hypocracy in some of our recent statements about Israeli withdrawal, I think that it is part of something larger and (so far) hidden.

22 posted on 04/09/2002 9:22:45 AM PDT by Ancesthntr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: scratchgolfer
I'm not sure why people are bleating when Israel doesn't just throw in the sponge when Bush - under obvious pressure from the Petroleum dictatorships - called for an immediate withdrawal. Plenty of Arab states have called for Bush to withdraw from Afghanistan and he's not obliging them. Bush, a month ago and then again two weeks ago and plenty of other times, called on Arafat to stop the terrorist bombings and Arafat ignored him. So howcome Israel is singled out for being a villain because it won't quit its war on terrorism halfway through?
25 posted on 04/09/2002 9:31:06 AM PDT by DonQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: scratchgolfer
The idea that Israel is solely a client state with no right of dissent from U.S. governmental opinion derives entirely from the fact of U.S. assistance to the Jewish state.

This isn't exactly right. The idea that Israel is a "client state" derives entirely from the fact that it simply could not exist without U.S. assistance (financial and diplomatic). It's also worth noting that even if Israel abandoned the occupied territories and allowed the creation of a Palestinian state under all of Arafat's terms, this Palestinian state would not be viable without an enormous amount of outside assitance.

31 posted on 04/09/2002 10:37:19 AM PDT by Alberta's Child
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: scratchgolfer
Good article.
49 posted on 04/09/2002 3:12:51 PM PDT by Lent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson