Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Top U.S. Clergy Pin Church Woes on Gay Priests
New York Daily News ^ | 4/24/02 | HELEN KENNEDY

Posted on 04/24/2002 2:11:43 AM PDT by kattracks

VATICAN CITY

Top American clergy fretted yesterday that too many gays were becoming priests and their presence — particularly in seminaries — was hurting recruiting.

"It is an ongoing struggle," said Bishop Wilton Gregory, who was at the Vatican summit, "to make sure the Catholic priesthood is not dominated by homosexual men."

In unusually frank comments on an issue the church generally shies away from, Gregory, head of the U.S. Conference of Bishops, said the clergy faces recruitment problems "when there does exist within any given seminary a homosexual dynamic that makes heterosexual young men think twice before entering for fear they may be identified with that orientation or that they would be harassed."

He said seminary recruiters must make sure "the candidates we receive are healthy in every possible way — psychologically, emotionally, spiritually, intellectually."

The church does not officially forbid homosexual priests as long as they abide by celibacy rules.

Chicago's Francis Cardinal George said gays should be kept out of the priesthood, putting a subtle theological spin on the question.

"The important thing in seminary formation is to ask whether or not the candidate is capable of marriage and family — because an ordained priest is a married man, he's a committed man to the Bride of Christ, which is the church," George said.

Detroit's Adam Cardinal Maida said homosexuality is at the root of the church's sex problems.

"I think what the behavioral scientists are telling us, the sociologists, it's not truly a pedophilia-type problem but a homosexual-type problem," he said. "We need to look at our seminaries and see that we're doing a good job screening candidates."

Gay Catholic groups said they were outraged that the church appears to be blaming the pedophilia scandal on homosexuality.

Jeff Stone, a board member of Dignity New York, noted that the comments come on the heels of Msgr. Eugene Clark's comments at St. Patrick's Cathedral on Sunday that appeared to link the scandal with homosexuality.

"We were just celebrating a little bit that the archdiocese had backed away on Msgr. Clark's comments, and now comes this bombshell," Stone said. "I think it's outrageous and appalling that the bishops are clearly trying to put this entire scandal on gay clergy."

Linda Pieczynski, a board member of Call to Action, fumed.

"I'm sorry, but this ... scapegoating is evil," she said. "How weak is their calling if they get the willies about being around gay men?"

With Derek Rose




TOPICS: Breaking News; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: catholicbashing; catholiclist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 281-286 next last
The church does not officially forbid homosexual priests as long as they abide by celibacy rules.

The church should take their lead from the boy scouts.

1 posted on 04/24/2002 2:11:43 AM PDT by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kattracks
"How weak is their calling if they get the willies about being around gay men?"

Ah, could I broach the subject by saying, "That's exactly what they're afraid of getting Bright Path!"  It's not from being around them.  It's from them.  Duh!

2 posted on 04/24/2002 2:17:57 AM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
The church does not officially forbid homosexual priests as long as they abide by celibacy rules.

Can someone explain this one to me? It is my understanding that celibacy is defined as one who does not marry; one who practices sexual abstinance. So how in the hell do the pillow biters get away with just because they are not having sex with a woman, they a celibate?

Get rid of the queers--get rid of the problem. Simple as that.

SR

3 posted on 04/24/2002 2:22:30 AM PDT by sit-rep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Catholic_list;ken5050; Slyfox; rose; ClearBlueSky; Aunt Polgara; Codie; ELS; katnip;viadexter...
p i n g

Indexing

4 posted on 04/24/2002 2:26:29 AM PDT by history_matters
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
I have no quarrel with them adopting the Boy Scout model. How the heck did we get here anyway? But this is absolutely the wrong time to make the case for such in my opinion. I absolutely equate this as a homosexual act, however blaming it on that alone is missing the mark in my book. Heterosexual oriented Priests looked the other way as this happend. To blame this solely on Homosexuals is a terribly self-serving thing to do. The criminality involved here wasn't isolated to one sexual preference IMO. Perps maybe. Silent partners no.
5 posted on 04/24/2002 2:27:00 AM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
You're right, the blame must be shared, but the root problem must also be faced ASAP.
6 posted on 04/24/2002 2:29:04 AM PDT by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Hey, at least someone gets it - BUMP!

The infiltration of this malignancy into the Church and it's propagation and subsequent cover up is the reason the church is having this problem. Now that they are beginning to understand this maybe they can fix it.

7 posted on 04/24/2002 2:45:18 AM PDT by Caipirabob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yakboy; kattracks
I have sometimes contemplated what it would take to take on a life of celebacy as a Priest. Not that I every contemplated actually doing it for real, but the thought itself intrigued me. I honestly can't see the decision to live a life of celebacy coexisting with the thought that homosexuals would be holding that same position within the church. Such an oath would be done in the interest of living as pure a life as possible separate from earthly desires. Viewing homosexuality the way I do, the very thought that this position would be open to homosexuals would destroy my whole mind-set.
8 posted on 04/24/2002 2:58:09 AM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Here we go. We knew it would happen. The gay defense begins.
9 posted on 04/24/2002 3:18:01 AM PDT by RAT Patrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
"How weak is their calling if they get the willies about being around gay men?"

Just attend one gay pride parade and you'll understand completely why straight men would get the willies around that bunch.

10 posted on 04/24/2002 3:25:09 AM PDT by Zorobabel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RAT Patrol
I don't consider it a "defense".Its actually being honest about one of the root causes of the problem.And,a root cause of a few other societal problems,in my opinion.
11 posted on 04/24/2002 3:27:57 AM PDT by John W
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Comment #12 Removed by Moderator

To: sit-rep
"Get rid of the queers--get rid of the problem. Simple as that."

Not quite that simple. The problem arouse directly from pedophiles in the clergy, but the problem became ongoing and monumental in size because of the hierarchy – who thought they had to protect The Church at all costs, by covering up the problem.
The Pope did insinuate that violations of law concerning child molestation should be reported immediately and directly to law enforcement agencies.
If The Church wants to regain the trust and respect of the faithful, all violations of law should have been included. Who knows what might be the next scandal.

13 posted on 04/24/2002 3:45:59 AM PDT by R. Scott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: R. Scott
Not quite that simple. The problem arouse directly from pedophiles in the clergy

Whoa not quite that simple either! The problem arose originally from pedophiles and homosexuals who were enabled in their pursuits by a heirarchy that I beleive is itself homosexual.

Medicine may want to draw some distinction between a pedophile and homosexual but the NAMBLA cohort has already insisted that 8 is too late. Where are the screaming queens throwing condoms at NAMBLA?

14 posted on 04/24/2002 3:57:01 AM PDT by ninonitti
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
If they focused on INDIVIDUALS committing CRIMES maybe we would be getting somewhere, but if that CRIMINAL had gone to CONFESSION???...is there a CATCH-22?

Is there any JUSTICE for the VICTIM in the CHURCH?

15 posted on 04/24/2002 3:57:27 AM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
"Gay Catholic groups said they were outraged that the church appears to be blaming the pedophilia scandal on homosexuality"

I've heard that, but I also heard somewhere else that 95% of the cases are with teenage boys. If true, that's more homosexual than pedophilic.

16 posted on 04/24/2002 4:13:41 AM PDT by elfman2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Gregory, head of the U.S. Conference of Bishops, said the clergy faces recruitment problems "when there does exist within any given seminary a homosexual dynamic that makes heterosexual young men think twice before entering for fear they may be identified with that orientation or that they would be harassed."

A friend of mine entered the seminary last year. He skipped local St. John's Seminary in Brighton (under Cardinal Law) for this very reason. He's now at a traditionalist seminary (with a "no poofta" policy) under Bishop Bruskewitz in Nebraska.

I'm very happy that the Cardinals have spoken the unspeakable word. Now things will get interesting.

17 posted on 04/24/2002 4:14:04 AM PDT by Aquinasfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #18 Removed by Moderator

To: DoughtyOne
It appears that almost all of the victims were boys which means same sex (homosexual = solely attracted to the same sex).
19 posted on 04/24/2002 4:49:30 AM PDT by AppyPappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
"The church does not officially forbid homosexual priests as long as they abide by celibacy rules." The church should take their lead from the boy scouts.

This is beyond being misleading...this is pure de wrong! Back at the beginning of VaticanII in 1961 the was a document prohibiting the ordaination of homosexuals and this document is still current...has not been altered or repealed. So now we have the major newspapers misrepresenting Magisterial teachings to the general public and the catholic at large. Time to blast back at this paper, folks!
20 posted on 04/24/2002 4:54:02 AM PDT by Domestic Church
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 281-286 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson