Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Arab Christian clergymen call Jews 'satanic'
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | Wednesday, May 1, 2002

Posted on 04/30/2002 11:26:55 PM PDT by JohnHuang2

Outraged by the protracted standoff between Israelis and Palestinians at the Church of the Nativity in Bethlehem, a considerable number of Arab Christian clergymen – including some heads of various churches – are publicly condemning not only Jews and Israel, but Christians in the West – especially in the United States – for siding with Israel.

Here, as translated by the Middle East Media Research Institute, are recent statements made by several Arab Christian clergy. MEMRI is an independent, non-profit organization that translates and analyzes the media of the Middle East.

Attacks on Christians in the West

Father Manuel Musalam, head of the Latin Church in Gaza, told Palestinian Authority television:

Father Musalam voiced similar sentiments at a meeting between heads of church in Gaza City and a delegation of Muslim clerics from the Palestinian Authority's Ministry of Religious Endowments:

During the same meeting, Bishop Alex, head of the Roman Orthodox Bishopric of Gaza, said: "Real Christianity means love and harmony, and it exists only in Palestine and the Holy Land. In contrast, Western Christianity is false. Anyone who claims he is a Christian but has no love or tolerance in his heart is no Christian."

Condemnations of Protestantism and the American political leadership were voiced by the Egyptian Coptic Church as well, which typically enjoys good relations with the West via the Coptic communities in the U.S., Canada, and Australia. In an article titled, "Oh Mr. Bush, Are You Christian or Crusader?" Coptic priest Marcus 'Aziz Khalil wrote:

Egyptian Shura Council member Dr. Nabil Luka Babawi, an expert in criminal law and a Copt, attacked President Bush in an article titled "Judas Is Back":

Babawi published another article in the Egyptian government daily Al-Ahram slamming his fellow Copts living in the West for their failure to support the Palestinians:

Elias 'Awwad, head of the Palestinian Roman Orthodox Church, said, "The Zionist movement controls European and American public opinion … For this reason, we witness a weakness in the defense of the Christian holy sites on the part of America and the European countries ... These people [Western Christians] deal first of all with their interests, not their religion. … In my view, they are not Christians, because they do not act according to the precepts of the New Testament. …"

The Bishop of the Assyrian Orthodox Church of Mt. Lebanon and Tripoli, George Saliba, stated the following regarding Christian leaders in the West:

Jews throughout the generations

Father Manuel Musalam compared the armed Palestinians in the Church of the Nativity to Jesus on the cross:

In a letter to the editor of the Egyptian Coptic weekly Watani, Egyptian Coptic clergyman John Jirjis wrote:

The Coptic priest Marcus 'Aziz Khalil wrote:

The Hezbollah television station Al-Manar gave its viewers an exclusive broadcast of a lecture on "Christianity's View of the Jews" by the Bishop of the Assyrian Orthodox Church of Mt. Lebanon and Tripoli, George Saliba, at an Islamic institute for religious studies. He said:




TOPICS: Front Page News; Israel; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last
To: MarMema
Certainly these people are not Eastern Orthodox Christians.

They claim otherwise. 'The Roman Orthodox Church is a member of the Standing Episcopal Conference. The oldest conference of orthodox bishops in the United States of America. Est. Anno Domini-1951. In paternal affiliation with the Ecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople.' This is from their linked 'Statement of Communion'. There is no mention of Middle East issues on the website, but there is something odd about it, including its claim to be an 'Orthodox Benedictine' group. Since it includes a denunciation of 'Caesaro-Papism', I guess that they can't stick this one on Rome.

41 posted on 05/01/2002 10:41:27 AM PDT by Lucius Cornelius Sulla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Stavka2; MarMema
This is rather off-topic for this thread, so I won't go into it at great length, but anyone with a pair of eyes can see that nationalism has always been one of the great afflictions of the Orthodox Church, which for lack of an outside focus, often identifies all too closely with the country or ethnic group where it finds itself. This is one of the reasons, MarMema, that the OCA took the name Orthodox Church IN America rather than OF America.

Don't be so ready to take offense! I criticized the Catholic Church, too. We have to be willing to look at problems in our churches objectively, and the problem of fragmentation and excessive national identification is certainly an Orthodox problem.

42 posted on 05/01/2002 10:48:41 AM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Lucius Cornelius Sulla
Yes, they claim otherwise. SCOBA, however, lists these members; Orthodox Church in America, Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of America, Antiochian Orthodox Christian Archdiocese, Serbian Orthodox Diocese, and the Ukrainian Orthodox Church in the USA.

Simply put, we've never heard of them!

And if I only had a nickel for every group that put up a website claiming to be recognized by the Ecumenical Patriarch!

43 posted on 05/01/2002 10:50:37 AM PDT by FormerLib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: livius
This is one of the reasons, MarMema, that the OCA took the name Orthodox Church IN America rather than OF America.

Well, you're certainly making it very clear how little you understand of the Orthodox!

The Orthodox Church is ONE church. The OCA is the part of the Orthodox Church that is IN America! Get it!

If they wanted to be a solely nationalist church, then they would have selected "Orthodox Church OF America."

Begone, bigot! Your lies are recognized for what they are.

44 posted on 05/01/2002 10:53:27 AM PDT by FormerLib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
So it seems that the crazy gene is carried on the "Arab" chromosome rather than the "Muslim" chromosome. Ralph Peters reached the same conclusion here in the WSJ Monday.
45 posted on 05/01/2002 10:56:52 AM PDT by white trash redneck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BibChr
What most people, including the Jews, miss is that the Jews/Hebrews were choosen not for some genetic purpose or other such superiority, but because of their acceptance of God's commandments. As such, none religious Jews are no more choosen people then say Hindues. With the coming of Christ, the Choosen People were expended to more then just Hebrews but also to Gentiles. Officially. While this was officially done, in practice, this had already happened but to a smaller degree. The Samaritans and even the God Fearers (certain Greeks) had already become Jews though they were not Hebrews. So, in other words, even in days before Christ, it was alredy established that belief was more important then some genetics. Thus, to be of Isreal has truelly nothing to do with who your mother was.
46 posted on 05/01/2002 11:05:08 AM PDT by Stavka2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Po-ka Khattab
No, what he is saying that the Jews will convert because at last they will accept He whom they did not accept the frist time. So, in the end we will all still be with the Messiah, Christ.
47 posted on 05/01/2002 11:06:28 AM PDT by Stavka2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Po-ka Khattab
The Orthodox Church does not accept the automatic damnation of man. Even none Christian, who lead a sacremental life, can be saved. To believe otherwise would be to damn Christianity. Why? Simply, to take an example of a man who never heard of Christ but lived a righteous life is still damn, is to say that God creates people to be damned, which means there is predestination and no free will. If there is no free will, then what was the point of Christ?
48 posted on 05/01/2002 11:08:46 AM PDT by Stavka2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Stavka2
Nnnnnno. That's only part of the truth, and part-wrong.

It is a covenant with Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, involving their descendents. Read Jeremiah 31:35-40; Israel as a national entity has a place in the plan and economy of God FOREVER.

At the same time, a relationship with God could always be had by anyone of any race by faith in God's Word. But that doesn't erase national distinction in terms of God's unconditional covenant.

Nor is this to be confused with the church of Christ, which didn't exist until Pentecost, and which is not in any way Israel (nor is it ever so called in the Bible).

Dan
The Science of Bible Reading

49 posted on 05/01/2002 11:13:12 AM PDT by BibChr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Lucius Cornelius Sulla
'The Roman Orthodox Church is a member of the Standing Episcopal Conference. The oldest conference of orthodox bishops in the United States of America. Est. Anno Domini-1951

Well I didn't know what the Standing Episcopal Conference was so I did a search on it and found this -

"The Standing Episcopal Conference (SEC) - a brotherhood of independent, self-governing Hierarchs and Jurisdictions in North & South America, Europe, Australia, New Zealand & the Phillipines. Established 10 years before SCOBA by its founding jurisdiction The Holy Orthodox Catholic Patriarchate of America."

Looks like they founded this SEC themselves. LOL. Still not related to us and perhaps not to you either.
Here is a site with some more info - here

That is definitely not one of our icons and I don't know who these people are. The fact that they celebrate a western rite and/or ( according to their site) accept the celebration of a western rite conclusively eliminates them from our recognition. There is no western rite in our church, period. Not that I am trying to stick them on you either. :-)

50 posted on 05/01/2002 11:19:11 AM PDT by MarMema
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: FormerLib
And if I only had a nickel for every group that put up a website claiming to be recognized by the Ecumenical Patriarch!

Seeing that this outfit apparently was virtually unknown until this Palestinian Authority story, I wouldn't be a bit surprised if the whole thing was financed by Saudi Arabia. (Seeing the Saudi position on Christianity it would certainly put somebody in an embarassing position though -- LOL!)

51 posted on 05/01/2002 11:21:48 AM PDT by Lucius Cornelius Sulla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: MarMema
Here is a site with some more info - here

They have a very pretty website, with lots of nice Java (I guess) scripts. Did you check out the history link on the page, it drops all kinds of names, which you are likely to make more sense of then I can. They seem to be claiming to be an offshoot of the Ukrainian Orthodox, as best as I can tell.

52 posted on 05/01/2002 11:31:57 AM PDT by Lucius Cornelius Sulla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: livius
anyone with a pair of eyes can see that nationalism has always been one of the great afflictions of the Orthodox Church

Yes I do see problems with nationalism in some of the Russian and Serbian Orthodox churches in this area, but not in the Greek or Antiochian churches. By this I mean some parishioners have a tendency to want to put issues like language or custom at the forefront, rather than God. It is a cultural nationalism and not a political one.

53 posted on 05/01/2002 11:35:28 AM PDT by MarMema
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Stavka2
It should be no surprise to you that BibCHris has a link entitled "The Science of Bible Reading".

LOL!!! The wedding of rationalism to Scripture.

54 posted on 05/01/2002 11:37:50 AM PDT by MarMema
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: MarMema
And finally I could tell you that as Christians, we Orthodox are closer to Judaism than any other Christian faith.

That wasn't the goal of Christianity.

One (Judaism) follows the letter of the law, while one (Christianity) follows the letter of grace.

I greatly appreciate the fact that you observe the biblical rituals based on the Jewish calendar (I suppose).

They follow a lunar month, while we observe the solar month in the western world.

All of the observances are great if we do them out of pure love and appreciation, instead of out of the observance of any law.

The feasts of Exodus 23 teach us much about Messianic expectation, and we can see them fulfilled in the person of Jesus.

I have never taken the Pesach Seder, but have studied it in-depth. I hope to attend one with my family in the residence of a Messianic (Jew) family one day.

I strongly believe that while we are not bound to the law, Christianity has lost the depth of some biblical understanding simply by ignoring the Jewishness (did I just make up a word?) of the Gospel.

God bless you,

Roger

55 posted on 05/01/2002 11:47:21 AM PDT by AlGone2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Lucius Cornelius Sulla
They seem to be claiming to be an offshoot of the Ukrainian Orthodox, as best as I can tell.

You have to wonder, if they had the cash and energy to begin a church, and they want so badly to be united with us, why not just start out with us?

We have several missions in this area now, both Greek and OCA. It is not so hard to start an Orthodox mission and be a real Orthodox church.

So what's the bottom line? What is it that they did not want to do or accept, and why hasn't SCOBA acknowledged them? That's the really scary part of these Orthodox-wannabes out there. And I have seen the websites of other groups like this one, using the word "orthodox" and trying to look like us, even listing numerous links to our sites.

56 posted on 05/01/2002 11:59:26 AM PDT by MarMema
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
things have changed here on FR. Six to eight weeks ago if someone posted this article there would be an organized effort of bigotry to shout all kinds of frequently racially oriented insults and other disruptions to destroy the thread. They would try to provoke people into saying things to get the thread pulled. Today this thread is tolerated in a civil manner here. That is a very positive change here at FR.

I don't see what should be controversial about what the arab christians above are saying. Palestine has been a prison camp for the last 30 years as far as I can tell and about 5 million people live in that prison camp. The large majority of those people are completely innocent of anything. But they are treated as though they are guilty. They cannot travel it seems, for a long time they couldn't send their kids to schools, today I understand the PA has hate schools for them. But if you grew up among those 5 million palestinians you would see the Israelis as being bad people.

Jesus did speak very negatively towards the jewish hierarchy that rejected him, read Matthew, you'll see.

57 posted on 05/01/2002 12:09:16 PM PDT by Red Jones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MarMema
You have to wonder, if they had the cash and energy to begin a church, and they want so badly to be united with us, why not just start out with us?

I don't know. From my point of view, there is plenty to be done just getting the Ecumenical Patriarch and the Patriarch of the West to get back in communion with each other. After all, theologically we have more in common than either of us has with the Copts, and folks here are always confusing them and you (folks keep confusing liturgy with theology). Liturgy is a beautiful reflection of our faith, and there is a certain problem with history (what is a crusade or two among friends, right?), but it hopefully will not keep us apart for another thousand years.

58 posted on 05/01/2002 12:33:08 PM PDT by Lucius Cornelius Sulla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: MarMema
Even our women cover their heads for the same reason and our Icons have no pictures of the Father, since he is every where and every thing.
59 posted on 05/01/2002 12:33:09 PM PDT by Stavka2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: BibChr
The Church of Christ is the New Isreal, the metaphysical Isreal.
60 posted on 05/01/2002 12:37:57 PM PDT by Stavka2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson