Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

School may drop Lincoln holiday in favor of Cesar Chavaz birthday [California]
Oakland Tribune ^ | May 6, 2000 | Jason Bono

Posted on 05/07/2002 3:01:35 AM PDT by snopercod

SAN LEANDRO -- Abraham Lincoln may have to forfeit his solo holiday to Cesar Chavez on the San Leandro school calendar.

Beginning next year, Lincoln's holiday may be dropped to honor labor leader Cesar Chavez on his birthday, March 31, pending school board approval. Several board members have already expressed support for the idea.

The San Leandro Teachers Association voted last month to make the change; 65 percent were in favor.

"The diversity of our community is growing, and it looks beautiful and we want to honor our Latino families," said Thomas Morse, political action chairman for the union. "And the other reason, which is very important for union members, is that Cesar Chavez was a labor leader."

Because changing school holidays falls under labor contracts, the district's two other unions, the Classified School Employees Association and the Teamsters/Trade union, need to give support before the board can bump Lincoln.

"We can celebrate his memory when we have Presidents' Day," Morse said, referring to the district's day off on Feb. 18 this year, celebrated as Washington's Holiday.

Hayward schools have holidays for both Chavez's and Lincoln's birthdays. The issue has not yet been seriously discussed in Castro Valley or San Lorenzo.

Sina Fattahy, a member of San Leandro High School's Latinos Unidos club, said he would use a Cesar Chavez holiday to participate in rallies or get together with other Latinos.

"It won't change my opinion about that day and how I feel about it," said the 17-year-old senior. "That day is always a special day for me. It's a day that you feel pride for being Latino. It's a feeling of energy and power."

Though the issue is scheduled for action at the school board's regular meeting Tuesday, it likely will be scratched from the agenda, said Mike Martinez, the district's assistant superintendent for human resources.

Martinez said he is recommending it be removed to give the other unions more time to poll their memberships. Because the district wants to get its calendar out soon, a change to the Chavez holiday may have to wait until 2004.

San Leandro resident Paul Vargas, 33, said he is offended by the proposed change.

"They're taking away Lincoln's birthday. I mean, who do these people think they are? They're trying to rewrite history," said Vargas, who attended San Leandro schools from kindergarten to 12th grade.

Board member Louis Heystek said he came up with the idea after looking at the district's demographics. To the issue of rewriting history, he said, "I would hope that our view of history does not remain stagnant."

Heystek said Chavez has been not only a significant figure in Latino-American history, but in American history overall, for spearheading a movement to unionize workers and leading the United Farm Workers labor rights movement.

"That had an impact for minorities and Americans all over," Heystek said.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: balkanization; multiculturalism; tribalism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-150 last
To: Sam Cree
We do already. We call it "Labor Day".
141 posted on 05/10/2002 7:14:51 AM PDT by Dales
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
142 posted on 05/10/2002 10:24:42 AM PDT by BlackElk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
143 posted on 05/10/2002 10:26:03 AM PDT by BlackElk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: BlackElk
Wake up, sunshine.
144 posted on 05/10/2002 10:28:31 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
I certainly don't think you understand me but I do understand you since you continue to refuse to claim the slightest shred of conservative credential. You have, counselor, defaulted on the ideological argument and the historical argument by your refusal. Judgment has entered. Res judicata.

As to Dr. Fleming, he is my source. I respect his scholarship and his integrity and I am not going to waste time entertaining your impertinence and scholarly laziness and lack of historical integrity. Go to your slavery reparations meeting and stop butting in on conservative business. As far as doing your research for you, umm, Lincoln freed the slaves. Do something unnatural. Honest research, among other things.

145 posted on 05/10/2002 10:35:36 AM PDT by BlackElk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: CounterCounterCulture; snopercod; HangFire; Mercuria
Anyway, union goons already have their own holiday with Labor Day. And Latinos already have Cinco de Mayo, celebrated in enough communities in California, virtually a state holiday in its own right. And any holiday that celebrates a victory over the French is A-OK in my book. :)
 
If only the Latinos knew what they were celebrating...
 
The news was on the night of the 5th and the reporter was touring all these Cinco de Mayo celebratory events, asking folks what they were commemorating. After asking at least a dozen people in various locales, an older man, correcting the ignorance of his children, finally came up with "It's to celebrate a battle Mexico won".
 
Until then, all the answers had been, "It's Mexico's Independence Day" or "It's the cinco of Mayo".
 
(((sigh!)))
 
 
 
From the article:
 
Board member Louis Heystek said he came up with the idea after looking at the district's demographics. To the issue of rewriting history, he said, "I would hope that our view of history does not remain stagnant."
 
Can I get a projectile-vomit-alert for a line like that, please?

146 posted on 05/10/2002 10:42:41 AM PDT by AnnaZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
Not to allow bigoted liberal ignorance an opportunity to shine in. I talked to Dr. Fleming yesterday. He may be willing to answer your inquiry. Say you are the fellow who disagreed with Jim from Connecticut on the slave-holding history of the wives of Lincoln and Grant and Grant's renting of slaves to southern Illinois mines.

As Ronald Reagan (Nonsequitur writhes as though showered with Holy Water) used to say, it may not be that liberals are ignorant but they do seem to know so much that just isn't so.

Glad to see you are still lurking. As the delightful Evelyn observed in the first Mummy movie to Benny: Nasty little fellows like you always get their comeuppance! Of course, even smarmy Benny had more integrity than some Chicago lawyers we know.

147 posted on 05/10/2002 10:42:47 AM PDT by BlackElk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: BlackElk
I certainly don't think you understand me but I do understand you since you continue to refuse to claim the slightest shred of conservative credential.

If you understand so much then perhaps you can explain something to me. Please explain why I should have to present any credentials, conservative or otherwise, to you for your approval? Are you the sole determinant on who is conservative and who is not? If I don't meet your standards on what is conservative then I guess I'll just have to live with the disappointment.

148 posted on 05/10/2002 2:44:14 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: BlackElk
But if I ask him then where is your chance to gloat? Why not ask the good doctor yourself? Then you can post his response and his supporting evidence and shut all of us up. especially me. If I were to ask him then if you are right and I refuse to admit it, everyone will still believe that you are as full of crap as a Christmas turkey. But if YOU post the evedence that supports your ridiculous claims made in Reply 80 then I have nowhere to hide, do I? So let's have it. You say Mrs. Lincoln owned a slave? When and where? And let's not confuse ownership of a slave by Mrs. Lincoln with ownership of a slave by her father, because he was a slave owner and no denying it. Let's have then when and where of Grant's slave-renting business. The ball is in your court. I have no doubt that you'll drop it.
149 posted on 05/10/2002 2:52:40 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: AnnaZ
Actually, isn't Cinco de Mayo just a day to drink mucho cerveza, much like St. Patty's Day? ;)
150 posted on 05/10/2002 7:01:54 PM PDT by CounterCounterCulture
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-150 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson