[ASA Vet]

Why would a pedophile pay for pictures of clothed kids
when there are so many hard-core child porn sites out there?

In all the years I've been on the internet I've never stumbled across even one child porn web site.
I was under the impression that most child porn was insiders sending it via e-mail,
or maybe member only sites with passwords and such.

Am I wrong?

Are there any FReepers out there that have seen one of these "many hard-core child porn sites," themselves,
rather than "hearing about it from a trusted friend, group, news source, etc"?

[xm177e2]

Jeff Libman and Marc Greenberg

Am I the only one who wants the Mossad to off these two subhumans so the rest of us Jews don't look so bad?

[libertylover]

This is nothing but child abuse and should be dealt with accordingly.

[AppyPappy]

Billing, viewers are assured, will be discreet

You can trust a pedophile. Sure you can.

[lsee]

"We received so many inquiries," she wrote. "It left us dumbfounded."

That's because you're DUMB.

"Sorry, we just don't see girls, clothed, usually in bikinis, as harmful or immoral."

Considering that bikinis leave the children mostly UNCLOTHED means nothing to people who are concerned about the MONEY. The mentality of a parent who would exploit their own child's body for "college money" is the same as those women who "work" their way through college as strippers. The end justifies the means?

How sickening.

I'll never forget the time I had my van door open and was swiftly changing my toddler child's soiled shirt. A grandfatherly-looking man pulled up next to my van at that moment and got out of his car. He saw my child's exposed belly an instant before I pulled a clean shirt on. His eyes widened and he said, "Beautiful!" in this appreciative voice before walking swiftly away. My child was very young, but not too young to understand that this was not a normal thing for a grown man to say or a normal way for someone's eyes to look at a child. This man gave us ALL the creeps. "Why did he say that? I didn't like that!" I hardly knew how to answer. We were outside the library when this happened, but instead of going in as planned, I drove away, knowing that this guy was now inside.

My child had been called beautiful before, but instinctively knew the difference when it was said inappropriately. The thought of exposing their innocent child's image to the lustful eyes of strangers should send a quiver of wary revulsion down a normal parent's spine.

It is a small step from pictures to live "fashion shows", isn't it? Even children's fashion shows at the mall have always concerned me, given the number of non-parent men who usually gather to watch. What next for these precocious young children? And how soon will they begin to experiment sexually, now that they have crossed the barriers of normal modesty by prancing around nearly naked on camera?

[Always Right]

I think we need more understanding towards pedophiles, maybe teach tolerence of child rapists in classrooms. Show these links and teach kids how to practice safe pedophilia when they are adults. That reasoning makes perfect sense these days.

[EdReform]

Bump

[mountaineer]

"We get feedback like, 'I was a parent myself, but unfortunately lost my child in a accident, and it is good to see the children just having fun,'" he said.

Sure, parents suffering the incalculable grief associated with the death of a child seek comfort in photos of 11-year-old girls dancing seductively in see-through bras. Makes perfect sense.

[jaq]

I hate this whole thing. It's sick and immoral, but I have a question? Once they pass this law, how do they plan on enforcing it?

[sanchmo]

Parents insist they are hurting no one and are actually improving their kids' lives by fattening their college funds and boosting their self-esteem.

Isaiah 5:20 - Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness, who put bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter.
Matthew 18:6 - But if anyone causes one of these little ones who believe in me to sin, it would be better for him to have a large millstone hung around his neck and to be drowned in the depths of the sea.

[InvisibleChurch]

pigs

[proxy_user]

"And for many pedophiles, attracted emotionally as well as sexually to the innocence of children, pictures of scantily clad little girls or boys are almost as precious as nude photos.

Don't worry, Congress is preparing to pass a law to require adults to interact with children in a cold, unfeeling manner. This has already been implemented in the schools.

"Some of it was pictures of kids playing in parks that the members had taken.

Congress is preparing to ban parks and cameras. All for the sake of the children. Don't even mention beaches.

"It is a small step from pictures to live "fashion shows", isn't it? Even children's fashion shows at the mall have always concerned me, given the number of non-parent men who usually gather to watch.

The government has placed an order for the surplus small-size burkhas left over in Afghanistan. Wearing them will be compulsory.

However, parents will still be permitted to kiss and hug their own children, provided it is done in the privacy of their own home, and another adult is present.

There's still no word on the law requiring babies to change their own diapers.

[Hemingway's Ghost]

As a liberaltarian, I have no problem with this sort of behavior. No one's rights are being trampled upon; no one's getting hurt.

Kidding.

This is &#(%!#()%^!#(%^!#()%ing SICK!

[gilor]

This makes me so f***ing mad. I couldn't even read past the first few lines.
maybe this can help

[constitutiongirl]

Particularly sickening are the comments by the parents. Like the one bragging about her child's fat college bank account. "If you want college money, shake your *ss in front of a camera". And the parent who shows her little girl cooking in thigh-high stocking and high heels and then makes idiotic comments about advertising to sell goods...do elementary age school girls wear thigh-highs and heels? These people are virtually a hop, skip and jump away from pimping their own children.

[Wright is right!]

How utterly odd that this article was published - and so far discussed here - without so much as ONE SINGLE MENTION of Jon Benet Ramsey. Because this is the very same thing as child beauty pageants...except it's one kid and it's on tape. At the child beautify pageants, you can see LOTS of kids - LIVE. Same skimpy costumes, same sexy dances and skits. An eyebrow or two gets raised but no big deal.

BUT - let someone video tape their kid doing the same thing she might do at a child beauty pageant --- and everyone is all of a sudden in an uproar.

Be consistent, folks.

Michael

[ArGee]

"Who is anyone to tell my child at what age she can create and sell a product?" she said.

First of all, if the product is Jessi's sexy self, then Jessi's Mom needs to have her parenting license revoked.

Second of all, what will Jessi's Mom say when the killer of a brutally abused and murdered 12-year-old girl turns out to be one of Jessi's fans. The real danger isn't that one of these perverts will go looking for Jessi (although Mr. and Ms. Ramsey might disagree). the real danger is that one of these perverts might be my neighbor, and go after my daughter after getting excited by Jessi.

Shalom.

[Malacoda]

There is a special place in Hell (right up by the fire, I hope) for parents who exploit their children this way.

In my opinion, it's little better than pimping out a child.

This makes me sick.

[galt-jw]

child sacrifice has begun.

[Clemenza]

Started in Florida

Why am I not surprised...