Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: hscott
Well I agree with you as to the Palis true aims. But in 2000 why did they not accept the peace plan and yet after a short time continue with attacks on Israel?

They read world opinion well. They turned down essentially what they asked for, started the infitada, and it cost them nothing.

And they moved the starting point for "negitiations" forward. Even GWB BEGINS with the offer they turned down. What did they lose, a few martyrs?

From the perspective of the terrorists (and they have time on their side) they think they're winning, against Israel, and against the US.

Peace will only come after a decisive victory on the ground.

4 posted on 05/09/2002 8:08:59 PM PDT by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: SJackson
Peace will only come after a decisive victory on the ground.

Which Israel would have accomblished in "67" had the U.S. not stayed her hand. Israel was poised to overrun Egypt and much of the ME after being attacked by the coalition of all the Arab states. "Land for peace" deals only eroded Israels security over the years as the American forced retreat moved her into more indefensible and unsecure positions. The U.S. may be Israels only ally. But we have been a poor one. And now the barbarians are at our own gate.

5 posted on 05/09/2002 9:44:41 PM PDT by KDD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson