Skip to comments.
Press coverage of implanted chips distorted?
WorldNetDaily.com ^
| Saturday, May 11, 2002
| By Sherrie Gossett
Posted on 05/11/2002 12:53:56 AM PDT by JohnHuang2
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 next last
To: JohnHuang2
The stunning array of potential uses ADS is pushing aggressively include the implantation of prisoners, parolees, people under house arrest, children, the elderly, airport workers, nuclear power plant workers, gun owners and computer users (as a form of logon ID).
Enough said.
2
posted on
05/11/2002 5:27:03 AM PDT
by
DH
To: *Privacy_list;TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
Check the
Bump List folders for articles related to and descriptions of the above topic(s) or for other topics of interest.
To: UN_List;"NWO";RippleFire;freedomnews;brat;Doughty One;Rowdee;Mercuria;EOD GUY;Catholic_List...
To: madfly
EVERYONE PLEASE.
To:
Free the USA, seamole; 2Jedismom; 2sheep; Aliska;Aquinasfan; argee; Askel5; arielb...
ping
6
posted on
05/11/2002 12:01:56 PM PDT
by
madfly
To: JohnHuang2
There could be some benefit to the chips, on a volunteer basis. Maybe the chips could be used with pacemakers, to diagnose problems without having to go to the hospital, for example, or to jumpstart a stopped heart by remote control. But overall, I would never agree to any mandatory chip installation. If people want to put these things in their bodies, by all means go ahead.
The grey area I see is with children-- foolish parents will want to put a chip in their kids, so that they can track them down in cases of kidnapping, or to see if they are at the library or the arcade. This would be abusive in my view.
To: monkeyshine
Have these morons never heard of ID bracelets? Put a chip in that, for crying out loud.
I can't wait for the lawsuits in ten years when these implants break, cause cancer, or react to some IV drug-users choice of 'stimulation'.
To: frogandtoad; Domestic Church; BlessedBeGod; saradippity; maryz; Jeff Chandler; ken5050; Slyfox...
Important PING!
9
posted on
05/11/2002 12:36:13 PM PDT
by
Siobhan
To: Clemenza; nickcarraway; jrherreid; Coleus; Palladin; Aggie Mama; glorygirl; Diva; Stingray51...
Important PING
10
posted on
05/11/2002 12:37:31 PM PDT
by
Siobhan
To: madfly
That's the mantra of today: Surrender essential freedom liberty for security. Forget about the possible abuses. The government loves you. It's for your own good. You're not a terrorist, are you?
To: monkeyshine
It may be voluntary today, BUT will it stay that way???????????
12
posted on
05/11/2002 12:41:14 PM PDT
by
GailA
To: Teacher317
everyone wants a rusting, decades old piece of technology crap implanted in thier bodys don't they?
To: madfly
BTTT!!!!!
14
posted on
05/11/2002 12:45:38 PM PDT
by
E.G.C.
To: Teacher317
"I can't wait for the lawsuits in ten years when these implants break, cause cancer, or react to some IV drug-users choice of 'stimulation'."
"...And it will cause all, the small and the great, the rich and the poor, and the free and the bond, to have a mark on their right hand or on their foreheads, and it will bring about that no one may buy or sell, except him who has the mark, either the name of the beast or the number of its name..."
'...And the first went and poured his bowl over the earth, and a sore and grievous wound was made upon the men who have the mark of the beast, and upon those who worshipped its image. "
Not usually one to throw about Bible verses, but your comment struck an eeire parallel.
To: Tench_Coxe
and can you imagine the amount of dodgy surgeons accepting cash to remove them?
To: JohnHuang2
It's times like this that I'm GRATEFUL that I'm old. I don't like thinking about what
the future generations will be put through. I would go hide out in a cave before
I'd let these MFers implant ANYTHING in me. The implications of this idea are so deeply evil
that it takes my breath away.
To: JohnHuang2
I don't like it. I don't want it. I'll never get one. Thanks for the warning.
To: Judith Anne
Seems to be a constitutional issue. Bodily integrity.
To: Notwithstanding
Yes.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson