Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Suspected Islamic Militants (sic) Storm Indian Army Camp
Yahoo (Reuters) ^ | May 14, 2002 | Ashok Pahalwan

Posted on 05/14/2002 5:01:37 AM PDT by Aaron_A

Suspected Islamic Militants Storm Indian Army Camp

JAMMU, India (Reuters) - Suspected Islamic militants opened fire on bus passengers and attacked an army camp in Indian Kashmir (news - web sites) on Tuesday, killing nearly 30 men, women and children before being gunned down, the army said.

It was the bloodiest attack in nearly eight months in the region, the focus of a military buildup between India and Pakistan, and coincided with a visit to New Delhi by U.S. Assistant Secretary of State Christina Rocca to try to ease tension between the nuclear-armed neighbors.

Indian analysts said the raid would increase pressure on the Indian government to act against Pakistan-based Muslim rebels, but said they did not expect an immediate military response

Three militants, wearing army uniforms, opened fire inside a bus near the Ratnachak army camp killing several passengers. They ran off the bus and into the camp to an area housing family quarters, workshops and canteens.

Many of the victims were wives and children of soldiers stationed at the base about 15 km (10 miles) south of Jammu, winter capital of India's Jammu and Kashmir state.

The militants, suspected members of Islamic groups fighting Indian rule in Kashmir, were killed four hours after the start of the attack, in which 32 people, including the three raiders, died, an army spokesman in New Delhi said.

"Rebels in combat dress alighted from a (public) transport bus near the army camp after opening indiscriminate fire," a defense spokesman told Reuters in Jammu.

"After storming the gate, they injured the gate-keeper and after that they barged into the family quarters.

"They had AK 47s, they were firing all around, they had hand grenades, they had explosives. Once they reached inside the house, they wired the houses with the explosives," Major-General Mohan Pandey told reporters.

Television pictures of the bus showed shattered windows, holes blown in the side, and blood and broken glass on the floor.

"We were asked to get off the bus and as we were getting down they started firing," one of the passengers told Star News Television. "Some died, some were wounded. Three women were killed including my wife."

No one claimed responsibility for the attack, but police said they suspected members of the Pakistan-based militant groups Lashkar-e-Taiba or Jaish-e-Mohammad, who have launched suicide attacks on army installations in the past.

It was the bloodiest attack in Kashmir since 38 people were killed in a suicide raid on the state assembly in October.

INDIA-PAKISTAN TENSION

About a dozen Muslim separatist groups are battling Indian forces in Kashmir. At least 33,000 people have been killed since the revolt erupted in 1989. Separatists say the death toll is at least 80,000.

India accuses Pakistan of stoking the rebellion by arming militants and sending them across the border. Pakistan denies the charge, saying it provides only moral support for what it calls a legitimate Kashmiri struggle for self-determination.

Analysts said the attack on the army camp would increase pressure on the Indian government to retaliate against Pakistan-based militants, but stopped short of predicting immediate military action.

"Speaking personally, I don't think the chances are very high of a punitive mission but the pressures are growing on the government to do something," said defense analyst Bharat Karnad.

"The army is completely mobilized, the hardware is ready, the systems are all in place. It would be easy to mount some kind of action," he said.

India and Pakistan, which have fought two of their three wars over Kashmir, have been locked in a tense standoff since a December 13 raid on India's parliament that New Delhi blamed on Pakistani-based Kashmiri rebels.

More than a million men have massed along the border, backed by warplanes, tanks and missile batteries.

Pakistani military leader Pervez Musharraf banned several militant groups after the attack on the Indian parliament, including the two blamed by India for the raid.

Musharraf's spokesman said on Tuesday it was too early to say who was responsible for the attack on the army camp, but said there was clear frustration with Indian rule in Kashmir.

"We know that the atrocities of the Indian armed forces on Kashmiris inside Indian-occupied Kashmir...have increased so much they were killing 10 to 15 Kashmiris every day," Major-General Rashid Qureshi told Reuters.

"Obviously that would give rise to frustration and anger."

For weeks, analysts and diplomats have been warning of a rise in tension as the snow melts in the Himalayan mountain passes, making it easier for militants to cross into Indian Kashmir.

"It's only going to escalate. More and more infiltrations will take place now that the snows have melted," said political analyst Inder Malhotra.

And during the five months of army deployment, analysts have also said one more big militant attack -- like the raid on the army camp -- could trigger military action.

"Whether this will lead to war or a retaliatory strike is a very complex question," said Kalim Bhadadur, South Asia expert at New Delhi's Jawaharlal Nehru University.

"It would be too premature to say that because three terrorists have attacked a military camp...that the government will respond militarily. But the army is deployed."

India controls about 45 percent of Muslim-majority Kashmir, Pakistan a third and China the rest.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bombing; india; southasialist; suicide; terrorist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
"Suspected Islamic Militants"? Oh yeah...I guess it could have been Mossad.
1 posted on 05/14/2002 5:01:38 AM PDT by Aaron_A
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Aaron_A
I think it's waaaaaay past time for India to wipe these as*holes off the planet. Using the IDF model, they should easily be able to contain and eliminate the immediate as well as short term threat presented by "peaceful" Islam.
2 posted on 05/14/2002 5:07:29 AM PDT by mgc1122
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aaron_A
The cancer spreads. The Sword of Islam kills innocents. Victims of Islam must destroy all who embrace that theo-fascist cult of death.
3 posted on 05/14/2002 5:19:36 AM PDT by SevenDaysInMay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SevenDaysInMay
but, but, but... My President says, "Islam is a religion of Peace."
4 posted on 05/14/2002 5:23:57 AM PDT by PokeyJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: PokeyJoe
but, but, but... My President says, "Islam is a religion of Peace."

Diplomacy is the art of saying "nice doggie" while looking for a big enough rock.

5 posted on 05/14/2002 5:30:46 AM PDT by Salman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Aaron_A
"Many of the victims were wives and children "

Wild animal SOB'S!

6 posted on 05/14/2002 5:31:58 AM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #7 Removed by Moderator

To: Aaron_A
If the Hindus retaliate, we'll be reading some sympathetic stories about the innocent Muslims living in India being attacked for no reason by murderous Hindus.
8 posted on 05/14/2002 5:48:37 AM PDT by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SevenDaysInMay
Another day at the office for the Islamo-Fascists. It's them or us.
9 posted on 05/14/2002 6:14:42 AM PDT by tomahawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: PokeyJoe
"but, but, but... My President says, "Islam is a religion of Peace.""

but, but, but… The alternative is to let Osama define the war. As off the mark as your President's statement is, the alternative risks turning hundreds of millions around the world from Osama sympathizers to active supporters, defending Islam as Osama would have liked. I'd rather fight smart.

10 posted on 05/14/2002 7:00:31 AM PDT by elfman2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Aaron_A
There may be a perverse truth to this "Islam is Peace" thing - if you submit/surrender without resistance, there will be peace!
11 posted on 05/14/2002 8:22:40 AM PDT by mikeIII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mikeIII;Aaron_A
Oh, no, don't retaliate. Don't upset the war on the western border.
RReligion of pieces! Nice move on the eve of the US envoy's visit. Wanna see who gets called on to exercise restraint. After all, the Indians would not want to be seen hindering the US War on terror in the west of pakistan. This order to attack comes directly from Musharraf's office; another case of the pakistan military spinning the US envoy around in circles;

"tell the Indians not to attack us otherwise we won't be able to help you, the Americans, our wonderfully gullible and naive friends, in your war against terror. After all, the jihadi scumbags you are attacking are not the same as those brave 'freedom fighters' in Kashmir attacking women and children. After all, islam, prohibits 'unjustified' attacks on 'civilians. PS: we need more money to help you in the war against terror."

There has been a steady drip drip drip of attacks in the past few weeks as the mountain snows have melted. This is a black eye on the Indian security forces. A lethal attack on their own. Time for India, if it ever gets the will and the strategic vision to remove Pakistan from the maps of the world.

Tomorrow, the same scumbags killing indians will be on the other side of pakistan taking aim at Americans.

12 posted on 05/14/2002 8:45:30 AM PDT by swarthyguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: *SouthAsia_list
Check the Bump List folders for articles related to and descriptions of the above topic(s) or for other topics of interest.
13 posted on 05/14/2002 9:10:52 AM PDT by Free the USA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PokeyJoe
"Islam is a religion of Peace."

Not anymore...

14 posted on 05/14/2002 9:11:41 AM PDT by Windsong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mgc1122
Pakistan is on its way to extinction or re annexation by India.
15 posted on 05/14/2002 9:28:13 AM PDT by sheik yerbouty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Aaron_A
Pakistani military leader Pervez Musharraf banned several militant groups after the attack on the Indian parliament, including the two blamed by India for the raid.

Yeah, Reuters, how observant of you to not notice he then turned around and released leadership of the same terrorist groups. Remember? Pakistan said it might "need" them in a potential conflict with India, which was bullshit then and bullshit now and has cost these innocent people their lives.

Reuters S****. So does Pakistan and the liar Musharraf.

16 posted on 05/14/2002 10:02:42 AM PDT by keri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: swarthyguy, Red Jones, AM2000, MikeIII, atc,Travis McGee,Sawdring
Yes, it definitely puts some strain on the US-India relationship. We have to somehow pursuade the Indians to hold back everytime, because we need Paki co-operation. That's enough reason for Pakistan to egg these attacks on.

Doesn't look good from an India POV. Imo we need to change this mode of thinking....quickly.

17 posted on 05/14/2002 10:06:04 AM PDT by Aaron_A
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Aaron_A
A final caveat needs to be sounded. The American desire to carry its 'war on terrorism' into Pakistani territory is an extension and indeed, continuation of their Afghan campaign. It has nothing to do with the government's own domestic battle against terrorism. Therefore, any unilateral US military action in Pakistan, as hinted by The Washington Post on May 12, would be a disastrous destabilization and severely undermine the government's own anti-terror efforts at home. The minimum quid pro quo for Pakistan's unstinted cooperation to the US 'war on terrorism' is to get the Americans to ask their Indian friends to back off from brinkmanship on the border. India's withdrawing its half a million plus troops would defuse tension and ensure that Pakistan can pursue its campaign against terrorism with single-minded focus.
From today's Nation paper of Pakistan.
18 posted on 05/14/2002 10:13:18 AM PDT by swarthyguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: sheik yerbouty
Pakistan is on its way to extinction or re annexation by India.

Annexation would increase Moslems to a dangerous 30%! And the Moslems in Pakistan seem to be more militant than those in India! As Hitchens suggests, a break up into 4 countries is probably the best outcome.

19 posted on 05/14/2002 12:05:21 PM PDT by mikeIII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: mikeIII
You are assuming that a post war Pakistan would still have the same population numbers. I think not.
20 posted on 05/14/2002 12:13:04 PM PDT by sheik yerbouty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson