[Paul Ross]

Yes, so instead of blowing up the world 6 times, you can do it 8 times...end result? You guys are hillareous. Do you even have a concept of how big a crater, blast zone, fire ball and deadly nuclear radiation a 25 megaton city buster has? Try this: everything within 30 KM is dead, the fall out is much worse. Now, try and challenge your brain to come up with 1000 targets, let alone 2000+. But then again, you've got the same virus that Hitler and Stalin had: Bigger MUST be Better....more, more, more...you need to watch Doc. Strangelove a few times. Maybe you can lead in the cave race.

Your misspellings almost make me laugh, except your substantive points are just too demented for me to feel the slightest bit of hilarity. Wake up and smell the coffee. The Russians are the only ones to have tested a 100 megaton bomb. We do not deploy 25 megaton bombs on anything. Our MX missiles will soon be retired, and their warheads are typically far smaller than your grandiose ideas. Our Titan II's were loaded with the largest operational warhead we had, a 9 megaton bunker-buster. Dismantled in 1987, bud.

How much is the FSB paying you to haunt this site, and write your drivel?

[Stavka2]

Oh, I do it for free...to much fun. Yup, 9 Mega tons, that's definitly a "bunker buster" If the bunker was about 4 times the size of Nagasaki. Again, you have no clue of the power you are talking about. A bunker buster would be in the small kilotons. High kilotons and megatons are made for one purpose only, destroy cities.

[MarMema]

How much is the FSB paying you to haunt this site, and write your drivel?

Not to mention the fact that the "Ugly American" title is still well-deserved, in many cases.