[Stavka2]

Oh, I do it for free...to much fun. Yup, 9 Mega tons, that's definitly a "bunker buster" If the bunker was about 4 times the size of Nagasaki. Again, you have no clue of the power you are talking about. A bunker buster would be in the small kilotons. High kilotons and megatons are made for one purpose only, destroy cities.

[Paul Ross]

Wrong. The Titan II was always an early hard-target-killer to preclude the Soviet military leadership from thinking they could hide deep enough under mountains to survive the war and yet prevail. Not a city-attack weapon. This kind of warhead would be uneconomic for such an attack. Indeed, MULTIPLE small warheads are vastly more efficient (and far cheaper to make and deliver) for optimal dispersal of destruction on such 'soft' targets.

Interesting that you unrepentantly never admit when you're wrong about such elementary historical facts, but just move on to other aspersions and disparagements. Of course, you are still the product of your state education...wherever you happen to live. I will pray for both you and MarMema (yet another ugly American?), that you will seek after God in true humility, and seek for his will and grace for your lives....