HILLARY'S WAR DOUBLE TALK: 'John Kerry could not have said it worse himself.' (swift-vet audio)

hillary clinton, swiftvets.com, john kerry, The New York Times | 2.2.07 | Mia T

[Mia T]

HILLARY'S WAR DOUBLE TALK
'John Kerry could not have said it worse himself.' (swift-vet audio)
MISSUS CLINTON'S SATURDAY NIGHT LIVE PROBLEM - PART THREE


by Mia T, 2.2.07

Patently synthetic play-acting and carefully manicured sound bites like Mrs. Clinton's look out of touch. (Mr. Obama's bare-bones Webcast and Web site shrewdly play Google to Mrs. Clinton's AOL.) Besides, the belief that an image can be tightly controlled in the viral media era is pure fantasy. Just ask the former Virginia senator, Mr. Allen, whose past prowess as a disciplined, image-conscious politician proved worthless once the Webb campaign posted on YouTube a grainy but authentic video capturing him in an embarrassing off-script public moment.

The image that Mrs. Clinton wants to sell is summed up by her frequent invocation of the word middle, as in "I grew up in a middle-class family in the middle of America." She's not left or right, you see, but exactly in the center where everyone feels safe....

This how she explains her vote to authorize the war: "I would never have expected any president, if we knew then what we know now, to come to ask for a vote. There would not have been a vote, and I certainly would not have voted for it." John Kerry could not have said it worse himself. No wonder last weekend's "Saturday Night Live" gave us a "Hillary" who said, "Knowing what we know now, that you could vote against the war and still be elected president, I would never have pretended to support it."

Compounding this problem for Mrs. Clinton is that the theatrics of her fledgling campaign are already echoing the content: they are so overscripted and focus-group bland that they underline rather than combat the perennial criticism that she is a cautious triangulator too willing to trim convictions for political gain. Last week she conducted three online Web chats that she billed as opportunities for voters to see her "in an unfiltered way." Surely she was kidding. Everything was filtered, from the phony living-room set to the appearance of a "campaign blogger" who wasn't blogging to the softball questions and canned responses. Even the rare query touching on a nominally controversial topic, gay civil rights, avoided any mention of the word marriage, let alone Bill Clinton's enactment of the federal Defense of Marriage Act....

This, in other words, is a moment of crisis in our history and there will be no do-overs. Should Mrs. Clinton actually seek unfiltered exposure to voters, she will learn that they are anxiously waiting to see just who in Washington is brave enough to act.

Hillary Clinton's Mission Unaccomplished
By FRANK RICH
January 28, 2007
The New York Times

ohn Kerry could not have said it worse himself."

That wonderful turn of phrase by Frank Rich has the force to knock missus clinton off the stage finally, for good... (and for The Good).

There is a basic flaw in Rich's argument, however. Rich's criticism of clinton and her 'out-of-touch' campaign is constructive, as though clinton and her campaign are fixable.

Rich does not seem to understand that the clinton machine has no other option because its candidate is a dud.

With a Q score—a measure of celebrity likability among the hoi polloi—in the toilet, missus clinton can win elections only by running virtually unopposed... and then only with the help of protheses, props, poses, PR machines, scripted appearances, screened audiences, vetted questions, Secret Service barracades, secret police, softball settings and sycophantic hosts, fictionalizing, humanizing, digitizing and otherwise hiding the real hillary clinton.

And then we have the baggage....

Anyone else but a clinton would have been summarily laughed off the stage.

The American people must understand that to get this defective candidate elected, the clintons must pervert the electoral process, turn democracy on its head. That is to say, the best candidate must lose.

Hence the threats to the big donors.....

by Mia T
HILLARY CLINTON'S Q SCORE
Hollywood take note

COPYRIGHT MIA T 2007

HILLARY "Zelig" CLINTON:

WHEN A CONGENITAL LIAR'S RUTHLESS AMBITION EXCEEDS HER ABILITY

 

by Mia T, 12.20.06

 

 

illary clinton is the not-so Human Chameleon.

She is a paradoxical personification of nothingness.

She is a simplistic parody of Woody Allen's intricately layered Zelig.

The life of missus clinton is a mock documentary about a non-entity who takes on the characteristics of whatever strong--

or useful--personality she comes in contact with.

Missus clinton's life seems small, and there is a reason for it: There aren't any characters in it.

Missus clinton proves what Woody Allen merely hypothesizes: The erroneousness of the almost universally held postulate that everyone is someone.

A Scoundrel's Pythagorean Imperative

Mia T, 12.14.03

z = distance between flag lapel pin and chin

d = distance between midpoint of chin and jowl

y = distance between the midpoint of chin and top button

x = distance between top button and flag lapel pin

   

 

 

It isn't that they can't see the solution. It is that they can't see the problem.

G. K. Chesterton

 

... While America appears not to be ready for a female president under any circumstances, the post-9/11 realities pose special problems for a female presidential candidate. Add to these the problems unique to missus clinton. The reviews make the mistake of focusing on the problems of the generic female presidential candidate running during ordinary times.

These are not ordinary times. America is waging the global War on Terror; the uncharted territory of asymmetric netherworlds is the battlefield; the enemy is brutal, subhuman; the threat of global conflagration is real.

Defeating the enemy isn't sufficient. For America to prevail, she must also defeat a retrograde, misogynous mindset. To successfully prosecute the War on Terror, it is essential that the collective patriarchal islamic culture perceives America as politically and militarily strong. Condi Rice excepted, this requirement presents an insurmountable hurdle for any female presidential candidate, and especially missus clinton, historically antimilitary--(an image, incidentally, that is only enhanced today by her clumsy, termagant parody of Thatcher), forever the pitiful victim, and, according to Dick Morris, "the biggest dove in the clinton administration."

It is ironic that had the clintons not failed utterly to fight terrorism... not failed to take bin Laden from Sudan... not failed repeatedly to decapitate a nascent, still stoppable al Qaeda... the generic female president as a construct would still be viable... missus clinton's obstacles would be limited largely to standard-issue clintonisms: corruption, abuse, malpractice, malfeasance, megalomania, rape and treason... and, in spite of Juanita Broaddrick, or perhaps because of her, Rod Lurie would be reduced to perversely hawking the "First Gentleman" instead of the "Commander-in-Chief."

Mia T, 10.02.05
HILLARY'S COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF PROBLEM
(see descriptor morphs)

COPYRIGHT MIA T 2007

[Mia T]

ping

[Mia T]

ping

[stm]

This woman is as great a threat to this country as islamofascism.

[Mia T]

I think she's a greater threat. Will be posting on this shortly....

[Mia T]

ping

[Mia T]

ping

[Mia T]

ping

[Mia T]

ping

[Mia T]

ping

[Mia T]

ping

[Mia T]

ping

[Mia T]

CORRECTION--forgot to include her 'alinsky period':

 

From HILLARY "Zelig" CLINTON: WHEN A CONGENITAL LIAR'S RUTHLESS AMBITION EXCEEDS HER ABILITY:

This brilliant Alinsky-clinton observation by beyond the sea is the perfect segue to an analysis of Alinsky's influence on hillary clinton... which leads inexorably to hillary rodham's closely guarded Wellesley thesis. (Plan to do an extended piece on that shortly.)

In the Wellesley thesis, hillary discussed "how to change the American political culture." This discussion occurred in the context of a tribute to the leftist political organizer, her mentor, Saul Alinsky.

Does missus clinton reveal her own thoughts on the radicalization and even balkanization of the American political process? We can't yet say with certainty because the thesis has been sealed--closed to public scrutiny--from the moment missus clinton insinuated her radicalizing, balkanizing, liquidating self onto the national political stage.

If I had to guess, I would say she adopted Saul Alinsky's theories and practices without modification: hillary clinton exhibits no creativity, no vision of her own and tends to glom onto the latest fashion, whether it's Alinsky's Stalinist methods... or New Age occultism, recall her attraction to the teachings of

• Marianne Williamson, who some described as a "Jewish charismatic spiritualist"
• Ken Scott Nateshvar, yogi to the stars
• and the pièce de résistance, Jean Houston, the Director of the Foundation for Mind Research.

Houston was described by some as a "New Age" author who "studied psychic experiences and mystical connections to historical figures and other worlds." When the story of the Houston connection became public Houston became known as hillary clinton's "Eleanor Roosevelt Conduit."

Although she baked no cookies, didn't do illicit land or cattle deals and stood by no man, hillary clinton starred in the triple role of the Cook, the Thief and his Wife. Her lover was played at once vaporously and in workmanlike fashion by the ghost of Eleanor Roosevelt, with Janet Reno, between her stints rendering intermittent injustice for the Husband, as the reliable stand-in. Sidney Blumenthal was the stand-in for the Cook and Craig Livingstone the stand-in for the Thief. The last-minute addition of Christopher Hitchens as the snitch was a stroke of absolute genius notwithstanding its cerebral accident, its predictable-if-perfect pitch (or its facile alliteration).

by Mia T, January 3, 2006
Alien Abductions, Flying Saucers
+ Other Weird Phenomena, c.1992-2000

There is a great emotional likeness there too. Thank you for putting the photos side by side.

On Alinsky (http://www.vcn.bc.ca/citizens-handbook/rules.html)

For Alinsky, organizing is the process of highlighting what is wrong and convincing people they can actually do something about it. The two are linked. If people feel they don't have the power to change a bad situation, they stop thinking about it.

According to Alinsky, the organizer -- especially a paid organizer from outside -- must first overcome suspicion and establish credibility. Next the organizer must begin the task of agitating: rubbing resentments, fanning hostilities, and searching out controversy. This is necessary to get people to participate. An organizer has to attack apathy and disturb the prevailing patterns of complacent community life where people have simply come to accept a bad situation. Alinsky would say, "The first step in community organization is community disorganization."--beyond the sea

[E.G.C.]

BTTT

[OKSooner]

Frank Rich, of all people... BTTT

[Mia T]

thanx :)

[Mia T]

rich, indeed ;)

[An Old Man]

In the News/Activism forum, on a thread titled HILLARY'S WAR DOUBLE TALK: 'John Kerry could not have said it worse himself.' (swift-vet audio), stm wrote: This woman is as great a threat to this country as islamofascism.

Stm,

The danger from the "islamofascist" can be dealt with as we are now doing in Afghanistan and Iraq.

The danger presented by a "Socialist" who has openly declared that "We will take things away from you on behalf of the common good"; is far greater than that of the former. In the case of the former, they can easily be identified and dealt with.

Home grown Socialists such as Hillary Clinton are for now handicapped in that they cannot come right out and tell you all of the things they have planned for you if they are to get elected.

Socialist like Hillary Clinton hide behind the customs and mores of the society they infest and look for opportunity's to impose their will on the citizens. Queen Nancy is a perfect example of what you can expect if the Socialist Hillary Clinton is elected President.

You can defeat the attempt of the Socialist Hillary Clinton by simply exposing her for what she is. Someone who is out to see to it that anything you own or possess is confiscated by one method or another for redistribution to those she deems more deserving than you. In most cases the deserving will be a small group of indivduals closely associated with her. That's the way this socialist thing works

Semper Fi
An Old Man

[RightWhale]

Hillary! was as upset as anyone after WTC911, but unlike most she was upset that the Republican Admin would be grabbing headlines for a long time.

[Mia T]

excellent.

Let us not forget that missus clinton is also a Stalinist. Will be addressing that soon....