Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

STRANGE BEDFELLOWS: ED KLEIN AND SUSAN ESTRICH AGREE ABOUT HILLARY
Susan Estrich, NRO, Ed Klein, Hannity & Colmes | 10.14.05 | Mia T

Posted on 10/14/2005 8:34:12 AM PDT by Mia T

STRANGE BEDFELLOWS:
ED KLEIN AND SUSAN ESTRICH AGREE ABOUT HILLARY

[FOOL ME ONCE, SHAME ON YOU! FOOL ME TWICE, SHAME ON ME!]



by Mia T, 10.14.05



National Review Online: In a sentence, what is "the truth about Hillary"?

Edward Klein: Hillary is not a victim (not of sexism, not of her husband, and certainly not of this book); she's not a moderate (despite her effort to re-brand herself in the Senate). Even my sources on the left admit she's positioning herself as a victim and moderate in order to win the White House.

Interrogatory
NRO's Q&A
June 20, 2005, 7:54 a.m.
The Truth About Hillary
An author tells his story.

Q by Kathryn Jean Lopez


"The other thing that distressed me is that a woman has to make herself a victim to be popular. I find that really troubling. She's more popular when she's a victim.

Susan Estrich
Hannity and Colmes
The Broaddrick-Estrich-Cliff interview on the clintons' serial rape and predation

HEAR SUSAN ESTRICH: hillary plays 'the victim' for votes
Mia T, 10.13.05

While America appears not to be ready for a female president under any circumstances, the post-9/11 realities pose special problems for a female presidential candidate. Add to these the problems unique to missus clinton. The reviews make the mistake of focusing on the problems of the generic female presidential candidate running during ordinary times.

These are not ordinary times. America is waging the global War on Terror; the uncharted territory of asymmetric netherworlds is the battlefield; the enemy is brutal, subhuman; the threat of global conflagration is real.

Defeating the enemy isn't sufficient. For America to prevail, she must also defeat a retrograde, misogynous, troglodyte mindset. To successfully prosecute the War on Terror, it is essential that the collective patriarchal islamic culture perceives America as politically and militarily strong. Condi Rice excepted, this requirement presents an insurmountable hurdle for any female presidential candidate, and especially missus clinton, historically antimilitary, forever the pitiful victim, and, according to Dick Morris, "the biggest dove in the clinton administration."

It is ironic that had the clintons not failed utterly to fight terrorism... not failed to take bin Laden from Sudan... not failed repeatedly to decapitate a nascent, still stoppable al Qaeda... the generic female president as a construct would still be viable... missus clinton's obstacles would be limited largely to standard-issue clintonisms: corruption, abuse, malpractice, malfeasance, megalomania, rape and treason... and, in spite of Juanita Broaddrick, or perhaps because of her, Rod Lurie would be reduced to perversely hawking the "First Gentleman" instead of the "Commander-in-Chief."

Mia T, 10.02.05
HILLARY'S COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF PROBLEM


Estrich impeached by her own words

The usual clinton rube arrogance rooted in stupidity.

The clintons figured that Estrich in their corner would make clinton serial rape and predation just disappear, not understanding that her presence would only intensify the scrutiny and that her 'expertise' and prior utterances would be used against them... and her.

Indeed, by twisting her own scholarship, Estrich indicts the clintons just as surely as the twisting double helix on that blue Gap dress.


 

"Crucial to this protective wall was the secret police, a group of private detectives hired to protect hillary and 'Saturday night bill.' Their tactics included digging up dirt on women who might be linked to bill in order to cow them into silence. There is even some evidence of possible physical intimidation."

HEAR DICK MORRIS




 

"I got the letters from Pellicano to these women intimidating them. I had tapes of conversations from Pellicano to the women. I got handwritten letters from the women."

[Pellicano played a critical role in Mr. Clinton's 1992 presidential campaign by "suppressing" "inconvenient" accounts from several women, by concocting fraudulent "proof" (later discredited) that Gennifer Flowers doctored the damning tape of clinton, and again inside the clinton operation in January 1998, four days after the Monica Lewinsky story broke, to falsely paint Monica as simply a lying stalker, a claim later discredited by clinton's own DNA.]

MARY MATALIN
1997, CBS




 

There is reason to believe that he is a rapist ("You better get some ice on that," Juanita Broaddrick says he told her concerning her bit lip), and that he bombed a country to distract attention from legal difficulties arising from his glandular life, and that... [f]urthermore, the bargain that he and his wife call a marriage refutes the axiom that opposites attract. Rather, she, as much as he, perhaps even more so, incarnates Clintonism

GEORGE WILL
SLEAZE, THE SEQUEL




Connecticut Rep. Chris Shays said on a talk radio show Wednesday that, based on secret evidence he reviewed during the impeachment controversy, he believes President Clinton raped Juanita Broaddrick, not once, but twice.

Talk-show host Tom Scott of Clear Channel Broadcasting, New Haven (WELI 960) asked Shays about the mysterious impeachment "evidence room," prompting the GOP moderate to say that Broaddrick "disclosed that she had been raped, not once, but twice" to Judiciary Committee investigators.

Shays, who is often hailed by the New York Times for his independent judgment and good sense, found the evidence compelling:

"I believed that he had done it. I believed her that she had been raped 20 years ago. And it was vicious rapes, it was twice at the same event." Asked point blank if the president is a rapist, Shays said, "I would like not to say that it way. But the bottom line is that I believe that he did rape Broaddrick."

HEAR CHRISTOPHER SHAYS
'Shays Shocker Clinton Raped Broaddrick Twice'
National Review Online
By NR staff
8/02/2000




The rape took place while Bill was running for governor. Hillary came bursting into the room to talk to two people, one of whom I personally know.

She said "You won't believe what this [expletive] did now. He tried to rape some b*tch."

It was the job of these two to squelch the story.

doug from upland to Sean Hannity,
WABC, 10/16/00




 

"Who is Juanita Broaddrick? I've never heard of her!" cried Betty Friedan, the founder of modern feminism. Friedan's outburst came at last Friday's conference, entitled "The Legacy and Future of Hillary Rodham Clinton." Held at the American Enterprise Institute in Washington. D.C., the event offered a chilling microcosm of an angry, divided America.

For nearly an hour, a five-woman panel had been debating whether Hillary qualified as a "feminist heroine." I thought Broaddrick's claim of having been raped by Hillary's husband had some bearing on this point, so I broached the subject during the question-and-answer period. Friedan's dyspeptic denial followed.

Was Friedan telling the truth? Maybe. And maybe all those millions of Germans who professed ignorance of the death camps were telling the truth too. The problem is, having admitted her ignorance, Friedan showed no interest in exploring the matter further. And that was the problem with the Germans too.

Totalitarian impulses flourished at the conference. Taking a page from Soviet psychiatry, some Clintonites suggested that Hillary hating might be a mental illness.

Richard Poe
The Hillary Conspiracy




.In a letter to Mrs. Clinton recalling their meeting shortly after the reported assault occurred, she wondered about the significance of Mrs. Clinton's words to her at that time. Thank you, Mrs. Broaddrick says Mrs. Clinton told her, for "everything you do for Bill."

The not-so-subtle implication of the letter is that Mrs. Clinton is, in fact, her husband's enabler. Dealing with her husband's promiscuity and worse might keep her from dealing with the important issues facing the people of New York, namely her candidacy. One might call it a Faustian bargain except that even Mephistopheles might not lower himself to sign such a deal....

COMPLETE ARTICLE
Did he rape that woman, Juanita Broaddrick?
The Wall Street Journal
EDITORIAL
October 18, 2000





 

I remember it as though it was yesterday. I only wish that it were yesterday and maybe there would still be time to do something about what your husband, Bill Clinton, did to me. There was a political rally for Mr. Clinton's bid for governor of Arkansas. I had obligated myself to be at this rally prior to my being assaulted by your husband in April, 1978. I had made up my mind to make an appearance and then leave as soon as the two of you arrived. This was a big mistake, but I was still in a state of shock and denial. You had questioned the gentleman who drove you and Mr. Clinton from the airport. You asked him about me and if I would be at the gathering. Do you remember? You told the driver, "Bill has talked so much about Juanita", and that you were so anxious to meet me. Well, you wasted no time. As soon as you entered the room, you came directly to me and grabbed my hand. Do you remember how you thanked me, saying "we want to thank you for everything that you do for Bill". At that point, I was pretty shaken and started to walk off. Remember how you kept a tight grip on my hand and drew closer to me? You repeated your statement, but this time with a coldness and look that I have seen many times on television in the last eight years. You said, "Everything you do for Bill". You then released your grip and I said nothing and left the gathering.

What did you mean, Hillary? Were you referring to my keeping quiet about the assault I had suffered at the hands of your husband only two weeks before? Were you warning me to continue to keep quiet? We both know the answer to that question.

Yes, I can answer Brit Hume's question. You are the same Hillary that you were twenty years ago. You are cold, calculating and self-serving. You cannot tolerate the thought that you will soon be without the power you have wielded for the last eight years. Your effort to stay in power will be at the expense of the state of New York. I only hope the voters of New York will wake up in time and realize that Hillary Clinton is not an honorable or an honest person.

I will end by asking if you believe the statements I made on NBC Dateline when Lisa Myers asked if I had been assaulted and raped by your husband?

 

Or perhaps, you are like Vice-President Gore and did not see the interview.

DO YOU REMEMBER?
AN OPEN LETTER TO HILLARY CLINTON
BY JUANITA BROADDRICK
SUNDAY OCT 15, 2000




 

"If you look at white women, and I think that was the key to this election, Kerry won 45% based on the exit polls--but they're generally in agreement--Kerry won 45%, Bush won 55% of white women. By contrast, Bush won only 45% of white women in 2000, so he upped is percentages by 10 points. In 1996, bill clinton won 48% of white women compared to Bob Dole's 43%. That is a huge, huge difference. I don't think you can lay all that at the doorstep of moral values. I think that this president unabashedly and abjectly took the issue of terror and used it to terrorize... white women."

HEAR HAROLD ICKES
Washington Journal
Nov. 8, 2004
C-SPAN




 

"It's no longer acceptable to say that the abuse and mistreatment of women is cultural. It should be called what it is: criminal."

Hillary Clinton
addressing the UN, 3.4.99


ALSO SEE:


ESTRICH BOOK EXPOSES STOCK HILLARY PLOY: EXPLOIT WOMEN


OPEN LETTER TO SEAN HANNITY ON ESTRICH INTERVIEW, THE CLINTONS' RAPE OF BROADDRICK
(with additions, corrections, addendum)


HILLARY'S COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF PROBLEM


CLINTONS' DOCUMENTED ABUSE OF WOMEN


retrograde feminist fraud positions herself as victim (again) in order to win White House
[FOOL ME ONCE, SHAME ON YOU! FOOL ME TWICE, SHAME ON ME!]


How did the flower children fall for the clintons, 2 such self-evident thugs and opportunists?


KLEIN BOOK CAUSES HILLARY TO (oops!) CONFIRM "THE TRUTH ABOUT HILLARY"
CLINTON'S REACTION EXPOSES FASCISTIC MINDSET, TEXTBOOK CASE OF PARANOIA + MEGALOMANIA, AND A CONSCIOUSNESS OF GUILT IN BROADDRICK RAPE



NOTE THE SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCE IN CLINTON REACTION TIME AND CONTENT TO THE TWO RAPE CHARGES


CATCHING THE CONSCIENCE OF THE KINGFISH
differential reaction to the two rape charges snares the clintons


hillary clinton is a "CONGENITAL LIAR"
("I am not a crook")


BEAUTY AND THE HILDABEAST

 




TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: New York; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: abuseofpower; acquaintancerape; ahabjezabel; clintonabuse; clintoncorruption; clintonrape; clintonsexploitwomen; gulpingforair; hillary; icanhardlybreathe; ministering; rape; rapist; realrape; susanestrich; thecase4hillary; victim

1 posted on 10/14/2005 8:34:17 AM PDT by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jla

ping


2 posted on 10/14/2005 8:38:42 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Baynative

ping


3 posted on 10/14/2005 8:39:03 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jla; WorkingClassFilth; Gail Wynand; Brian Allen; Wolverine; Lonesome in Massachussets; IVote2; ...

ping


4 posted on 10/14/2005 8:40:05 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

^


5 posted on 10/14/2005 8:48:30 AM PDT by rdb3 (Have you ever stopped to think, but forgot to start again?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

Hillary is not a victim (not of sexism, not of her husband, and certainly not of this book); she's not a moderate (despite her effort to re-brand herself in the Senate). Even my sources on the left admit she's positioning herself as a victim and moderate in order to win the White House.
------
The top level of her political strategy. She certainly is not fooling anyone -- the Marxist Medusa has already been calibrated and uncovered. A dispicable excuse for a human being...I could go on for days with the list.


6 posted on 10/14/2005 8:50:35 AM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA

"She certainly is not fooling anyone -- the Marxist Medusa has already been calibrated and uncovered."

I only wish that this statement were true. However, from talking to Democrat sympathizers, Hillary has the nominal support of most of the rank and file masses and they will not hear of the deception being thrown over them. Also, the MSM are willing/eager accomplices to the Hillary deception.


7 posted on 10/14/2005 9:04:14 AM PDT by WmCraven_Wk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

More needs to be reiterated and emphasized as to Hillary Clinton's mentoring: a marxist was her mentor and inspiration, and intellectual, academic instructor. And by her own selection.

Hillary Clinton for the Presidency is parallel to Kruschev for President, if he was still alive, and in so many ways that it's repulsive a thought.


8 posted on 10/14/2005 9:09:05 AM PDT by BIRDS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

My hubby and I are getting older, and reflexes are not as great as before...but you'd be surprised how fast we can hit the mute button when Estrich appears on the screen.

Fingernails on a chalkboard do not bother me -- she makes my flesh crawl.


9 posted on 10/14/2005 9:14:52 AM PDT by kimmie7 (As of September 23, I've been smoke free 7 MONTHS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

Thanks, for the posting. :D


10 posted on 10/14/2005 9:16:57 AM PDT by skinkinthegrass (Just because you're paranoid, doesn't mean they aren't out to get you :^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
"The other thing that distressed me is that a woman has to make herself a victim to be popular. I find that really troubling. She's more popular when she's a victim.

If you ask me she'd be more popular if she were behind bars.

11 posted on 10/14/2005 11:34:39 AM PDT by beyond the sea (Doctor, my eyes... tell me what is wrong...was I unwise to leave them open for so long)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Indeed, by twisting her own scholarship, Estrich indicts the clintons just as surely as the twisting double helix on that blue Gap dress. ----

Beautiful.

12 posted on 10/14/2005 11:36:53 AM PDT by beyond the sea (Doctor, my eyes... tell me what is wrong...was I unwise to leave them open for so long)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Indeed, by twisting her own scholarship, Estrich indicts the clintons just as surely as the twisting double helix on that blue Gap dress. ----

Beautiful.

13 posted on 10/14/2005 11:37:21 AM PDT by beyond the sea (Doctor, my eyes... tell me what is wrong...was I unwise to leave them open for so long)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: WmCraven_Wk

...and they will not hear of the deception being thrown over them. Also, the MSM are willing/eager accomplices to the Hillary deception.
------
This is the problem with liberals. They are fools and louts. This kool-aid drinking base, and the leftist MSM, is the problem force for 2008.


14 posted on 10/14/2005 1:14:01 PM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

bump


15 posted on 10/15/2005 6:07:06 AM PDT by jla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: beyond the sea

thanks. :)


16 posted on 10/15/2005 7:07:51 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: beyond the sea; All

ESTRICH IMPEACHED BY HER OWN WORDS, EXPOSES STOCK HILLARY PLOY: EXPLOIT WOMEN

by Mia T (concerned woman), 10.14.05

my amazon.com review

(please FReep)


17 posted on 10/15/2005 7:13:04 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

bump


18 posted on 10/15/2005 3:10:08 PM PDT by jla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

bump


19 posted on 10/16/2005 9:26:53 AM PDT by jla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

bump


20 posted on 10/17/2005 7:36:06 AM PDT by jla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

bump


21 posted on 10/18/2005 12:42:37 PM PDT by jla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

bump


22 posted on 10/19/2005 4:58:16 AM PDT by jla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: jla
bump

THE DANGER OF RUNNING VICARIOUSLY
Bill O'Reilly chews up and spits out the hillary clinton candidacy
(clip included)



23 posted on 11/03/2005 10:22:20 AM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

bump


24 posted on 11/03/2005 5:26:48 PM PST by jla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson