WHY GEFFEN IMBROGLIO SIGNALS CLINTON'S END ('HILLARY'S STRATEGY-NOBODY GETS TO CRITICIZE HER')

Hardball, The New York Times | 2.22.07 | Mia T

[Mia T]

WHY THE GEFFEN IMBROGLIO SIGNALS CLINTON'S END
'HILLARY'S STRATEGY--NOBODY GETS TO CRITICIZE HER' -- CHRIS MATTHEWS

with a WARNING FOR DAVID GEFFEN

by Mia T, 2.22.07

 

hy did hillary clinton take the bait? The answer is actually quite simple: David Geffen's comments to Maureen Dowd topple the clinton machine's extravagant, fanciful and elaborate construction and expose the candidate for what she is: Defective. Fatally defective.

How is hillary clinton fatally defective? Let me count the ways:

1. the clintons' documented abuse of power ⁴ (redacted via clinton abuse of power!)
   
   
   
   
   

2. the clintons' terrorism failure ³.
   
   
   
   
   

3. the clintons' ¹ rape of Juanita Broaddrick ²
   
   
   
   
   

P.S.:

1. A WARNING FOR DAVID GEFFEN: Limit your attack to the husband's 'personal life' as opposed to the rape, the terrorism failure and the abuses of power (see above), and hillary clinton will simply play her usual default position... the victim... and get the nomination. (HEAR SUSAN ESTRICH: hillary plays 'the victim' for votes)
   
   

2. The clinton machine response to Geffen is rich: The greatest purveyors of slash-and-burn politics (NB: Filegate and the Barrett report) are proscribing slash-and-burn politics. Give us a break.
   
   Note also the insulting transparency of their tactics: How they are trying to attribute Geffen's personal observations to Obama, how they lie that Geffen has a formal position in the Obama campaign, how they use Howard Wolfson and press releases to bash Obama while hillary poses as some distinct entity above it all, and finally, how hillary clinton is playing the race card by exploiting black cutouts.

 

December 7, 1941+64

AN OPEN LETTER TO TIM ROBBINS, DAVID GEFFEN, CHRIS MATTHEWS, MAUREEN DOWD + JEANINE PIRRO

RE: a not-so-modest proposal concerning hillary clinton

Dear Concerned Americans,

hillary clinton's revisionist tome notwithstanding, 'living history' begets a certain symmetry. It is in that light that I make this not-so-modest proposal on this day, exactly 64 years after the attack on Pearl Harbor.

The context of our concern today--regardless of political affiliation--is Iraq and The War on Terror, but the larger fear is that our democracy may not survive.

We have the requisite machines, power and know-how to defeat the enemy in Iraq and elsewhere, but do we have the will?

In particular, do we have the will to identify and defeat the enemy in our midst?

Answerable to no one, heir apparent in her own mind, self-serving in the extreme, hillary clinton incarnates this insidious new threat to our survival.

What we decide to do about missus clinton will tell us much about what awaits us in these perilous new times.

COMPLETE LETTER

December 7, 1941+64
AN OPEN LETTER TO TIM ROBBINS, DAVID GEFFEN, CHRIS MATTHEWS, MAUREEN DOWD + JEANINE PIRRO
RE: a not-so-modest proposal concerning hillary clinton
Mia T

COPYRIGHT MIA T 2005, 2007

COPYRIGHT MIA T 2007

[Mia T]

geffen ping

[theDentist]

You really think it signals the end for her? Are you mad? This is barely a bump on the long road.

[Mia T]

ping

[Mia T]

We shall see. ;)

[Mia T]

ping

[Mia T]

ping

[pissant]

What a thinskinned POS this hag is.

[Mia T]

ping

[Lonesome in Massachussets]

Too bad about Dave Geffen; he had so much to live for.

[E.G.C.]

BTTT

[Publius6961]

Probably a good time to repost a very useful observation about her heinousness...

Reminds me of a fascinating quote from a Chinese Com government during the "International Woman's Conference" held in China during the Clinton administration.
The government official said that they studied Hillary's speechmaking method to understand her power and success. They concluded: her trick was never actually to make any arguments -- just state conclusions that were all already accepted as self-evident by her audience. (They found that interesting and perhaps admirable, and to be emulated).

[Mia T]

I am thinking more 'jump the shark' than 'harpoon the shark' ;)

[Wolfie]

The worst thing about Geffen's comments is that they were right on the money.

[theDentist]

Maybe so, but with all the money (even without Hollywood) and supprt she has nationwide (thanks to Bill and 900 FBI files), I don't think she's done for by a long shot. But it would be soooooo glorious to see her have a Howard Dean "Eeeeearg!!" moment.

[Mia T]

I think Geffen will prevail.

[Mia T]

exactly.

[ozzymandus]

Hillary may be proving herself too angry and over-sensitive to be president. If she continues to make her true personality so obvious that even the MSM can't hide it, it truly may be all over for her.

[Lonesome in Massachussets]

lèse majesté is a capital crime.

[BonnieJ]

They complain about negative, personal attacks...After all the years they perfected that approach!