Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

AN OPEN LETTER TO TIM ROBBINS, DAVID GEFFEN, JEANINE PIRRO et al. CONCERNING HILLARY CLINTON
Dec. 7, 1941+64 | Mia T

Posted on 12/07/2005 8:56:38 AM PST by Mia T

 

AN OPEN LETTER TO TIM ROBBINS, DAVID GEFFEN, CHRIS MATTHEWS, MAUREEN DOWD + JEANINE PIRRO

RE: a not-so-modest proposal concerning hillary clinton

December 7, 2005


Dear Concerned Americans,

Hillary Clinton's revisionist tome notwithstanding, 'living history' begets a certain symmetry. It is in that light that I make this not-so-modest proposal on this day, exactly 64 years after the attack on Pearl Harbor.

The context of our concern today--regardless of political affiliation--is Iraq and The War on Terror, but the larger fear is that our democracy may not survive. We have the requisite machines, power and know-how to defeat the enemy in Iraq and elsewhere, but do we have the will?

In particular, do we have the will to identify and defeat the enemy in our midst?

Answerable to no one, heir apparent in her own mind, self-serving in the extreme, Hillary Clinton incarnates this insidious new threat to our survival.

What we decide to do about Missus Clinton will tell us much about what awaits us in these perilous new times.

Each of you, (for different reasons, surely), has expressed concern about Missus Clinton's putative candidacy in 2008, and, by doing so, has expressed concern inferentially about Clinton-machine control of the nominating process.

My proposal: Stop Missus Clinton in '06. Stop her in '06 and you will have stopped her in '08. A Senate en passant capture is THE MOVE....

To David Geffen and Tim Robbins: Why not field a challenger to Hillary Clinton in '06, someone who does possess the necessary positions, ethics and electability? And why not in the general election? A Perot plurality ploy would be poetic justice, if nothing else... and if carefully selected, that candidate wouldn't merely unseat Missus Clinton but could actually win.

To Jeanine Pirro: If, as Chris Matthews so trenchantly put it, "Pee Wee Herman would give her a race," why aren't you... a bright, talented, articulate, accomplished, charismatic, media-savvy independent woman who spent her 30-year career championing exactly the women Missus Clinton abused for 30 years... why aren't you in fact creaming Missus Clinton?

Stop running YOUR NEXT RACE, stop worrying about being slimed by the Clinton machine. Stop pulling your punches and start going after this corrupt, compromised, dangerous creature for real.



Just as it was exactly 64 years ago today, this is a watershed moment for America. It is my hope that all concerned Americans will do what they can to defeat the enemy.

What we decide to do about Missus Clinton will tell us much about what awaits us in these perilous new times.

Sincerely,

Mia T
December 7, 1941+64

COPYRIGHT MIA T 2005


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: chrismatthews; clinton; clintoncorruption; davidgeffen; dud; facelift; gopprimary; gospencer; hillary; iraq; jeanine; maureendowd; pirro; pirroisamoron; senate; terrorism; terrorist; timrobbins; unelectable; wasteoftime; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-136 last
To: Mia T

bup


101 posted on 12/10/2005 8:28:52 PM PST by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

Once again, a word from our sponsor... page 3 ;)

Bump


102 posted on 12/10/2005 8:29:48 PM PST by railsplitter (with extreme prejudice- destroy the enemy... foreign and domestic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

dang! close but no cigar (bad analogy) bump ;)


103 posted on 12/10/2005 8:30:46 PM PST by railsplitter (with extreme prejudice- destroy the enemy... foreign and domestic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: railsplitter

er, bad metaphor... ? bump ;)


104 posted on 12/10/2005 8:31:35 PM PST by railsplitter (with extreme prejudice- destroy the enemy... foreign and domestic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: railsplitter

thanx bump


105 posted on 12/11/2005 6:35:29 PM PST by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: All
ADDITIONS, CORRECTIONS

December 7, 1941+64

AN OPEN LETTER TO TIM ROBBINS, DAVID GEFFEN, CHRIS MATTHEWS, MAUREEN DOWD + JEANINE PIRRO

RE: a not-so-modest proposal concerning hillary clinton



Dear Concerned Americans,

Hillary Clinton's revisionist tome notwithstanding, 'living history' begets a certain symmetry. It is in that light that I make this not-so-modest proposal on this day, exactly 64 years after the attack on Pearl Harbor.

The context of our concern today--regardless of political affiliation--is Iraq and The War on Terror, but the larger fear is that our democracy may not survive.

We have the requisite machines, power and know-how to defeat the enemy in Iraq and elsewhere, but do we have the will?

In particular, do we have the will to identify and defeat the enemy in our midst?

Answerable to no one, heir apparent in her own mind, self-serving in the extreme, Hillary Clinton incarnates this insidious new threat to our survival.

What we decide to do about Missus Clinton will tell us much about what awaits us in these perilous new times.

Each of you, (for different reasons, surely), has expressed concern about Missus Clinton's putative candidacy in 2008, and, by doing so, has expressed concern inferentially about Clinton-machine control of the nominating process.

My proposal: Stop Missus Clinton in '06. Stop her in '06 and you will have stopped her in '08. A Senate en passant capture is THE MOVE....

To David Geffen and Tim Robbins: Why not field a challenger to Hillary Clinton in '06, someone who does possess the necessary positions, ethics and electability? And why not in the general election? A Perot plurality ploy would be poetic justice, if nothing else... and if carefully selected, that candidate wouldn't merely unseat Missus Clinton but could actually win.

To Jeanine Pirro: If, as Chris Matthews so trenchantly put it, "Pee Wee Herman would give her a race," why aren't you... a bright, talented, articulate, accomplished, charismatic, media-savvy independent woman who spent her 30-year career championing exactly the women Missus Clinton abused for 30 years... why aren't you in fact creaming Missus Clinton?

Stop running YOUR NEXT RACE, stop worrying about being slimed by the Clinton machine. Stop pulling your punches and start going after this corrupt, compromised, dangerous creature for real.



Just as it was exactly 64 years ago today, this is a watershed moment for America. It is my hope that all concerned Americans will do what they can to defeat the enemy.

What we decide to do about Missus Clinton will tell us much about what awaits us in these perilous new times. What we decide to do about Missus Clinton will tell us much about ourselves.

Sincerely,

Mia T

COPYRIGHT MIA T 2005

106 posted on 12/13/2005 7:50:43 AM PST by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jla

additions, corrections bump


107 posted on 12/14/2005 6:31:05 AM PST by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Wolverine

additions, corrections bump


108 posted on 12/14/2005 6:32:12 AM PST by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: UWSrepublican

additions, corrections bump


109 posted on 12/14/2005 6:33:09 AM PST by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: jla
RE my FR profile page: Thoroughly revised/updated it yesterday.

Also, deletehillary.com, while not fully up and running, does have several active links (terrorism, delete, and latest essays). Will try to get more going later today....


110 posted on 12/14/2005 6:35:31 AM PST by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
No doubt that you're a very bright and resourceful young lady.
Oh, I've updated my profile pg. too. New additions are under the Scots folk song. What do you think?
111 posted on 12/14/2005 6:59:20 AM PST by jla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

bump


112 posted on 12/14/2005 7:45:25 AM PST by Wolverine (A Concerned Citizen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: jla

What a sweet page, jla.
The folk song and photo are lovely.
And the recipes!
I never knew. ;)


113 posted on 12/14/2005 7:55:03 AM PST by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
And the recipes!
I never knew.

Heck, Mia, I know that. Why do you think I posted printer-friendly copies? :^)

114 posted on 12/14/2005 7:58:44 AM PST by jla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: jla

:) thanx.


115 posted on 12/14/2005 8:59:43 AM PST by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: jla; Wolverine
Regarding delete hillary website, just added the devastating Candice Jackson quote to kick off the always-changing quotes (w. secret-code-like delivery).
Reinforces the logic of starting with the clinton rapes and predation instead of clinton terrorism failure.

116 posted on 12/14/2005 9:08:55 AM PST by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: UWSrepublican

fyi


117 posted on 12/14/2005 9:32:52 AM PST by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: All

^


118 posted on 12/14/2005 10:05:38 AM PST by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

^


119 posted on 12/14/2005 10:58:48 AM PST by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
BUMP
120 posted on 12/14/2005 12:24:05 PM PST by jla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Know what DeleteHillary.com needs? Another page link.
And we could call it jlannotations.
Catchy, eh?
121 posted on 12/14/2005 12:33:45 PM PST by jla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: jla

bump :)


122 posted on 12/14/2005 2:12:59 PM PST by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: jla

like it bump


123 posted on 12/14/2005 2:14:19 PM PST by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: All


124 posted on 12/14/2005 3:39:24 PM PST by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

bump


125 posted on 12/14/2005 3:40:33 PM PST by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: UWSrepublican

bump


126 posted on 12/14/2005 3:48:09 PM PST by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

Jeannine Pirro = Bernadette Castro with a law degree.


127 posted on 12/14/2005 3:49:07 PM PST by Clemenza (Smartest words ever written by a Communist: "Show me the way to the next Whiskey Bar")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clemenza
Jeannine Pirro = Bernadette Castro with a law degree.--Clemenza

 

You're not suggesting that Jeanine's a sleeper, are you? ;)

Seriously, the analogy breaks down as to opponent, anyway. clinton is no Moynihan. To the contrary.

Yesterday, Daniel Patrick Moynihan died. Today, the clintons are arrogating his soul. Hardly surprising. In 1999, the clintons were not at all shy about seizing his still-warm senate seat.

One has merely to recall the Jefferson double-helix hoax to understand that posthumous misappropriation is, for the obvious reason, the clintons' preferred method of legacy inflation….

Standard-Issue clintonism

If misappropriation of Jefferson's alleles hinged on a broken line of descent, misappropriation of Moynihan's endorsement depends on a broken line of dissent. Like Sally Hemmings' progeny, Moynihan's later acquiescence is of dubious lineage

Mia T
Moynihan Myths


Moynihan proffered one of the more incisive operant definitions of clintonism: "defining deviancy down."

Daniel Patrick Moynihan. American Scholar (Winter 1993)

 

   

 

"Well, how would you imagine that we would have got ourselves in the situation we're in now? We have a crisis of the regime. You cannot have this kind of conduct as normal and acceptable and easily dismissed unless there is a great effort to do so. And if, in addition to what we know, there are things we don't know, that will make it worse."

Sen. Daniel Patrick Moynihan (D.-N.Y.)
commenting on Lewinsky et al.
ABC's "This Week," Sept. 6, 1998

 

 

 

"I should think not. If it's so, it represents a disorder."

Sen. Daniel Patrick Moynihan (D.-N.Y.)
when asked if Clinton could survive if the Lewinsky allegation was true
New York Post, Jan. 26, 1998

 

 

 

[I will] have none of the "it-isn't-so-much-the-sex-its-the lying" [argument].

Sen. Daniel Patrick Moynihan (D.-N.Y.),
ibid.

 

 

 

Sen. Daniel Patrick Moynihan, D-N.Y., also opposed censure, saying Congress should carry out its constitutional duty and decide whether Clinton should be held accountable for impeachable offenses in connection with his affair with Monica Lewinsky or other matters.

Censure unlikely, Lott says, as Congress awaits Starr report
By Jim Abrams
Associated Press

 

 

 

"[T]he critical subject for the politics of the years ahead," [is] "redefining the character issue for the post-Monica era.… There's a sort of absence of character which has been the quality of this administration."

Daniel Patrick Moynihan
Corporate Character: The Humanities and the Businessperson

 

 

 

In the Senate, only Moynihan has called for Clinton's impeachment. …For now, White House and party strategists appear unworried by the criticism they have heard from various Democratic senators and members of Congress. Rather than view the criticism as part of a mounting wave of disillusionment within the party, these strategists are weighing the authors of the criticism one by one: Moynihan and Kerrey, they say, have never liked Clinton, so their remarks are personal.

"Everyone will be punished"
BY JONATHAN BRODER
Salon

 

"We have so many things coming on in the world that we have to be ready for and be able to deal with. This [the President's dilemma] is a distraction which is doubly dangerous because of the world's situation." [Moynihan then ticked off the dangers, which included the building of nukes by North Korea and biological weapons by Iraq.]

Sen. Daniel Patrick Moynihan (D.-N.Y.)
commenting on Lewinsky et al.
ABC's "This Week," Sept. 6, 1998

 

COLOR COMMENTARY, Sept. 17, 1998:

 

D-New York Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan (NY) recently spoke about the international effects of the President's problems on ABC's This Week with Sam Donaldson and Cokie Roberts (Sept. 6, 1998). "We have so many things coming on in the world that we have to be ready for and be able to deal with. This [the President's dilemma] is a distraction which is doubly dangerous because of the world's situation." Later in the broadcast, Moynihan and syndicated political columnist George Will enumerated some of these particular global trouble spots, mentioning Russia's current crisis, the use of ballistic missiles in North Korea, the economic situation in Japan, the potential for military conflict and the building of biological weapons in Iraq, and the ethnic cleansing in Kosovo.

A few weeks ago, we were reminded of the continual danger lurking in Iraq when U.N. Weapons inspector Scott Ritter resigned claiming that the Clinton administration had interfered with at least six inspections since 1997 in an attempt to avoid conflict with Saddam Hussein. It is difficult for a weakened President to deal decisively with a foreign military threat. Hussein has repeatedly proved to the world that he has no respect for democratic processes and will cooperate only in the face of force. He has continually tried to take advantage of weakness. The United States' current state of weakness has made the world more susceptible to Iraq's potentially destructive actions.

Just a few weeks ago, the world received a violent reminder of the ever-present threat of terrorism as U.S. embassies in Afghanistan and Kenya were bombed. Immediately following his testimony before the Independent Counsel, the President ordered counter-attacks against bases of the organization responsible for the embassy bombings. The timing and justifiability of the attacks was immediately questioned by some members of Congress, the news media, and many Americans. People thought it was possible that Clinton ordered the bombings to divert media attention from the Lewinsky affair.…the terrorists who committed these bombings and terrorists contemplating future acts were sitting at home watching the United States unsuccessfully trying to project an image of unity and competence. The United States only opens itself, and the world, up to more acts of terrorism when it seems not to know how to deal effectively with terrorist situations even when it knows who the perpetrators are.

 


128 posted on 12/14/2005 6:28:33 PM PST by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

^


129 posted on 12/14/2005 6:33:08 PM PST by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: All

bump


130 posted on 12/15/2005 3:12:52 AM PST by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

bump


131 posted on 12/15/2005 4:56:19 AM PST by jla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

bump for future reading


132 posted on 02/12/2006 7:19:29 AM PST by Big Guy and Rusty 99 (Liberals are the feces that is produced when shame eats too much stupidity!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Big Guy and Rusty 99

thx :)


133 posted on 04/17/2006 6:14:16 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: jla; All
corrected link:
deletehillary.com

134 posted on 04/17/2006 6:19:00 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: All
P.S. All but 2 links on deletehillary.com are now active.

135 posted on 04/17/2006 6:23:28 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

Can someone tell me why then, did Moynihan endorse Hillary Clinton for his Senate seat? Why would he say (paraphrased) . . "Oh, I think she'd make a TERRIFIC Senator!"

I clearly remember him making that remark, and I wondered at his apparent disassociation of her from the indivisible partnership that she and Bill Clinton had and have. After the total debacle of "their" administration, how could he have wished to do anything less than retire both of those to the ash heap of history? Oh, I do agree he seemed firm on Clinton's debauchery, which was so complete that both Clintons, as I said, sensibly should have been put out to pasture. Hillary reeked from all the scandals. Surely Moynihan knew that he was handing them just the big stepping stone of "career advancement" they needed in NY.


136 posted on 10/21/2006 2:33:59 PM PDT by Twinkie (Faith cometh by hearing, and hearing by the Word of God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-136 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson