Delay must be protected but he cannot shoot his mouth off about impeaching judges when there is no cause. NO judge has done anything of which I have heard deserving of impeachment. Differences of opinion is NOT sufficient.
Then you haven't followed the case very well. There were so many conflicts of interest and outright slanting of evidence that went on in that trial it's like we're living in a banana republic. Now obviously you're happy the woman's no longer with us so why can't you just move on with your life?
Judge Greer broke the law TWICE.
FIRST, he ruled against the Constitution and murdered an innocent woman, Terri Schiavo.
SECOND, he went against Congress, and did what he pleased.
Judge Greer should be IMPEACHED.
Why do you, of all people, want to protect Tom DeLay? You're like a case study.
I would submit that you, and the faction of 'Republicans' you represent, would do so because he is powerful. But if he were weak, you would join the rest of the piranhas in the feeding.
God bless Tom DeLay. At least his first impulse is to protect the weak, not to destroy them or callously stand aside while others with power do so.
If we could say the same for the liberal Republicans, Terri Schiavo would still be alive.
So, ignoring a Congressional Subpoena is not grounds for impeachment?
Nor is ignoring a Congressional mandate for a "de nuvo" (or whatever it was called - sorry about the spelling here) trial to take place?
Man, if that ain't grounds for impeachment, I sure don't know what is.