Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Elderly Couple Hospitalized After Cops Raid Wrong House
Fox News ^ | March 23, 2006 | AP staff

Posted on 03/23/2006 10:59:34 AM PST by seacapn

HORN LAKE, Miss. — An unidentified elderly Horn Lake couple were hospitalized Thursday after police burst into their home thinking it housed a methamphetamine laboratory.

The incident occurred Wednesday about 4 a.m., said police Capt. Shannon Beshears. Beshears said it was the right address but the wrong house.

Beshears said a heavily armed Tactical Apprehension Containment Team stormed the house.

"We had good information from a reliable source that had been backed up by a purchase of narcotics linked to the address. However, when we arrived at the designated address, there were two houses on the lot. We hit the larger of the two houses.

"It was the wrong house," Beshears said. "The house was totally dark and the TACT members went through to the bedroom looking for the suspects."

A man and a woman — both in their 80s — were injured as TACT team members secured the house although no drugs were found. There were children in the house also, but they were not awakened, Beshears said.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Heated Discussion
KEYWORDS: badcopnodonut; banglist; brilliantcops; brownshirts; donutwatch; drugskilledbelushi; jackbootedthugs; jbt; jbtwatch; meth; methhouse; officerretardo; police; policeschooldropouts; sirmayihaveanother; wodlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 341-347 next last
To: demkicker

"There's been a load of compromisin' on the road to my horizon"

As even OPD pointed out someone, if not someones, in Whalen's employ likely effed up good when the property proved to be dual. And choosing the larger one? Why wouldn't it make sense that a drug lab, with its toxic chemicals, would be kept in the smaller of two structures with the dwelling being in the larger one?


181 posted on 03/23/2006 1:06:34 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

To: Shadow Deamon

Interesting. Another anonymous name caller. What exactly were you arrested for that wasn't you fault ( just a little weed ) or how fast wewre you going on your last ticket?


182 posted on 03/23/2006 1:08:49 PM PST by One Proud Dad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]

To: One Proud Dad

You get to hide your risk that way. That may be smart poker but it's giving the public the mushroom treatment.


183 posted on 03/23/2006 1:11:03 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
it's easier and cleaner to catch the drug lab on the table than to fish it out of the sewer pipe or septic tank.

I don't want to make a cop's life harder, but I also sleep with access to a gun.

An erroneous dynamic entry in my house will lead to deadly consequences for either a cop or myself.

Seizing contraband is not worth the risk of hurting a citizen or a cop.

The fewer dynamic entries, the fewer errors that are introduced in the process. We are asking cops to conduct very dangerous business without anyone getting hurt, and that's not fair to anyone involved.

184 posted on 03/23/2006 1:11:04 PM PST by george wythe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

There was way too much assumin' goin' on. Sounds like a Barney Fife type of police force.


185 posted on 03/23/2006 1:11:51 PM PST by demkicker (democrats and terrorists are familiar bedfellows)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

Like I said one lazy or incompetent officer did not do his/her homework. That one is at fault and the Chief is a buffoon for categorically defending that person(s).


186 posted on 03/23/2006 1:12:56 PM PST by One Proud Dad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies]

To: MikeWUSAF
Law enforcement officers are supposed to serve and protect.

No, that was the job of an earkier body, the police: to maintain the public peace.
The change to enforcing was announced by Chicago mayor Richard Daley in the 60s. "The police are not there to create disorder, they are there to maintain disorder"

187 posted on 03/23/2006 1:13:04 PM PST by Oztrich Boy (Have a beer (Offer not vaild in Canada)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: demkicker

"Hey we made a mistake but we made it right."


188 posted on 03/23/2006 1:13:30 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: antiRepublicrat
Nice to see we agree on something. :)

We agree 99% of the time. There are few posters whose comments I always look forward to read, and you are one of them.

189 posted on 03/23/2006 1:13:48 PM PST by george wythe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: One Proud Dad
You want to compare Johnsons?

LOL, Thats why people like you want such jobs. The little man syndrome.

190 posted on 03/23/2006 1:13:48 PM PST by vikzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: demkicker

I.e. "We made the mistake properly."


191 posted on 03/23/2006 1:14:54 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: vikzilla

He should just get a Fat Boy harly. Or two harlies.


192 posted on 03/23/2006 1:15:39 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies]

To: vikzilla

I am too large a man to suffer Napolean syndrome.

I had a misguided belief as a young man that after I left the Marine Corps public service was a good and noble thing. I was wrong. It is a just job that makes nobody happy especially the one doing the job.

Alcoholism, suicide, and domestic violence are higher by percentage among police officers than John Q. Public. ever think why? They deal with your trash and problems all day and their own problems have to be left at home ( in a perfect world ).

Nothin more disgusting than answering a domestic call between two drunks who get into it about every 4th day or so and have to listen to them whine about you not doing your job. So on one occasion you actually take one to jail because there is evidence that one actually hit the other and the one you didn't take jumps on your back to "save" the other from going to jail after demanding you do something. Then in 3-4 days after teh one bonds out ( paid by teh other one ) you are called again for the same sh_t.

You have no idea about frustration my friend.


193 posted on 03/23/2006 1:25:44 PM PST by One Proud Dad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies]

To: Supernatural

Well they sure taught these druggies a lesson...

Oh, wait!

Really, why don't they just arrest these people in the daylight or something? This is ridiculous.


194 posted on 03/23/2006 1:30:55 PM PST by planekT (<- http://www.wadejacoby.com/pedro/ ->)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

Motorcylces are suicide machines. I am sorry if I gave the idea that I am a jack-booted thug, bully, or thrill seeker, quite the opposite, I am a dreamer who is disillusioned.

My only hobbies are watching all of my kids activities and the occasional hunting trip.

That is of course if you do not count my daily inventory of my cache of weapons I store under the floor of the house in preparation for the collaspe of society.


195 posted on 03/23/2006 1:31:12 PM PST by One Proud Dad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: One Proud Dad

Too many small towns and counties are hiring jackbooted thugs for cops.
They build oversized police departments because they want
to collect traffic fines, then the departments get out of hand, due to incompetence.

This is not a case of hostages being held. It is a purported dope lab. Big deal.

Let your big time swat team surround the house and wait for daylight. Call the house on the phone and see what happens.

There are way too many cases of the cops busting down the wrong door.


196 posted on 03/23/2006 1:33:39 PM PST by AlexW (Reporting from Bratislava, Slovakia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: planekT

Well, we see the blame all being on the guy who screwed up the location.

No blame at all being put on the "brave" officers in their black ski masks, bullet proof vests carrying submachineguns and beating up 80 year old people for no reason at all, other than they could and it is "proper" police procedure.

Those guys have a free will and supposedly have common sense, just like the rest of us. The rest of us are held accountable for our actions.

What would happen to you or me if we broke into the home of an 80 year old couple in the middle of the night, pointed guns at them and beat them up? Shouldn't the same thing happen to the police who were involved in this farce?

No according to at least one person on the tread. Heroes to him always. They are cops and can do no wrong.


197 posted on 03/23/2006 1:35:51 PM PST by Supernatural (Ea wull staun ma groon, Staun ma groon al nae be afraid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
Why wouldn't it make sense that a drug lab, with its toxic chemicals, would be kept in the smaller of two structures with the dwelling being in the larger one?

Well, they also screwed up when they failed to check the smaller building (I seen no mention of meth equipment being later found). Or perhaps the "reliable information" wasn't quite so, and it wasn't a matter of "correct address, but wrong building"

198 posted on 03/23/2006 1:35:54 PM PST by Oztrich Boy (Have a beer (Offer not vaild in Canada)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

Too funny!!!


199 posted on 03/23/2006 1:37:08 PM PST by demkicker (democrats and terrorists are familiar bedfellows)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: One Proud Dad
"Interesting. Another anonymous name caller. What exactly were you arrested for that wasn't you fault ( just a little weed ) or how fast wewre you going on your last ticket?"

I've never been arrested, rarely drive more that 5 over. So how many things have you done under cover of the law that would have gotten me arrested if I did them?

Me thinks you protest too much, I really couldn't care less about you and your fellow officers, I treat them with respect like anyone else until such time that they prove they don't deserve respect. Hopefully, you were a good officer, but for you to be defending these actions doesn't sit well with me. I agree, one person is responsible for the inaccurate address info, but that does not in any way mean that the officer(s) who manhandled these elderly people are free from responsibility.

Myself, I would be dead because the first person thru the my door would be shot. I have a CCW so I'm not a criminal and I resent the attitude of us vs. them that is all too prevelant in todays police forces.

200 posted on 03/23/2006 1:38:08 PM PST by Shadow Deamon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 341-347 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson