Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: Supernatural

Ahh, the moronic answer.

If you do not like it run for your state legislature and change the laws and policy of your police. Until then complain away to guys like me who don't give a crap one way or the other because I am a facist by some accounts.

Amazing how you people cannot stay on target. I was opposing the call to condemn all officers as opposed to the one who made the error. No one has proved that the elderly were beaten, so the entry team is vindicated until then. I will repeat myself for those in the back and without standing, if they were beaten charge all who applied said beating.

Are any of you going to answer my question about GWB and his action on faulty intel? Or is that too hard of a parallel to draw?


237 posted on 03/23/2006 2:31:03 PM PST by One Proud Dad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 232 | View Replies ]


To: One Proud Dad

His intel was supposed to be a bit more elite body than someone claiming to have bought some drugs at the premises.


238 posted on 03/23/2006 2:33:10 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 237 | View Replies ]

To: One Proud Dad

You have yet to condemn the police who roughed up the old folks. When does that happen?

You insist all the blame lies with the one guy who got the warrant.

I insist that the guys who roughed up the old people should be held liable for their own actions.

You have yet to answer the same question I have asked you four times. Why should I answer any of your questions?


250 posted on 03/23/2006 2:56:51 PM PST by Supernatural (Ea wull staun ma groon, Staun ma groon al nae be afraid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 237 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson