Posted on 05/01/2006 8:29:14 AM PDT by SirLinksalot
http://www.s8int.com/dino1.html
Fossil Dinosaur Prints Together with Human Prints
This photo from the Interactive Bible Site, shows a series of 14 left, right footprints with three- toed dinosaur tracks intersecting at 30 degrees.
"Believe it or not, dinosaur footprints, and the footprints of man, are found in the same strata, in the very same formation, in some cases only 18 inches apart, at a geological dig in Glen Rose, Texas, called the Paluxy River Bed. The ancient footprints of "man" at the site are found to be evenly spaced, and go under overhanging shale formations, continuing under the formations, and have been excavated.
Though the dino tracks (in the Paluxy River Bed in Glen Rose, Texas, for instance) are real, perhaps the human prints were later 'clever carvings' by Indians (who must have gotten around other states a lot).
Recent research, however, has shown that they CONTINUE under shale bulldozed away, and paleontologists like Dr. Camp of the University of California and Dr. G. Wescott of Ypsilanti, Michigan, have pronounced them genuine.
Scores of other similar finds have come in: human skulls in the Pliocene strata; pollen and anthropods in Pre-Cambrian layers; even pictographs of a dinosaur among other animals on ancient canyon walls, which would knock some 70 million years out of the geologic column" (Acts, p.15, June 1996).
ID is not a cult - simply says that life is too complex too 'evolve' out of nothing. I agree. The YEC make the most sense to me when you apply true scientific methods to each. I've studied all 3 - creation, evolution, and intelligent design as well as criticisms of each.
You can drive a truck through most of the holes in the evolution theory. The more evolutionists have 'learned' the more time and complexity the theory needs to be even remotely plausible.
Maybe your time would be better spent reviewing the holes in the evolution theory or even better disproving the Bible. Two very simple questions from John MacArthur.
1.) How did the rule of law evolve w/o the Bible?
2.) How did the 7-day week evolve w/o the Bible?
Go read Steve Hassan's "Releasing the Bonds" or "Combatting Cult Mind Control" and then come back and tell me if it is a cult.
Then go read how science is properly practiced.
As a person who has worked a lot to free many people from cults including bible based high control groups such as the JWs, I find your comment in poor taste.
Sounds just like someone saying the earth was created by God, but he made it LOOK like it was billions of years old just to throw us off the trail.
Fortunately for her, she firmly espouses evolution, so she won't be laughed out of her profession.
At least, so long as she makes certain to criticize creationists at every opportunity. She has to hold off the wolves until they can come up with SOME explanation of how they were so completely wrong about soft tissue, while being so exactly RIGHT about everything else.
Actually, what this shows is how belief in evolution precludes real science. Apparently for DECADES scientists, assuming the earth to be millions of years old, and therefore assuming soft tissue couldn't survive, NEVER EVEN THOUGHT to cut a single bone open to see what was inside -- at least that's what SHE says.
So while the masses assume they say there is no soft tissue because they never FOUND any, it seems they simply never LOOKED for it.
But again, they are evolutionists, so all will be forgiven.
If someone doesn't like my comment, they are free to ignore it.
(Next thing you know, YECers will be carving fake "Man Tracks" alongside dinosaur footprints to "Prove That Man Walked With The Dinosaurs"...)
Could you please clarify if you are saying that the rule of law would not exist without the Bible?
"It will eventually be proven that humans didn't descend from ape-like creatures."
I guess you're entitled to your dreams.....
You wrote this almost two weeks ago and we have this thread here just today so we must have been snoozing when this all first was announced.
I liked your letter, it was pointed and direct; who knows, maybe AIG will publish it.
A possible future project for the Folding @ Home crowd?
yes
Yep, I would accept that as evidence... ;-)
It's been longer than two weeks, actually. They'd better get a move on if they're going to respond, I sent it to them March 17.
As are you....
Maybe your time would be better spent reviewing the holes in the evolution theory or even better disproving the Bible. Two very simple questions from John MacArthur.
1.) How did the rule of law evolve w/o the Bible?
2.) How did the 7-day week evolve w/o the Bible?
Oh look, an anti-evolutionist who didn't bother to read the article before issuing snotty and misguided taunts. Typical.
Yes, that's the nice thing about unfalsifiable "theories" like creationism; they never have to adapt to new information because the answer is always "God did it".
1.) How did the rule of law evolve w/o the Bible?
Huh? Look at Hammurabi, for example.
2.) How did the 7-day week evolve w/o the Bible?
Apparently via pagan astrologists. Good Moon Day to you.
This is what passes for logical arguments from creationists?
Then explain how there is a Helen Thomas.
They're talking about SOFT tissue - not the bony and horny cartilage outgrowths.
You should ought to have known better that you mislead people into thinking scientists practice the same techniques as leaders of a cult.
Expert's such as Steve Hassan (who went through hell and back) clearly know scienists who practice science properly; share their work to allow it to be re-tested over and over; and; allow their work to be peer reviewed are not in a cult. Hassan and other have specific tools to identify and define these high control groups.
Smarten up.
And most people believe that God created evolution.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.