Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: CarolinaGuitarman
So, you admit you are NOT an example of integrity? That's the first step to recovery. Admitting you have a problem.No. Okay. Fine. So what are you waiting for?

So, you have nothing to refute the facts that the blogger presented?

Facts!?

The Sternberg saga is turning into a creationist canard and martyr complex for all those "poor, persecuted" IDers. The myth is that Sternberg is some kind of heroic spotless lamb who was lambasted for choosing to believe in God by godless hacks like me. A guest columnist recently wrote that science is being "silenced":

What a loon you have for a source. And he admits to being a hack.

And yet you claim it has been falsified. Curious.

It should be curious, since I made no such claim.

I repeat, "I contend that Darwinism is also non-falsifiable."

1,200 posted on 05/03/2006 9:15:37 PM PDT by AndrewC (Darwinian logic -- It is just-so if it is just-so)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1197 | View Replies ]


To: AndrewC
"So, you admit you are NOT an example of integrity? That's the first step to recovery. Admitting you have a problem.

No."

Uh oh, your recovery just hit a bump. You already admitted you had no integrity (I told you to speak for yourself when you told me I had no integrity, and you said you WERE speaking for yourself). Don't lose everything you've gained by denying it now. Remember, one day at a time, keep it simple; the first year is a gift.

"It should be curious, since I made no such claim."

Sure you did; you said that evidence against evolution exists but is suppressed.

"I repeat, "I contend that Darwinism is also non-falsifiable.""

And I repeat: That is logically incompatible with saying that there is evidence against evolution that is being suppressed.

Without being supported by evidence one contention is no better than another. You act as if the fact that a contention doesn't have to be supported by evidence to be called a contention means that a contention doesn't need to be supported by evidence to be taken seriously.

Unfalsifiable claims cannot, by definition, have evidence that goes against them. Yet you claim that evolution is both unfalsifiable AND has evidence that goes against it (which is vigorously suppressed by a secret conspiracy of evolutionists). There is a deep logical contradiction in your position, and you are not man enough to admit it.

We have to give it away to keep it.
Surrender to become Victorious.
1,210 posted on 05/04/2006 4:48:58 AM PDT by CarolinaGuitarman ("There is grandeur in this view of life....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1200 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson