That was quite a non-post. Pretty standard in the CRIDer arsenal. But "No one argues about what we have direct observation of" is pretty funny. There are a LOT of scientific debates on gravity, string theory, DNA, etc. etc. etc.
You need to get out more and see what really happens in the world.
"You need to get out more and see what really happens in the world."
You mean get out and "observe"? That's exactly what's missing from your evo arsenal, actual observations which are testable. It's just lots of supposition and assumptions built on top of more of the same.
"There are a LOT of scientific debates on gravity, string theory, DNA, etc. etc. etc. "
Yes. Interesting that gravity and DNA have testable hypotheses, isn't it? String theory is not testable (yet) but it's still hotly debated and no one is putting their foot down and insisting that it's a fact, either.
Evolution is a fact. It's testable and verifiable. Common descent is neither testable nor verifiable.