Why yes, things like this had previously amazed me as too until I understood mankinds' need for revisiing history.
So in other words, all of history is wrong where it indicates that other cultures developed codes of law without the assistance of the Bible. Uh huh. It's a world-wide conspiracy to fake up cultural history. Sure.
Here's another poser - how did language originate? Did it start with 1 language or many? Possibly you've heard that Hebrew is/was the most highly-evolved of all known languages? Science used to laugh at the Biblical idea that man is composed of dust until recently.
That isn't so much a "poser" as....well, to put it kindly, there really is such a thing as a stupid question. How you got from sentence one to sentence four in that paragraph is a mind-boggling trip through crazy non-sequitur land.
Also which is more amazing - the dates on your research items or the dates ascribed to evolution? Just as we do today, mankind has always done, leave behind some trace of their existence. So please show me anything mankind recorded that is over 10,000 years old. I won't consider anything using dating theories that contain assumptions (i.e. cave painting on a '65 million year old rock').
So in other words, you won't consider any actual evidence that doesn't agree with your preconceived ideas. That's fine. Now, how 'bout you pull your tinfoil hat down a little more firmly around your ears and have a nice day.
So simply b/c I ask a few more questions you draw wrong conclusions from my statements, change the subject and fit me for a tin-foil hat? Peace, love, dope...